XML Sitemap

This is a XML Sitemap which is supposed to be processed by search engines which follow the XML Sitemap standard like Ask.com, Bing, Google and Yahoo.
It was generated using the WordPress content management system and the Google Sitemap Generator Plugin by Arne Brachhold.
You can find more information about XML sitemaps on sitemaps.org and Google's list of sitemap programs.

URLPriorityChange frequencyLast modified (GMT)
https://taxcaselaw.com/cestat-chandigarh-where-some-activities-namely-cutting-punching-welding-drilling-and-bending-were-undertaken-by-job-worker-on-steel-items-said-activities-did-not-amount-to-manufacture/20%Monthly2019-07-29 06:31
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-whether-members-of-aop-have-distinct-identity-vis-a-vis-as-its-constituent-firm-as-in-the-case-of-partners-firm-u-s-184/20%Monthly2019-08-28 10:37
https://taxcaselaw.com/himachal-pradesh-h-c-an-undertaking-or-an-enterprise-established-after-7-1-2003-and-carried-out-substantial-expansion-within-specified-window-period-i-e-between-7-1-2003-and-1-4-2012-wou/20%Monthly2018-11-07 11:15
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-the-notice-was-issued-for-imposition-of-penalty-u-s-271aab-and-not-for-imposition-of-penalty-u-s-271ac/20%Monthly2019-08-31 06:54
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-refund-to-assessee-could-not-be-denied-merely-due-to-issuance-of-notice-for-scrutiny-under-section-1432/20%Monthly2018-09-17 09:46
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-whether-the-assessee-is-entitled-to-claim-deduction-under-section-43b-of-the-income-tax-act-1961-in-respect-of-the-excise-duty-paid-in-advance-in-the-personal-ledger-account-pla-for-short/20%Monthly2018-11-07 10:26
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-the-petitioner-filed-its-e-return-of-income-disclosing-total-income-rs-2418597-upon-scrutiny-assessment-being-made-under-section-143-3/20%Monthly2019-08-29 12:07
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-this-circular-should-not-be-applied-by-the-high-courts-ipso-facto-when-matter-had-a-cascading-effect-and-where-common-principles-may-be-involved-in-subsequent-group-of-matters-or-a-large-number/20%Monthly2018-11-14 05:55
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-where-president-of-vat-tribunal-on-reference-made-by-a-bench-of-two-members-constituted-a-larger-bench-consisting-of-himself-and-two-other-members-and-thereafter-passed-an-order-that-refe/20%Monthly2019-07-29 06:32
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-the-income-tax-appellate-tribunal-was-confirmed-the-action-of-the-cit-invoking-the-jurisdiction-under-section-263-of-the-income-tax-act-on-the-facts-and-circumstances-of-the-case/20%Monthly2019-08-30 07:57
https://taxcaselaw.com/sikkim-h-c-where-a-clear-policy-of-100-per-cent-excise-duty-exemption-to-industrial-units-set-up-in-sikkim-as-well-as-to-those-industries-those-went-in-for-substantial-expansion-had-been-promised-a/20%Monthly2019-07-29 09:57
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-where-assessee-disclosed-all-relevant-facts-at-time-of-assessment-mere-fact-that-he-had-confiscated-certain-amount-received-as-advance-for-sale-of-property-which-had-been-allowed-as-bad/20%Monthly2018-12-01 05:55
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-where-assessee-non-commercial-research-institution-claimed-that-it-had-a-vested-right-in-its-favour-for-continuation-of-exemption-from-payment-of-both-customs-and-excise-duty-until-validit/20%Monthly2019-07-29 09:53
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-issue-of-misclassification-and-under-valuation-of-goods-has-to-be-gone-into-by-respective-assessing-officers-and-not-by-detaining-officer/20%Monthly2019-07-29 10:01
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-date-of-transfer-as-the-date-of-handling-over-of-physical-possession-of-the-property-i-e-01-03-2008-by-the-assessee-as-against-the-date-of-execution-of-development-agreement-alongwi/20%Monthly2018-09-17 08:43
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-whether-the-tribunal-is-right-in-law-and-on-facts-in-confirming-the-order-passed-by-the-cita-deleting-the-disallowance-of-rs-2422063-paid-to-green-environment-co-operative-society-o/20%Monthly2019-08-05 08:33
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-petitioner-is-aggrieved-by-the-impugned-order-passed-by-the-respondent-rejecting-the-petitioners-objections-to-a-notice-dated-30-03-2017-issued-under-section-148/20%Monthly2019-09-12 06:28
https://taxcaselaw.com/uttarakhand-h-c-educational-institution-in-the-name-and-style-of-j-b-memorial-manas-academy-pithoragarh-petitioner-society-applied-for-exemption-u-s-1023civ/20%Monthly2019-06-20 11:33
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-where-under-master-agreement-between-coca-cola-and-parle-group-assessee-subsidiary-was-to-be-formed-for-bottling-soft-drinks-for-coca-cola-and-as-a-result-of-breach-of-contract-by-coca-c/20%Monthly2018-11-07 11:36
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-where-renovation-and-modernization-had-brought-substantial-improvement-in-functioning-of-establishment-and-amount-so-spent-was-over-50-per-cent-of-then-existing-book-value-of-establishmen/20%Monthly2018-11-07 11:05
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-no-appeal-lies-against-the-said-order-under-section-246a-1c/20%Monthly2018-11-07 11:01
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-karasamadhana-scheme-2017-kss-2017-providing-for-waiver-of-penalty-and-interest-is-a-self-contained-and-special-piece-of-legislation-enacted-under-special-circumstances-to/20%Monthly2019-07-29 10:04
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-set-off-of-entry-tax-can-only-be-granted-if-assessee-is-an-importer-of-scheduled-goods-who-is-liable-to-pay-tax-under-vat-act-assessee-must-incur-tax-liability-at-rates-specified-under-section/20%Monthly2019-07-29 10:07
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-where-tribunal-dismissed-appeal-of-assessee-on-ground-that-there-was-huge-pendency-involving-crores-of-rupees-of-revenue-and-adjudication-of-lis-involving-minor-demand-would-not-be-produ/20%Monthly2019-07-29 10:10
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-where-assessee-filed-slp-against-judgment-of-hc-and-on-merits-submitted-that-hc-relied-upon-non-existent-provisions-under-central-excise-act-to-impose-penalty-registry-was-directed-to-issue-n/20%Monthly2019-07-29 10:10
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-education-cess-and-higher-education-cess-paid-along-with-excise-duty-liable-to-be-refunded-along-with-central-excise-duty-in-terms-of-exemption-notifications-when-excise-duty-is-not-payable/20%Monthly2019-07-29 10:18
https://taxcaselaw.com/rajasthan-h-c-whether-the-department-can-take-a-contrary-view-than-the-circular-which-has-been-issued-for-reduction-of-arrears-in-the-supreme-court-high-courts-and-tribunals-and-insist-for-arguing/20%Monthly2018-09-17 08:27
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-the-tribunal-was-justified-in-confirming-the-demand-of-interest-u-s-234-a-and-234-b-of-the-income-tax-act/20%Monthly2019-01-07 11:57
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-whether-the-expenses-claimed-had-in-fact-accrued-or-were-contingent/20%Monthly2019-09-07 12:03
https://taxcaselaw.com/cestat-ahmedabad-where-assessee-during-period-june-2011-to-march-2012-paid-service-tax-on-construction-service-involving-modernization-renovation-and-repair-work-within-factory-it-was-eligi/20%Monthly2019-07-29 08:17
https://taxcaselaw.com/dellhi-h-c-order-dated-31-03-2016-passed-under-section-263-of-the-act-was-without-jurisdiction-illegal-and-bad-in-law/20%Monthly2019-01-07 11:52
https://taxcaselaw.com/aar-newdelhi-the-payments-received-to-be-received-by-the-applicant-for-rendering-lighting-and-searchlight-services-to-the-organizing-committee-commonwealth-games-2010-delhi-hereinafter-referre/20%Monthly2018-09-17 08:03
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-where-under-a-lease-arrangement-between-government-lessee-and-lessor-lessee-took-liability-to-bear-obligation-of-registration-charges-stamp-duty-service-tax-etc-if-applicable-towards-hi/20%Monthly2019-07-29 10:26
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-difference-of-opinion-between-commissioner-appeals-and-tpo-as-to-appropriateness-of-one-or-other-methods-is-hardly-issues-that-ought-to-be-gone-into-by-high-court-in-appeals-under-secti/20%Monthly2019-01-07 12:54
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-where-advertisement-revenue-was-directly-co-related-to-channel-viewership-and-sale-of-advertisement-airtime-increased-with-number-of-cricketing-events-both-distribution-business-segment-a/20%Monthly2019-01-07 11:58
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-pending-appeal-before-division-bench-validity-of-section-15-stipulating-composition-of-tax-could-not-be-decided-in-writ-petition/20%Monthly2019-07-29 08:19
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-there-is-no-provision-in-tamil-nadu-vat-act-rules-to-make-payment-of-tax-which-has-to-be-paid-along-with-monthly-returns-in-instalments/20%Monthly2019-07-29 10:29
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-where-assessee-against-order-of-assessment-filed-writ-petition-contending-that-ao-had-failed-to-consider-that-payment-had-been-made-to-subcontractor-and-as-per-rule-85-of-vat-rules-sa/20%Monthly2019-07-29 10:30
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-where-assessee-filed-writ-seeking-permission-to-file-itr-without-quoting-aadhar-no-and-contended-that-sc-had-in-binoy-viswam-v-uoi-2017-396-itr-66-249-taxman-290-82-taxmann-com-211-g/20%Monthly2018-04-05 09:50
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-income-computation-and-disclosure-standards-icds-notified-by-central-government-in-exercise-of-power-under-section-1452-can-not-override-binding-judicial-precedents-or-provisions-o/20%Monthly2018-11-07 11:11
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-where-assessee-company-had-development-infrastructure-facilities-and-allotted-plots-to-34-units-in-assessment-year-2010-11-which-was-more-than-minimum-requirement-as-per-industrial-park/20%Monthly2019-01-07 13:11
https://taxcaselaw.com/uttarakhand-h-c-whether-since-it-was-a-case-where-assessment-had-been-reopened-on-basis-of-tangible-material-placed-on-record-validity-of-reassessment-proceedings-deserved-to-be-upheld/20%Monthly2018-12-15 08:27
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-in-view-of-provisions-of-section-421-read-with-section-383-interest-on-refund-has-to-be-paid-from-date-when-refund-was-due-to-be-paid-to-assessee-or-date-when-overpaid-amount-was-pai/20%Monthly2019-07-29 10:36
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-where-as-per-tender-document-entire-amount-of-bid-document-fee-with-gst-was-required-to-be-deposited-at-relevant-time-and-petitioner-did-not-deposit-bid-document-which-included-gst-at/20%Monthly2019-07-29 10:52
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-depreciation-u-s-321-could-not-have-been-thrust-on-the-assessee-based-on-the-decision-reported-in-243-itr-56-is-applicable-to-the-facts-of-the-case-is-contrary-to/20%Monthly2019-09-03 11:28
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-whether-since-assessee-disputed-his-liability-to-pay-tax-on-capital-gains-and-interest-levied-giving-effect-to-capital-gains-based-on-receipt-of-compensation-it-would-not-absolve-him-fro/20%Monthly2018-07-13 07:50
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-rule-40-is-only-an-enabling-provision-and-the-assessee-cannot-as-a-matter-of-right-claim-waiver-of-interest-or-reduction/20%Monthly2019-08-24 09:56
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-depreciation-u-s-321-could-not-have-been-thrust-on-the-assessee-based-on-the-decision-reported-in-243-itr-56-is-applicable-to-the-facts-of-the-case-is-contrary-to-2/20%Monthly2019-09-07 06:12
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-slp-dismissed-against-high-courts-ruling-that-in-view-of-amended-provision-of-section-10bextended-period-of-tax-holiday-to-a-100-per-cent-export-oriented-undertaking-from-5-years-to-10-consec/20%Monthly2019-01-08 07:48
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-an-assessee-was-entitled-to-interest-under-section-244a-when-refund-arose-to-it-on-account-of-interest-partially-waived-off-under-sections-234a-to-234c-by-an-order-of-settlement-commission/20%Monthly2019-01-07 13:13