XML Sitemap

This is a XML Sitemap which is supposed to be processed by search engines which follow the XML Sitemap standard like Ask.com, Bing, Google and Yahoo.
It was generated using the WordPress content management system and the Google Sitemap Generator Plugin by Arne Brachhold.
You can find more information about XML sitemaps on sitemaps.org and Google's list of sitemap programs.

URLPriorityChange frequencyLast modified (GMT)
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-assessment-order-without-complying-the-requirement-of-section-144c1-invalid/20%Monthly2018-03-31 09:37
https://taxcaselaw.com/cestat-chennai-whether-printed-computer-stationary-manifold-business-forms-being-manufactured-by-assessee-being-customized-business-forms-which-cannot-be-sold-in-open-market-are-classifiable-under-c/20%Monthly2018-07-17 13:00
https://taxcaselaw.com/cestat-new-delhi-whether-since-items-imported-i-e-tail-brush-firc-by-assessee-was-suitable-for-use-principally-with-tunnel-boarding-machine-tbm-which-was-covered-under-chapter-heading-8430-r/20%Monthly2018-07-17 12:34
https://taxcaselaw.com/cestat-allahabad-where-assessee-had-constructed-individual-residential-flats-units-houses-on-a-large-plot-of-land-said-service-would-not-fall-under-category-of-construction-of-complex-service/20%Monthly2018-07-17 12:21
https://taxcaselaw.com/cestat-new-delhi-whether-product-in-question-was-chewing-tobacco-classifiable-under-heading-2403-99-10/20%Monthly2018-07-17 12:08
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-where-revenue-had-been-unable-to-show-that-liaison-office-of-assessee-was-used-for-purpose-of-business-or-trading-activity-tribunal-was-correct-in-holding-that-assessee-did-not-have-a-pe/20%Monthly2018-07-14 09:45
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-whether-since-second-notice-for-initiating-reassessment-was-time-barred-section-153a-to-revive-abated-reassessment-proceedings-under-section-147-148-did-not-arise/20%Monthly2019-01-03 12:39
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-where-audited-accounts-were-already-available-with-assessing-officer-and-formed-part-of-assessment-record-merely-suggesting-that-there-was-failure-on-part-of-assessee-to-compute-and-decla/20%Monthly2019-01-03 12:12
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-merely-because-reasons-recorded-by-assessing-officer-proceeded-on-same-basis-on-which-assessing-officer-initially-desired-to-make-additions-but-which-failed-on-account-of-setting-aside-o/20%Monthly2018-10-13 13:01
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-assessee-had-not-even-attempted-to-show-that-the-investments-in-sister-concerns-served-any-business-purpose/20%Monthly2019-03-12 10:17
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-the-rules-contained-in-the-iind-schedule-to-the-income-tax-act-govern-the-procedure-for-sale-of-an-immovable-property/20%Monthly2019-06-08 08:40
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-reassessment-to-disallow-expenditure-under-section-14a-was-unjustified-when-dividend-income-was-not-exempt-during-year/20%Monthly2019-01-03 12:04
https://taxcaselaw.com/cestat-new-delhi-whether-since-wash-water-was-nothing-but-a-residual-waste-emerging-in-process-of-manufacture-of-polyamide-chips-it-was-not-an-excisable-commodity/20%Monthly2018-07-17 11:50
https://taxcaselaw.com/cestat-new-delhi-whether-since-magazine-was-identifiable-with-airlines-operation-and-business-of-assessee-amount-received-by-assessee-was-liable-to-service-tax-under-category-of-franchisee-servic/20%Monthly2018-07-17 11:35
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-whether-on-facts-and-circumstances-of-the-case-the-appellate-tribunal-was-correct-in-deleting-the-penalty-levied-u-s-2711c/20%Monthly2019-01-02 06:55
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-assessee-is-definitely-showing-low-rate-of-profits-in-comparison-to-the-regular-civil-construction-and-hence-profit-can-be-estimated-by-the-assessing-officer-in-the-instant-case-in-th/20%Monthly2019-01-02 06:47
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-hile-passing-an-order-under-section-245d4-of-the-it-act-is-justified-in-charging-the-interest-on-he-difference-of-the-amount-disclosed-at-the-time-of-making-application-under-section-2/20%Monthly2019-06-24 07:10
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-whether-in-the-facts-and-circumstances-of-the-case-the-itat-was-correct-in-law-in-confirming-the-addition-on-account-of-the-claim-of-depreciation-on-software/20%Monthly2019-01-03 06:31
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-assessees-claim-of-debt-the-itat-ought-to-have-dismissed-the-assessees-appeal-and-not-remanded-the-matter-to-the-ao-for-re-computation-of-the-same-as-a-speculative-loss/20%Monthly2019-01-02 06:23
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-transfer-of-license-to-use-software-as-a-sale-instead-of-royalty-by-relying-on-decision-of-honble-supreme-court-in-the-case-of-tata-consultancy-services-v-state-of/20%Monthly2018-03-31 09:38
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-letter-dated-15-01-1998-of-the-assessee-addressed-to-the-adit-about-the-disclosure-of-rs-80-lakhs-as-income-has-no-evidentiary-value-as-stated-under-section-1324/20%Monthly2019-04-09 12:39
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-the-assessment-of-the-said-year-2001-02-was-completed-and-proceedings-for-re-assessment-were-initiated-under-section-148-and-a-notice-was-given-to-the-petitioner-to-explain-the-source/20%Monthly2019-03-30 11:34
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-where-a-private-company-had-unpaid-outstanding-tax-dues-such-dues-could-not-be-recovered-from-director-of-said-company-without-giving-her-opportunity-to-prove-that-non-recovery-of-tax-d/20%Monthly2018-12-24 10:00
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-where-income-on-which-tax-has-been-deducted-at-source-is-assessable-in-hands-of-a-person-other-than-deductee-credit-can-be-given-to-such-other-person-provided-three-conditions-contained/20%Monthly2019-01-02 06:46
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-where-income-tax-authorities-found-that-assessee-had-leased-out-his-property-to-his-own-family-members-to-show-lesser-income-in-his-hand-assessing-authorities-could-have-taxed-said-income-in-h/20%Monthly2019-01-02 07:03
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-dcit-circle-162-hereinafter-referred-to-as-the-assessing-officer-ao-as-well-as-the-order-dated-21st-march-2016-rejecting-the-objections-filed-by-the-petitioner/20%Monthly2019-03-30 12:20
https://taxcaselaw.com/himachal-pradesh-h-c-activities-of-call-centre-didnt-require-excise-registration-to-became-eligible-for-claiming-sec-80-ic-relief/20%Monthly2018-12-28 06:01
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-where-revenue-failed-to-establish-any-linkage-between-material-seized-from-assessees-premises-and-those-from-premises-of-upda-in-respect-of-illegal-payments-made-to-various-officials-and/20%Monthly2019-01-02 07:46
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-where-letting-of-building-together-with-fixtures-furnitures-etc-was-a-composite-one-rental-income-was-to-be-assessed-as-income-from-other-sources/20%Monthly2019-01-02 07:10
https://taxcaselaw.com/calcutta-h-c-appellate-tribunal-erred-in-law-in-allowing-the-deduction-under-section-80ggb-in-respect-of-donation-made-by-the-assessee-to-the-political-parties/20%Monthly2019-01-02 07:06
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-amount-of-exemption-of-sales-tax-payments-was-a-trading-receipt/20%Monthly2018-07-14 14:47
https://taxcaselaw.com/cestat-chennai-whether-said-product-was-classifiable-under-heading-no-8409-as-claimed-by-assessee-and-not-under-heading-no-8511-as-pleaded-by-revenu/20%Monthly2018-07-17 11:20
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-whether-petitioner-could-not-seek-directions-to-respondent-to-postpone-decision-to-implement-gst-for-simple-reason-that-said-implementation-was-without-parliamentary-sanction/20%Monthly2018-07-17 11:09
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-section-2263iii-only-requires-that-a-copy-of-notice-issued-under-section-2263i-to-bank-of-assessee-should-be-forwarded-to-assessee-and-not-that-a-copy-of-notice-should-be-served-on/20%Monthly2019-01-02 07:50
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-initiation-of-proceedings-under-section-2011-2011a-after-a-lapse-of-10-years-in-case-of-assessee-company-upheld-as-there-was-reasonable-explanation-for-delay/20%Monthly2019-01-04 12:51
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-where-there-was-a-mismatch-in-correct-pan-of-deductee-and-that-provided-by-deductor-department-was-not-justified-in-not-permitting-deductor-to-correct-pan-of-deductee-in-statement-of-ta/20%Monthly2019-01-02 10:58
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-where-satisfaction-notes-recorded-by-assessing-officer-of-assessee-and-assessing-officer-of-searched-person-were-identically-worded-carbon-copy-proceeding-could-not-be-initiated-against-a/20%Monthly2018-12-28 06:08
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-legal-expenditure-incurred-by-the-assessee-to-defend-the-writ-petition-filed-to-quash-the-government-notification-and-lease-deed-is-capital-expenditure-and-is-a-deduction-allowabl/20%Monthly2019-01-02 07:30
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-where-industrial-unit-had-separate-premises-separete-labour-force-separate-license-and-electricity-connection-and-value-of-machines-transferred-from-existing-unit-to-said-unit-was-with/20%Monthly2018-03-31 09:46
https://taxcaselaw.com/rajasthan-h-c-assessee-as-the-developer-and-thereby-allowing-deduction-u-s-80ib10-of-rs-10186533-ignoring-the-specific-development-agreement-entered-into-by-him-merely-as-land-owner-with-ano/20%Monthly2019-06-08 10:02
https://taxcaselaw.com/cestat-mumbai-where-assessee-provided-investment-advisory-services-to-customer-located-outside-india-and-claimed-for-refund-of-input-service-tax-lying-unutilized-since-assessee-had-filed-sufficient/20%Monthly2018-07-13 11:27
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-process-of-bottling-of-gas-into-cylinders-for-domestic-use-by-complex-technical-process-undertaken-in-plant-with-machinery-amounts-to-production-or-manufacture-of-gas-cylinders-for-purpos/20%Monthly2019-01-02 07:54
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-where-high-court-on-issue-of-grant-of-interest-under-section-244a-did-not-agree-with-earlier-view-expressed-by-coordinate-bench-of-same-high-court-appeal-was-remanded-back-to-high-court-for-afr/20%Monthly2019-01-03 12:29
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-where-high-court-had-given-direction-to-consider-application-for-compounding-mere-pendency-of-appeal-against-conviction-could-not-be-a-reason-for-refusing-consideration-of-issue-of-compo/20%Monthly2018-10-13 12:58
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-amount-paid-by-the-assessee-to-the-airport-authority-of-india-for-use-of-lounge-premises-by-way-of-royalty-was-not-tantamount-to-rent-within-the-meaning-of-section-194-i/20%Monthly2019-01-03 11:48
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-whether-the-income-tax-appellate-tribunal-was-correct-in-law-in-setting-aside-the-order-passed-under-section-2011-and-2011a-of-the-income-tax-act-1961/20%Monthly2019-01-03 11:44
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-itat-is-justified-in-holding-the-penalty-u-s-2211-is-to-be-imposed-in-respect-of-only-the-tax-excluding-interest-u-s-234a-234b-234c-without-appreciating-that-section-2211-does/20%Monthly2018-12-21 12:35
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-there-is-no-liability-to-collect-tax-at-source-under-section-206c1c-of-the-income-tax-act-1961-in-respect-of-octroi-collected-by-the-agent-appointed-by-the-assessee/20%Monthly2019-01-03 11:43