XML Sitemap

This is a XML Sitemap which is supposed to be processed by search engines which follow the XML Sitemap standard like Ask.com, Bing, Google and Yahoo.
It was generated using the WordPress content management system and the Google Sitemap Generator Plugin by Arne Brachhold.
You can find more information about XML sitemaps on sitemaps.org and Google's list of sitemap programs.

URLPriorityChange frequencyLast modified (GMT)
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-whether-the-income-tax-appellate-tribunal-was-justified-in-upholding-the-addition-made-on-the-basis-of-the-incriminating-material-found-during-the-search/20%Monthly2019-05-04 07:07
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-the-reassessment-proceedings-in-the-case-of-the-assessee-is-not-valid-under-law-in-light-of-the-fact-that-there-has-been-no-full-and-true-disclosure-of-material-necessary-for-assessment-d/20%Monthly2019-04-30 05:51
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-royalty-and-technical-assistance-fee-did-not-form-part-of-a-composite-transaction-and-have-to-be-treated-as-two-separate-transactions-for-the-purpose-of-benchmarking-and-computing-arms-len/20%Monthly2019-04-30 05:57
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-tribunal-was-justified-in-upholding-the-order-of-the-cita-in-deleting-the-addition-of-long-term-capital-gain-of-rs-8058000-on-the-ground-that-provisions-of-section-50c-of-the-it/20%Monthly2019-04-30 06:01
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-the-income-tax-appeal-under-section-260a-of-the-income-tax-act-1961-has-been-decided-by-the-high-court-without-framing-any-substantial-question-of-law-this-the-appellant-contends-is-impermis/20%Monthly2019-04-20 11:33
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-assessee-has-been-transferred-from-one-assessing-officer-in-tamil-nadu-to-another-assessing-officer-in-kerala-and-the-two-assessing-officers-are-not-subordinate-to-the-same-director-general-or/20%Monthly2019-04-20 11:29
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-the-assessee-has-not-understated-the-income-or-has-not-computed-excessive-loss-or-has-not-under-paid-the-tax-in-any-manner-shall-serve-on-the-assessee-a-notice-requiring-him-on-a-date-t/20%Monthly2019-05-04 07:29
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-honble-itat-was-right-in-law-in-directing-the-assessing-officer-to-compute-the-deduction-u-s-80-ia-by-following-the-method-in-section-80-hhc-3-for-working-out-profit-los/20%Monthly2019-04-30 06:05
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-the-assessees-are-attempting-the-wriggle-out-from-payment-of-capital-gain-tax-on-the-ground-that-it-was-a-slump-sale-within-the-meaning-of-section-242c/20%Monthly2019-04-30 06:32
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-tribunal-was-right-in-coming-to-the-conclusion-that-deduction-under-section-80-o-was-not-allowed-on-the-gross-receipts-but-only-on-that-part-of-receipts-which-form-part-of-the-total/20%Monthly2019-04-26 12:17
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-notice-invited-objections-to-the-proposed-transfer-under-section-1272-of-the-act-of-petitioners-income-tax-assessment-proceedings-case-from-mumbai-to-raipur-in-the-charge-of-commis/20%Monthly2019-05-08 07:55
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-assessee-was-not-entitled-to-claim-weighted-deduction-under-section-35b/20%Monthly2019-04-30 06:36
https://taxcaselaw.com/himachal-pradesh-h-c-where-in-respect-of-transfer-of-assessees-case-to-another-place-and-assessment-there-assessee-had-already-filed-a-statutory-appeal-before-commissioner-appeals-simultaneous/20%Monthly2019-01-02 12:21
https://taxcaselaw.com/calcutta-h-c-the-assessing-officer-in-original-assessment-order-dated-may-11-2009-passed-under-section-1433-of-the-act-erroneously-allowed-the-loss-of-rs-31702725-from-purchase-and-sale-o/20%Monthly2019-04-30 07:13
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-interest-earned-thereon-as-income-of-the-appellant-society-on-the-peculiar-facts-and-circumstances-of-the-case-and-also-when-the-appellant-was-clearly-guided-by-the-directions-of-t/20%Monthly2019-04-30 07:31
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-notice-issued-u-s-148-is-bad-in-law-and-be-set-aside/20%Monthly2019-04-20 12:23
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-the-value-adopted-or-assessed-or-assessable-by-the-stamp-valuation-authority-under-sub-section-1-exceeds-the-fair-market-value-of-the-property-as-on-the-date-of-transfer/20%Monthly2019-05-08 08:00
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-the-assessee-has-filed-the-return-of-income-for-a-y-2005-2006-on-31-10-2005-showing-total-income-of-rs-nil-after-claiming-deduction-of-rs-8690981-u-s-80ib10-of-the-income-tax-ac/20%Monthly2019-04-30 07:52
https://taxcaselaw.com/calcutta-h-c-whether-the-power-under-section-2542-can-be-exercised-in-the-case-of-a-mistake-apparent-on-the-part-of-the-litigant-or-his-advisors/20%Monthly2019-04-30 07:44
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-whether-the-appellate-tribunal-is-right-in-law-and-on-facts-in-allowing-the-deduction-claimed-by-the-assessee-u-s-80ib-10-of-the-income-tax-act/20%Monthly2019-04-30 07:35
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-where-assessing-officer-sought-to-reopen-assessment-on-ground-that-even-though-assessee-company-had-come-into-existence-from-30-8-2003-yet-it-claimed-depreciation-for-whole-year-resulti/20%Monthly2018-10-11 12:08
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-shares-have-been-purchased-by-appellant-to-acquire-controlling-interest-and-hence-not-allowable-deduction/20%Monthly2019-05-08 08:12
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-the-respondents-have-instead-of-confronting-the-petitioner-with-necessary-material-why-the-corporate-veil-should-be-lifted-and-section-179/20%Monthly2019-04-30 08:04
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-for-the-purpose-of-issuing-a-notice-under-section-153a1a-of-the-act-calling-upon-an-assessee-to-file-return-is-it-an-imperative-that-the-search-under-section-132-of-the-act-on-the-b/20%Monthly2019-05-04 07:32
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-the-petitioner-has-challenged-an-order-dated-25-6-1999-passed-by-the-settlement-commission-under-the-income-tax-act1961-for-short-the-act-determining-the-petitioners-liability-u/20%Monthly2019-05-23 05:52
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-provisions-of-chapter-x-of-the-income-tax-act-1961-for-short-the-act-were-not-applicable-to-the-international-transactions-undertaken-by-the-petitioner-as-they-were-n/20%Monthly2019-05-01 05:52
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-tribunal-was-justified-in-deleting-the-addition-of-mark-to-market-loss-of-rs-7810000-made-by-the-assessing-officer-on-account-of-disallowance-of-loss-on-foreign-exchange-forw/20%Monthly2019-05-04 07:37