XML Sitemap

This is a XML Sitemap which is supposed to be processed by search engines which follow the XML Sitemap standard like Ask.com, Bing, Google and Yahoo.
It was generated using the WordPress content management system and the Google Sitemap Generator Plugin by Arne Brachhold.
You can find more information about XML sitemaps on sitemaps.org and Google's list of sitemap programs.

URLPriorityChange frequencyLast modified (GMT)
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-non-compete-consideration-received-by-the-assessee-is-not-liable-to-tax-as-capital-gains-even-after-the-amendment-to-section-552a-of-the-act-w-e-f-1-4-1998-which-introduced-the-words/20%Monthly2019-06-29 07:17
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-assessing-officer-has-under-section-245-of-the-income-tax-act-1961-the-act-adjusted-the-demands-aggregating-to-rs-43-crore-for-the-assessment-years-2004-05-2007-08-and-2008-0/20%Monthly2019-06-29 07:23
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-the-excess-payment-refund-debited-in-the-profit-loss-account-of-the-appellant-under-the-head-indirect-expenses-should-be-treated-as-interest-on-the-customers-deposits-advances-is/20%Monthly2019-06-29 07:27
https://taxcaselaw.com/andhra-pradesh-h-c-the-honble-tribunal-itat-is-not-erroneous-and-perverse-in-law-in-cancelling-the-penalty-levied-under-section-2711c-of-the-income-tax-act-1961-when-the-respondent-assessee/20%Monthly2019-06-29 07:36
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-and-in-law-the-tribunal-has-erred-in-holding-that-interest-earned-on-nostro-a-c-is-taxable/20%Monthly2019-06-29 07:33
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-income-of-the-assessee-trust-fell-within-the-ambit-of-amended-provisions-of-section-2-15-of-the-act-and-that-the-assessee-trust-has-violated-the-provisions-of-section-13-1-c-of/20%Monthly2019-06-28 06:46
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-tribunal-is-justified-in-restricting-the-adjustment-only-on-international-transactions-where-the-assessee-has-selected-tnmm-and-applied-the-same-on-entity-level-because-presumption-un/20%Monthly2019-06-28 07:09
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-needs-to-be-decided-in-the-above-appeals-is-the-manner-in-which-the-additional-finance-charges-afc-also-known-as-overdue-charges-odc-has-to-be-taxed-in-the-light-of-section-145/20%Monthly2019-06-28 07:01
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-sugarcane-factory-societies-have-challenged-the-impugned-notices-under-section-148-of-the-income-tax-act-1961-hereinafter-referred-to-as-act-issued-by-the-concerned-assessing-offi/20%Monthly2019-07-01 12:36
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-whether-the-learned-appellate-tribunal-has-jurisdiction-to-extend-the-stay-granted-earlier-beyond-the-total-period-of-365-days-in-view-of-statutory-provisions-contained-in-section-35c2a/20%Monthly2019-07-01 12:29
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-assessee-is-called-upon-to-deliver-file-return-revised-return-in-the-prescribed-format-for-the-ay-2009-10/20%Monthly2019-06-29 07:40
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-amount-received-of-rs-3-4775000-by-the-assessee-from-l-t-the-developer-of-the-adjoining-land-in-respect-of-the-transfer-of-7575-37-square-meters-of-far-in-assessees/20%Monthly2018-12-11 07:38
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-tax-recovery-officer-could-not-have-examined-whether-the-transfer-was-void-under-section-281-of-the-income-tax-act/20%Monthly2019-06-28 07:25
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-tribunal-was-justified-in-law-in-upholding-the-application-of-section-68-in-respect-of-trade-credits-outstanding-at-the-end-of-the-year-on-account-of-purchases-when-the-purchases/20%Monthly2019-07-11 10:14
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-interest-earned-on-short-term-deposits-in-banks-were-only-investment-in-the-course-of-activity-of-providing-credit-facilities-to-members-and-that-the-same-cannot-be-considered-as-i/20%Monthly2019-06-29 07:55
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-reopening-of-assessment-is-bad-in-law-and-setting-aside-the-reassessment-proceedings/20%Monthly2019-06-28 07:36
https://taxcaselaw.com/andhra-pradesh-h-c-the-appellate-tribunal-was-justified-in-law-in-holding-that-the-assessee-was-entitled-to-claim-100-depreciation-on-the-centering-shuttering-material/20%Monthly2019-07-01 12:46
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-claim-of-the-petitioner-was-rejected-holding-that-the-petitioner-did-not-satisfy-the-definition-of-agricultural-credit-society-set-out-in-terms-of-the-explanation-to-section-80p4/20%Monthly2019-06-28 07:41
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-financial-year-1994-95-relevant-to-assessment-year-1995-96-constituted-the-initial-assessment-year-and-accordingly-the-appellant-was-not-entitled-to-deduction-under-section-80ib-f/20%Monthly2018-12-11 07:55
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-the-appellate-tribunal-was-right-in-upholding-the-order-of-the-cita-who-held-that-the-reassessment-proceedings-made-was-not-va/20%Monthly2019-06-28 08:01
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-whether-disallowance-made-by-the-assessing-officer-of-rs-7998870-would-amount-to-concealment-of-income-under-section-2711c-of-the-act/20%Monthly2019-06-26 11:23
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-appellate-tribunal-was-right-in-setting-aside-the-orders-of-the-lower-authorities-and-decide-the-issue-in-favour-of-the-assessee-even-though-interest-under-section-244a-has-not-been/20%Monthly2019-07-02 08:37
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-assessing-officer-is-not-justified-in-not-allowing-the-weighted-deduction-under-section-352ab/20%Monthly2019-07-02 08:29