XML Sitemap

This is a XML Sitemap which is supposed to be processed by search engines which follow the XML Sitemap standard like Ask.com, Bing, Google and Yahoo.
It was generated using the WordPress content management system and the Google Sitemap Generator Plugin by Arne Brachhold.
You can find more information about XML sitemaps on sitemaps.org and Google's list of sitemap programs.

URLPriorityChange frequencyLast modified (GMT)
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-whether-on-basis-of-an-audit-report-notice-under-section-148-could-not-be-issued-as-such-audit-report-could-not-be-regarded-as-information-within-meaning-of-section-147b-for-p/20%Monthly2018-09-25 07:25
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-an-assessee-is-given-the-benefit-of-deduction-under-sec-80ib-on-the-assessee-satisfying-the-conditions-mentioned-in-sub-sec-2-of-sec-80ib-can-the-assessee-be-denied-the-benefit-of-t/20%Monthly2018-09-25 07:29
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-whether-where-assessee-was-a-film-production-unit-which-was-not-formed-by-transfer-to-a-new-business-of-machinery-or-plant-previously-used-for-any-purpose-it-was-entitled-to-deduction-un/20%Monthly2018-09-25 07:35
https://taxcaselaw.com/telangana-and-andhra-pradesh-h-c-the-appellant-assessee-is-not-entitled-to-the-credit-of-tax-deducted-at-source-on-the-amounts-paid-on-sub-contract-works/20%Monthly2018-09-24 08:28
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-whether-where-petitioner-garnishee-had-objected-to-payment-and-had-filed-an-affidavit-stating-that-sum-demanded-or-any-part-thereof-was-not-due-to-assessee-no-further-proceeding-for-r/20%Monthly2018-09-24 08:23
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-investment-in-tax-free-securities-investments-are-represented-by-assessees-own-funds-in-the-shape-of-share-capital-and-reserves-ignoring-the-fact-that-the-assessee-is-a-bank-involv/20%Monthly2018-10-04 07:27
https://taxcaselaw.com/andhra-pradesh-h-c-a-contractual-liability-in-terms-of-agreement-between-the-assessee-company-and-the-conversion-unit-even-though-the-liability-to-assessee-company-arises-only-when-the-conversion/20%Monthly2018-09-24 08:38
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-service-rendered-by-non-resident-agent-could-at-best-be-called-as-a-service-for-completion-of-export-commitment-and-would-not-fall-within-definition-of-fees-for-technical-services/20%Monthly2018-09-25 07:48
https://taxcaselaw.com/andhra-pradesh-h-c-tribunal-could-not-refuse-to-address-assessees-plea-merely-by-stating-that-it-was-raised-for-first-time-before-tribunal/20%Monthly2018-09-25 07:41
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-the-itat-was-right-in-law-in-upholding-the-order-of-the-lower-authorities-in-not-allowing-set-off-of-business-loss-against-income-from-house-property-as-provided-under-section-70-of-the/20%Monthly2018-10-13 07:30
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-the-itat-for-restoring-the-order-of-the-assessing-officer-and-not-remanding-the-matter-are-legally-sufficient/20%Monthly2018-09-25 07:55
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-whether-itat-was-correct-in-law-in-allowing-deduction-u-s-10b-of-the-act-to-the-assessee/20%Monthly2018-10-13 07:44
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-honble-tribunal-was-correct-in-allowing-the-appeal-of-the-assessee-by-setting-aside-the-order-u-s-263-of-the-act-passed-by-the-cit/20%Monthly2018-09-24 08:46
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-income-from-inland-transport-of-cargo-within-india-was-covered-under-article-82bii-and-82c-of-the-tax-treaty-between-india-and-belgium-and-therefore-not-liable-to-tax-in-india/20%Monthly2018-09-25 08:12
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-assessing-officer-could-not-have-assessed-the-income-chargeable-to-tax-which-has-come-to-his-notice-subsequently-in-the-course-of-proceedings-under-section-147-though-was-no/20%Monthly2018-09-25 08:05
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-there-was-no-violation-of-section-115-as-till-will-was-probated-and-it-was-affirmed-that-will-was-genuine-trust-would-not-acquire-legal-right-on-foreign-shares/20%Monthly2018-09-25 08:00
https://taxcaselaw.com/andhra-pradesh-and-telangana-h-c-the-applicant-was-not-entitled-to-deduction-under-section-11-of-the-income-tax-act-1961-on-the-ground-that-the-applicant-corporation-carried-on-the-work-of-the-app/20%Monthly2018-09-24 10:31
https://taxcaselaw.com/telangana-and-andhra-pradesh-h-c-assessees-failure-to-explain-source-of-investment-for-earning-said-income-an-addition-of-rs-50-lakh-as-unexplained-investment-as-suggested-by-revenue/20%Monthly2018-09-25 08:27
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-reopening-of-assessment-proceedings-can-be-resisted-only-on-basis-of-reasons-recorded-at-time-of-issuing-notice-and-no-further-reasons-can-be-added-to-or-supplemented-to-support-reasons-r/20%Monthly2018-09-25 08:21
https://taxcaselaw.com/telangana-andhra-pradesh-h-c-second-respondent-would-pay-amount-to-company-in-liquidation-and-petitioner-on-one-hand-and-first-respondent-on-other-hand-would-be-entitled-to-submit-their-claims-bef/20%Monthly2018-09-25 08:33
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-cita-in-allowing-depreciation-on-sale-and-lease-back-transaction-with-hightemp-furnace-ltd-especially-when-not-for-sale-sign-was-affixed-on-the-assets/20%Monthly2018-10-13 12:08
https://taxcaselaw.com/telangana-andhra-pradesh-h-c-a-search-has-the-effect-of-only-reducing-the-losses-of-an-assessee-for-the-block-period-does-there-exists-an-occasion-to-levy-tax-on-the-undisclosed-income/20%Monthly2018-09-25 10:02
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-no-addition-can-be-made-for-gift-in-assessment-completed-under-section-153a-unless-some-incriminating-material-was-found-during-the-course-of-search-thus-ignoring-the-provisions-of-la/20%Monthly2018-09-25 09:56
https://taxcaselaw.com/andhra-pradesh-h-c-the-applicant-had-made-the-claim-for-deduction-of-the-power-tariff-relating-to-earlier-years-was-incorrectly-claimed-as-a-deduction-and-whether-the-alleged-incorrect-claim-was-app/20%Monthly2018-09-25 08:40
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-disallowance-on-bond-registration-charges-and-allowing-the-claim-of-the-assessee-u-s-371/20%Monthly2018-10-13 08:07
https://taxcaselaw.com/calcutta-h-c-officer-was-required-to-handover-seized-articles-to-income-tax-officer-having-jurisdiction-over-petitioners-within-a-period-of-15-days-of-such-seizure/20%Monthly2018-10-13 08:18
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-assessee-raised-a-claim-which-was-eventually-disallowed-did-not-mean-that-ingredients-of-clause-c-were-satisfied-so-as-to-justify-imposition-of-penalty-no-substantial-question-of-law-a/20%Monthly2018-10-13 08:12
https://taxcaselaw.com/andhra-pradesh-h-c-assessing-officer-having-allowed-interest-on-refund-to-assessee-passed-a-rectification-order-taking-a-view-that-said-interest-was-to-be-allowed-for-a-short-period-of-time-since/20%Monthly2018-09-25 10:36
https://taxcaselaw.com/telangana-andhra-pradesh-h-c-benefit-under-kar-vivad-samadhan-scheme-kvss-is-independent-of-merits-or-otherwise-of-claims-in-appeals-revision-or-other-proceedings/20%Monthly2018-09-25 10:31
https://taxcaselaw.com/telengana-andhra-pradesh-h-c-there-can-be-a-firm-in-existence-both-in-form-and-substance-and-it-is-immaterial-whether-the-object-of-the-firm-was-to-carry-on-business-in-real-estate-or-for-any-othe/20%Monthly2018-09-25 10:09
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-assessee-had-merely-outsourced-production-of-alcoholic-beverages-to-carry-on-its-business-more-efficiently-and-it-was-not-a-case-of-closure-of-business-assessees-claim-for-deduction-wa/20%Monthly2018-10-13 08:30
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-whether-penalty-imposed-for-concealment-of-income-was-to-be-deleted-where-high-court-admitted-substantial-question-of-law-on-issue-in-quantum-proceedings-on-basis-of-which-penalty-was-le/20%Monthly2018-09-24 10:36
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-advanced-money-to-assessee-company-in-which-one-director-of-assessee-was-holding-more-than-10-per-cent-equity-shares-since-assessee-itself-was-not-shareholder-of-those-lending-companies/20%Monthly2018-09-25 10:50
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-job-charges-are-integral-part-of-the-main-business-and-the-charges-received-for-job-undertaken-cannot-be-held-as-similar-to-the-word-charges-provided-in-clause-baa-of-explanation/20%Monthly2018-09-24 10:46
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-whether-an-order-passed-by-the-assessing-officer-on-the-objections-of-an-assessee-can-be-assailed-before-the-court-under-article-226-of-the-constitution-of-india/20%Monthly2018-10-13 10:20
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-pre-condition-of-notification-in-the-official-gazette-introduced-by-the-finance-act-1997-with-effect-from-april-1-1998-was-not-applicable-to-the-bonds-purchased-by-the-assessee-d/20%Monthly2018-10-13 08:55
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-transfer-pricing-officer-tpo-as-well-as-the-disputes-resolution-panel-drp-has-not-considered-its-functional-profile-while-determining-its-character-as-that-of-a-trader/20%Monthly2018-10-13 08:42
https://taxcaselaw.com/rajasthan-h-c-where-jewellery-found-in-possession-of-assessees-family-was-personal-wearing-of-ladies-and-same-was-within-permissible-limit-stipulated-by-cbdt-circular-no-addition-was-to-be-made/20%Monthly2018-11-17 08:23
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-the-assessee-had-been-granted-registration-earlier-and-all-these-facts-existed-at-that-time-despite-the-fact-that-while-passing-order-u-s-12-aa-3-the-cit-had-categorically-held-that/20%Monthly2018-09-24 10:54
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-an-order-passed-under-section-2011-or-1a-could-not-be-held-as-barred-by-limitation-on-ground-that-it-was-not-passed-within-four-years-from-end-of-relevant-financial-year-did-not-suff/20%Monthly2018-11-19 06:57
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-whether-on-facts-assessment-order-could-not-be-interfered-with-but-no-penalty-or-interest-should-be-levied-on-assessee/20%Monthly2018-11-19 06:34
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-expenditure-on-remuneration-and-training-of-working-director-is-not-allowable-under-section-37/20%Monthly2018-11-19 06:27
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-not-addressed-entire-aspects-concerning-validity-of-block-assessment-while-remanding-back-matter-to-tribunal-tribunal-could-entertain-another-ground-with-regard-to-validity-of-block-asse/20%Monthly2018-09-25 11:14
https://taxcaselaw.com/andhra-pradesh-h-c-failure-to-file-return-may-result-in-treating-such-income-as-undisclosed-one/20%Monthly2018-09-25 11:09
https://taxcaselaw.com/telangana-andhra-pradesh-h-c-whether-provisions-of-section-43b-are-applicable-to-interest-payable-on-purchase-duty/20%Monthly2018-09-25 11:05
https://taxcaselaw.com/andhra-pradesh-h-c-where-there-existed-a-hire-purchase-agreement-between-assessee-and-customer-revenue-could-not-on-a-deep-analysis-of-content-held-said-transaction-as-a-financial-arrangement-so/20%Monthly2018-09-25 11:00
https://taxcaselaw.com/andhra-pradesh-h-c-where-there-was-no-mala-fide-intention-on-part-of-assessee-in-not-showing-interest-written-off-by-bank-penalty-under-section-2711c-was-not-leviable/20%Monthly2019-07-04 11:52
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-deletion-of-penalty-imposed-upon-the-assessee-on-the-ground-that-it-had-filed-inaccurate-particulars-and-was-therefore-liable-under-section-2711c/20%Monthly2018-10-13 10:27
https://taxcaselaw.com/andhra-pradesh-h-c-claim-of-interest-on-borrowed-capital-was-disallowed-by-tribunal-in-earlier-assessment-years-but-tribunal-in-impugned-order-wrongly-relying-upon-decision-of-commissioner-appeals/20%Monthly2018-09-24 11:11
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-whether-on-facts-initiation-of-reassessment-proceedings-even-after-expiry-of-four-years-from-end-of-relevant-assessment-year-was-justified/20%Monthly2018-09-24 11:06
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-whether-did-the-income-tax-appellate-tribunal-fall-into-an-error-in-setting-aside-the-penalty-imposed-upon-the-assessee-under-section-2711c/20%Monthly2018-09-24 10:59
https://taxcaselaw.com/andhra-pradesh-h-c-where-reasons-cited-by-commissioner-appeals-was-satisfactory-with-respect-to-each-and-every-item-and-these-very-reasons-were-reiterated-by-tribunal-grievance-of-revenue-that-tr/20%Monthly2018-10-13 10:54
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-assessee-having-executed-an-agreement-to-sell-in-respect-of-a-house-property-purchased-a-new-residential-property-within-one-year-from-date-of-agreement-to-sell-and-subsequently-sale-deed-could/20%Monthly2018-11-19 07:05