XML Sitemap

This is a XML Sitemap which is supposed to be processed by search engines which follow the XML Sitemap standard like Ask.com, Bing, Google and Yahoo.
It was generated using the WordPress content management system and the Google Sitemap Generator Plugin by Arne Brachhold.
You can find more information about XML sitemaps on sitemaps.org and Google's list of sitemap programs.

URLPriorityChange frequencyLast modified (GMT)
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-entire-expenditure-incurred-by-the-assessee-on-production-of-programmes-which-became-part-of-news-archives-should-be-allowed-as-a-revenue-expense-under-section-37-of-the-income-tax-act/20%Monthly2018-12-21 10:25
https://taxcaselaw.com/aar-whether-on-the-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-and-in-law-payment-to-ms-geetha-kumararaja-hereinafter-referred-to-as-ms-geatha-in-her-bank-account-in-sri-lanka-of-monthly-remun/20%Monthly2018-12-04 08:09
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-where-in-pursuance-of-an-agreement-entered-into-between-assessee-and-tata-ibm-a-part-of-business-being-handled-by-erstwhile-tata-ibm-was-handed-over-to-assessee-company-due-to-bifurca/20%Monthly2018-11-17 07:11
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-whether-writ-jurisdiction-under-article-226-can-not-be-invoked-to-challenge-correctness-or-otherwise-of-notices-issued-under-section-148-and-proper-remedy-is-to-file-an-appeal-after-re/20%Monthly2018-10-04 07:21
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-where-assessees-claim-for-exemption-under-section-54b-was-thoroughly-scrutinized-and-assessing-officer-accepted-same-after-examination-of-all-details-assessment-proceeding-could-not-b/20%Monthly2018-11-17 07:21
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-assessee-failed-to-take-measures-for-protecting-property-or-interest-of-company-and-therefore-impugned-order-passed-by-tro-was-to-be-quashed/20%Monthly2018-10-04 07:14
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-pursuant-to-scheme-of-amalgamation-an-amalgamating-co-operative-society-cannot-carry-forward-and-set-off-its-accumulated-losses-against-profits-of-amalgamated-co-operative-society/20%Monthly2019-01-11 06:09
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-where-commissioner-appeals-not-only-examined-author-of-seized-document-but-also-allowed-assessing-officer-to-cross-examine-said-author-there-was-no-perversity-or-error-of-law-apparent/20%Monthly2018-12-21 11:45
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-no-penalty-for-cash-loans-exceeding-rs-20000-from-agriculturists-living-in-remote-areas-when-transaction-were-not-doubted/20%Monthly2018-11-23 05:37
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-where-in-terms-of-secondment-agreement-entered-into-by-assessee-with-overseas-companies-employees-of-those-companies-used-their-technical-knowledge-and-skills-while-assisting-assessee/20%Monthly2018-12-25 07:02
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-where-assessee-purchased-raw-materials-and-spares-from-its-holding-company-located-abroad-in-view-of-fact-that-assessee-did-not-constitute-agency-pe-of-holding-company-in-india-no-taxab/20%Monthly2018-12-21 11:48
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-the-cit-appeals-who-observed-the-order-passed-under-section-34-of-income-tax-act-1961-on-december-7-1987-remained-legally-valid-and-did-not-become-non-est-as-a-result-of-the/20%Monthly2018-12-04 07:37
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-allowing-registration-u-s-12aa-to-the-assessee-which-was-refused-by-the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vide-his-order-u-s-12aa1ii-dated-27-4-07/20%Monthly2018-09-17 13:09
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-assessee-would-be-entitled-to-adjust-actual-cost-of-imported-capital-asset-acquired-in-foreign-currency-on-account-of-fluctuation-in-rate-of-exchange-pending-actual-payment-of-varied-l/20%Monthly2018-12-04 07:02
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-where-assessing-officer-initiated-reassessment-proceedings-on-ground-that-assessee-had-claimed-deduction-of-certain-sum-on-account-of-fluctuation-of-rate-of-foreign-exchange-in-view-of/20%Monthly2018-12-04 07:27
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-the-business-of-the-assessee-remained-the-same-because-the-criterion-is-not-the-nature-of-business-but-the-unit-of-control-and-common-management/20%Monthly2018-11-17 07:32
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-whether-in-terms-of-the-contract-the-amount-receivable-received-in-respect-of-design-and-engineering-prepared-solely-for-manufacture-procurement-of-equipment-outside-india-and-being-ine/20%Monthly2018-11-23 07:01
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-assessing-officer-has-not-discharged-his-onus-in-proving-that-the-liability-has-ceased-in-the-year-under-consideration-ignoring-the-fact-that-the-assessee-had-not-only-faile/20%Monthly2018-09-17 13:14
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-where-there-was-short-duration-of-holding-of-shares-and-lack-of-clarity-in-account-books-sale-and-purchase-of-shares-would-lead-to-business-income-and-not-short-term-capital-gains/20%Monthly2018-12-04 06:55
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-where-assessee-an-event-management-company-paid-commission-to-a-foreign-agent-so-as-to-bring-certain-artists-to-india-in-view-of-fact-that-services-were-rendered-outside-india-by-agent/20%Monthly2018-12-04 07:03
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-where-instant-controversy-was-decided-by-division-bench-of-high-court-in-favour-of-assessee-in-earlier-assessment-years-appeal-on-same-issue-did-not-raise-any-substantial-question-of-la/20%Monthly2018-09-24 11:47
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-special-capital-incentive-given-to-assessee-by-state-government-to-enable-assessee-to-set-up-a-new-unit-in-state-would-be-capital-receipt/20%Monthly2018-12-04 07:05
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-the-two-lending-companies-who-have-advanced-interest-bearing-loan-to-the-appellant-have-done-so-not-in-the-ordinary-course-of-its-business-by-completely-overlooking-that-the-lending/20%Monthly2018-12-04 06:59
https://taxcaselaw.com/calcutta-h-c-the-commissioner-who-passed-the-relevant-order-relied-on-material-that-was-not-disclosed-in-the-show-cause-notice-and-thereby-acted-in-breach-of-the-principles-of-natural-justice/20%Monthly2018-11-23 07:15
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-short-term-capital-gain-for-2006-07-claimed-by-the-assessee-was-not-business-income/20%Monthly2018-11-26 06:17
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-assessee-was-not-entitled-to-exemption-under-section-10b-of-the-income-tax-act-particularly-when-the-assessee-originally-a-dta-unit-was-converted-as-100-eou-unit/20%Monthly2018-11-23 07:37
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-the-appellate-tribunal-has-substantially-erred-in-law-in-deleting-the-addition-made-under-section-69b-being-the-unexplained-investment-in-house-property/20%Monthly2018-11-23 07:28
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-cit-appeals-cancelling-the-penalty-imposed-on-the-assessee-for-concealment-of-income-under-section-2711c/20%Monthly2018-11-23 07:21
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-where-entire-amount-received-by-assessee-was-taxable-under-head-income-from-salaries-assessee-would-be-entitled-to-take-into-account-amount-of-tax-deductible-though-not-actually-dedu/20%Monthly2018-12-04 07:21
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-once-settlement-commission-has-completed-proceedings-its-order-is-considered-conclusive-as-regards-matters-stated-therein-per-section-245-i-and-reopening-any-proceeding-in-respect-of/20%Monthly2018-12-04 07:24
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-the-itat-was-correct-in-law-not-upholding-the-order-of-the-assessing-officer-wherein-the-addition-on-account-of-under-invoiced-sales-of-kattha-was-made-on-the-basis-of-material-in-the/20%Monthly2018-11-23 07:47
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-block-period-for-the-assessment-years-1994-95-1996-97-1998-99-1999-2000-and-2000-2001-though-the-return-of-income-had-been-filed-by-the-assessee-beyond-the-date-prescribed-und/20%Monthly2018-11-17 07:47
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-account-of-excess-stock-of-silver-especially-when-no-objection-was-raised-by-the-assessee-at-the-time-of-search-when-inventorisation-of-stock-took-place/20%Monthly2018-11-17 07:52
https://taxcaselaw.com/andhra-pradesh-h-c-whether-what-all-is-required-by-settlement-commission-at-stage-of-entertaining-application-is-whether-a-prima-facie-case-is-made-out-or-not-and-in-that-context-only-subsequent-am/20%Monthly2018-12-13 08:00
https://taxcaselaw.com/rajasthan-h-c-the-aac-was-competent-to-decide-the-appeal-of-the-assessee-against-the-original-order-of-assessment-dated-11-3-1974-even-though-the-same-has-been-set-aside-under-sec-263-of-the-i-t/20%Monthly2018-11-17 08:13
https://taxcaselaw.com/andhra-pradesh-h-c-when-transfer-of-capital-asset-is-complete-sale-consideration-has-to-be-taken-into-consideration-for-purpose-of-assessment-even-though-payment-of-consideration-deferred-till-othe/20%Monthly2018-11-23 07:54
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-whether-impugned-payment-was-a-capital-fee-and-thus-it-was-only-a-capital-receipt/20%Monthly2018-11-17 08:31
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-assessee-being-lease-rentals-paid-to-the-maharashtra-industrial-development-corporation-is-a-revenue-expenditure-is-valid-in-law/20%Monthly2018-11-23 08:29
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-the-itat-is-legally-justified-in-cancelling-the-penalty-levied-under-section-2711c-of-the-income-tax-act-irrespective-of-the-fact-that-the-assessee-claimed-excess-depreciation-to-t/20%Monthly2018-11-23 08:01
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-the-appellate-tribunal-is-right-in-considering-the-quotation-of-malaysian-oil-price-from-oil-world-which-is-an-independent-agency-of-germany-engaged-in-providing-forecasting-services/20%Monthly2019-01-11 06:12
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-the-appellate-tribunal-has-substantially-erred-in-restricting-the-extra-consumption-of-raw-materials-at-15-per-cent-as-against-40-per-cent-worked-out-by-the-assessing-officer-even-afte/20%Monthly2019-01-11 05:40
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-whether-question-of-agency-being-a-question-of-fact-could-not-be-resolved-by-merely-applying-reasoning-adopted-by-tribunal-in-some-other-case-but-had-to-be-answered-with-reference-to-fact/20%Monthly2018-11-17 11:15
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-appellants-assessees-were-not-entitled-to-deduction-of-10-per-cent-of-the-aggregate-average-advances-made-by-its-rural-branches-under-section-361viia/20%Monthly2018-11-23 08:41
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-assessee-being-a-notified-person-under-the-special-court-trial-of-offences-relating-to-transactions-in-securities-act1992-is-not-liable-to-pay-interest-u-s-234-a-234-b-and-234-c/20%Monthly2018-11-23 09:47
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-where-tribunal-in-impugned-order-had-just-followed-its-own-earlier-view-and-that-too-in-relation-to-same-assessee-appeal-against-order-of-tribunal-did-not-raise-any-substantial-question/20%Monthly2019-01-11 06:21
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-where-assessee-offered-incentive-to-distributors-stockists-on-meeting-of-sales-target-on-principal-to-principal-basis-that-incentive-could-not-be-treated-as-commission-payment-under-sect/20%Monthly2018-12-04 07:20