XML Sitemap

This is a XML Sitemap which is supposed to be processed by search engines which follow the XML Sitemap standard like Ask.com, Bing, Google and Yahoo.
It was generated using the WordPress content management system and the Google Sitemap Generator Plugin by Arne Brachhold.
You can find more information about XML sitemaps on sitemaps.org and Google's list of sitemap programs.

URLPriorityChange frequencyLast modified (GMT)
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-where-assessment-was-completed-prior-to-1-6-2003-provisions-of-section-234d-could-not-be-applied/20%Monthly2018-10-05 06:47
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-where-information-regarding-all-transactions-were-not-subject-matter-of-earlier-reassessment-proceedings-and-details-provided-fresh-material-for-assessing-officer-to-initiate-second-reasse/20%Monthly2018-10-12 10:58
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-notice-u-s-1432-in-tribunal-set-aside-case-must-be-within-statutory-time-limit/20%Monthly2018-04-02 11:22
https://taxcaselaw.com/madhya-pradesh-h-c-filing-of-application-u-s-1023c-can-be-done-earlier-or-in-advance/20%Monthly2018-04-02 11:22
https://taxcaselaw.com/andhra-pradesh-h-c-where-settler-of-assessee-trust-gave-a-property-to-trust-which-was-subject-to-first-charge-under-estate-duty-act-in-view-of-fact-that-on-acquisition-of-said-property-entire-compe/20%Monthly2018-04-02 11:23
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-charging-a-nominal-fees-by-assessee-society-from-beneficiaries-to-use-coding-system-and-to-avail-advantages-and-benefits-therein-was-neither-reflective-of-business-aptitude-nor-indicative/20%Monthly2018-03-31 03:33
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-not-deciding-the-issue-which-was-before-it-namely-whether-rs-39511874-being-the-excise-duty-on-raw-material-consumed-during-the-year-is-allowable-u-s-371-as-claimed-by-the-respond/20%Monthly2018-04-05 07:17
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-where-there-is-more-than-one-authorisation-starting-point-of-limitation-is-to-be-computed-from-last-of-authorisation-which-as-per-explanation-2-to-sub-section-2-of-section-158be-is-dee/20%Monthly2018-04-11 13:10
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-net-conversion-charges-has-to-be-included-under-clause-baa-of-explanation-to-section-80-hhc-of-the-act/20%Monthly2018-03-31 03:32
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-demurrage-and-dead-freight-are-to-be-allowed-while-calculating-the-relief-under-sec-80-hhc/20%Monthly2018-03-31 03:28
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-if-a-business-liability-has-definitely-arisen-in-the-accounting-year-the-deduction-should-be-allowed-although-the-liability-may-have-to-be-quantified-and-discharged-at-a-future-date/20%Monthly2018-03-31 03:31
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-where-export-commission-were-paid-outside-india-to-non-resident-prior-to-applicability-of-circular-no-7-of-2009-same-was-not-chargeable-to-tax-in-india-under-section-91vii/20%Monthly2018-04-09 03:57
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-free-sample-distribution-expenses-were-allowable-under-section-371-even-though-there-was-no-effective-sale-during-year/20%Monthly2018-11-14 06:18
https://taxcaselaw.com/rajasthan-h-c-merely-because-books-of-account-of-assessee-were-rejected-or-estimated-addition-was-made-no-penalty-is-leviable-under-section-2711c/20%Monthly2018-03-31 03:24
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-amount-forfeited-by-assessee-on-cancellation-of-agreements-of-sale-of-its-two-manufacturing-units-in-excess-of-that-mentioned-in-agreements-would-be-revenue-receipt/20%Monthly2018-03-31 03:26
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-whether-interest-is-payable-by-the-revenue-to-the-assessee-if-the-aggregate-of-installments-of-advance-tax-of-tds-paid-exceeds-the-assessed-tax/20%Monthly2018-09-17 07:46
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-where-change-in-method-of-valuing-closing-stock-adopted-by-assessee-was-a-recognized-method-and-it-had-also-been-followed-consistently-in-subsequent-assessment-years-any-addition-on-a/20%Monthly2018-03-31 03:21
https://taxcaselaw.com/gauhati-h-c-where-basic-object-of-trust-was-to-provide-and-maintain-educational-institutions-in-country-approval-under-section-1023cvi-could-not-be-denied/20%Monthly2018-03-31 03:17
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-finding-whether-charterer-is-the-beneficiary-of-the-freight-or-the-owner-of-the-ship-is-finding-of-fact/20%Monthly2018-03-31 03:21
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-whether-first-proviso-to-section-147-specifically-restricts-power-to-reassess-only-in-cases-where-assessee-fails-to-make-a-return-inter-alia-in-response-to-notice-under-section-1421/20%Monthly2018-10-05 06:50
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-matter-cannot-be-referred-to-valuation-officer-under-section-142a-by-assessing-officer-without-rejecting-books-of-account/20%Monthly2018-04-10 03:43
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-whether-the-retiring-partner-would-be-liable-to-pay-for-the-capital-gains/20%Monthly2018-04-10 03:45
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-conveyance-additional-conveyance-allowance-and-incentive-bonus-is-taxable-being-perquisite/20%Monthly2018-03-31 03:13
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-where-assessee-claimed-to-set-off-certain-amount-toward-miscellaneous-receipt-but-failed-to-produce-any-material-to-support-claim-with-regard-to-miscellaneous-receipts-and-also-failed/20%Monthly2018-04-11 13:09
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-where-search-and-seizure-operation-were-carried-out-against-assessee-on-receipt-of-information-from-national-agency-which-was-responsible-for-collecting-information-related-to-suspect/20%Monthly2018-03-31 03:15
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-where-assessee-claimed-depreciation-on-non-existent-assets-penalty-was-to-be-levied-for-filing-inaccurate-particulars-of-income/20%Monthly2018-04-11 13:04
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-itat-is-justified-in-law-and-on-facts-in-putting-reliance-on-the-cbdts-circular-no-786-dated-07-02-2000-whereas-no-cognizance-has-been-taken-of-the-boards-circular-no-30-2009-dated/20%Monthly2018-10-12 10:44
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-where-assessing-officer-during-course-of-original-assessment-proceedings-delved-deep-into-question-of-deduction-under-section-80hhf-and-was-satisfied-that-deduction-made-were-as-per-law/20%Monthly2018-03-31 02:39
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-in-view-of-fact-that-fresh-proceedings-were-initiated-by-mandi-board-holding-assessee-liable-for-payment-of-additional-fee-and-interest-matter-needed-readjudication/20%Monthly2018-03-31 03:11
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-where-assessee-admitted-undisclosed-income-found-during-search-and-he-was-ready-to-make-payment-of-tax-no-penalty-was-to-be-levied/20%Monthly2018-04-09 03:56
https://taxcaselaw.com/jammu-kashmir-h-c-where-assessee-received-certain-inter-corporate-deposits-from-its-sister-concern-in-view-of-fact-that-one-of-shareholders-was-holding-shares-in-excess-of-20-per-cent-in-both-com/20%Monthly2018-04-10 03:45
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-itat-has-erred-in-not-deciding-whether-or-not-the-loss-suffered-was-speculative-loss-in-view-of-explanation-to-section-73-of-the-income-tax-act-1961/20%Monthly2018-10-12 10:43
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-and-in-law-an-investment-made-in-the-shares-of-a-private-limited-company-for-purposes-of-acquiring-control-over-the-business-con/20%Monthly2018-04-10 03:47
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-whether-sub-section-2a-as-inserted-in-section-92ca-is-prospectively-effective-from-1-6-2011-and-it-is-prospective-qua-proceedings-and-not-qua-assessment-year-which-means-if-proceedings/20%Monthly2018-04-10 03:40
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-amendment-made-in-section-40aia-by-finance-act-2010-was-retrospective-in-nature/20%Monthly2018-04-11 13:00
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-where-assessee-became-entitled-to-refund-of-taxes-paid-and-interest-under-section-244a-had-become-due-and-payable-on-tax-amount-refundable-and-assessing-officer-did-not-make-payment-of-int/20%Monthly2019-05-17 08:35
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-the-communication-of-dismissal-of-the-assessees-writ-petition-against-the-proceedings-initiated-under-section-158bc-of-the-income-tax-act-1961-was-made-to-the-assessing-officer-on/20%Monthly2018-10-12 11:17
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-grant-of-subsidy-by-holding-company-to-secure-and-protect-capital-investment-made-by-it-in-assessee-company-would-be-capital-receipt-in-assessees-hands/20%Monthly2018-03-31 02:38
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-whether-section-194c-would-apply-in-respect-of-supply-of-printed-material-as-per-prescribed-specifications/20%Monthly2018-03-30 05:23
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-the-expenses-and-depreciation-on-guest-house-was-allowable-and-the-provisions-of-section-37-4-of-the-act-were-not-attracted/20%Monthly2019-05-15 11:08
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-the-expenses-and-depreciation-on-guest-house-was-allowable-and-the-provisions-of-section-37-4-of-the-act-were-not-attracted-2/20%Monthly2019-05-17 08:15
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-merely-because-shares-were-issued-belatedly-in-subsequent-year-share-application-money-cannot-be-treated-as-loan-or-deposits-or-advance-for-invoking-provisions-of-section-222e/20%Monthly2019-05-17 06:58
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-ao-couldnt-apply-rule-8d-blindly-despite-assessees-contentions-that-no-expenditure-was-incurred-to-earn-exempt-income/20%Monthly2019-05-17 07:06
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-the-3rd-member-order-has-in-reference-merely-confined-to-the-legal-issue-in-question-whereas-no-such-embargo-was-contained-in-the-reference-order-by-the-ld-president-itat-as-repr/20%Monthly2018-10-12 11:00
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-where-capital-gain-arose-out-of-long-term-capital-asset-was-invested-in-specified-assets-exemption-under-section-54ec-could-not-be-denied-on-account-of-fact-that-deeming-fiction-of-shor/20%Monthly2018-04-11 12:52
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-tribunal-has-comprehensive-jurisdiction-which-gives-discretion-to-allow-a-new-ground-to-be-raised-2/20%Monthly2019-05-15 11:05
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-tribunal-has-comprehensive-jurisdiction-which-gives-discretion-to-allow-a-new-ground-to-be-raised/20%Monthly2019-05-15 11:03