XML Sitemap

This is a XML Sitemap which is supposed to be processed by search engines which follow the XML Sitemap standard like Ask.com, Bing, Google and Yahoo.
It was generated using the WordPress content management system and the Google Sitemap Generator Plugin by Arne Brachhold.
You can find more information about XML sitemaps on sitemaps.org and Google's list of sitemap programs.

URLPriorityChange frequencyLast modified (GMT)
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-whether-it-is-immaterial-for-purpose-of-filing-an-application-before-settlement-commission-whether-time-limit-for-issuing-notice-under-section-1432-has-expired-or-not/20%Monthly2018-12-01 06:25
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-where-loss-in-respect-of-bad-debt-written-off-on-account-of-loan-given-to-a-subsidiary-company-was-rejected-in-view-of-legal-position-which-was-against-assessee-and-not-because-of-state/20%Monthly2018-04-03 10:49
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-no-tds-need-be-deducted-in-respect-of-a-sum-of-rs-5473643-where-gifts-like-car-gold-silver-etc-were-distributed-to-3rd-parties-under-price-scheme-without-taking-into-considerat/20%Monthly2019-05-17 06:57
https://taxcaselaw.com/madhya-pradesh-h-c-where-assessing-officer-made-addition-to-assessees-income-in-respect-of-certain-amount-received-from-p-by-invoking-provisions-of-section-222e-in-view-of-fact-that-said/20%Monthly2018-04-03 10:51
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-whether-the-honble-tribunal-has-erred-in-law-in-holding-that-there-was-no-deemed-gift-within-the-meaning-of-section-41c-of-the-gift-tax-act-in-respect-of-the-interest-amount-of/20%Monthly2018-04-03 10:53
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-where-order-under-section-271g-did-not-mention-which-document-or-information-mentioned-in-notice-under-section-92d3-was-not-furnished-by-assessee-penalty-under-section-271g-could-not-be-susta/20%Monthly2019-05-15 11:08
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-in-view-of-provisions-of-section-1336-as-amended-by-finance-act-1995-assessing-authority-is-empowered-to-issue-notice-calling-for-general-information-for-purpose-of-any-enquiry-even-in-a-ca/20%Monthly2019-05-18 11:40
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-tribunal-was-legally-correct-in-upholding-the-order-of-the-assessing-officer-without-adverting-to-the-evidence-and-material-brought-on-record-by-the-assessee/20%Monthly2018-04-10 03:49
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-where-assessing-officer-did-not-complete-assessment-within-period-of-one-year-any-interest-liability-for-period-beyond-that-one-year-could-not-be-foisted-on-assessee-unless-delay-in-not-c/20%Monthly2018-10-12 10:56
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-provision-for-bad-and-doubtful-debts-are-in-principle-allowable-deduction/20%Monthly2019-05-17 08:10
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-expenditure-for-laying-fixing-marble-flooring-is-not-covered-under-current-repairs-as-defined-in-section-30aii-of-the-income-tax-act-1961-read-with-the-explanation/20%Monthly2018-12-01 06:32
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-reassessment-abandoned-where-reasons-recorded-for-reassessment-did-not-indicate-as-to-how-and-why-income-had-escaped-assessment-and-now-in-view-of-article-5-of-dtaa-with-korea-concerned-p/20%Monthly2019-01-05 11:06
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-income-tax-appellate-tribunal-was-justified-in-disallowing-actual-warranty-expenses-of-rs-1253441-and-rs-4854522-on-account-of-provision-for-warranty/20%Monthly2019-01-05 12:09
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-tribunal-was-justified-in-law-in-rejecting-claim-of-assessee-that-property-continuing-to-be-in-self-occupation-of-assessee-even-after-collaboration-agreement-with-a-builder-was-to-be-va/20%Monthly2019-06-08 12:38
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-1-3rd-share-in-the-property-no-6-aurengzeb-road-continuing-to-be-in-self-occupation-of-the-assessee-even-after-the-collaboration-agreement-dated-2-5-84-with-m-s-ansal-properties-and-indu/20%Monthly2019-05-17 08:17
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-assessee-was-eligible-for-deduction-under-section-10a-without-considering-the-mandatory-conditions-to-decide-eligibility-to-claim-deduction-stipulated-under-sections-10-a-2ib-and/20%Monthly2018-11-07 11:22
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-the-tribunal-is-justified-in-law-in-deleting-the-penalty-of-rs-3430000-levied-u-s-272-b-of-the-act-by-ignoring-that-there/20%Monthly2018-12-21 12:17
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-where-a-company-transferred-its-entire-undertaking-engaged-in-export-business-of-medical-transcription-to-assessee-and-said-company-had-benefit-of-section-10a-in-respect-of-said-undertaki/20%Monthly2019-05-16 07:18
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-assessee-was-not-guilty-of-furnishing-inaccurate-particulars-of-income-were-made-without-properly-appreciating-the-facts-available-on-record-2/20%Monthly2019-05-17 08:26
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-assessee-was-not-guilty-of-furnishing-inaccurate-particulars-of-income-were-made-without-properly-appreciating-the-facts-available-on-record/20%Monthly2019-05-17 08:21
https://taxcaselaw.com/tripura-h-c-benefit-of-clause-26-of-section-10-will-be-available-to-members-of-scheduled-tribe-only-residing-in-any-areas-specified-in-said-section/20%Monthly2019-05-18 10:27
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-transmission-of-shares-by-the-appellant-to-its-wholly-owned-subsidiary-company-would-amount-to-transfer-and-that-there-was-a-deemed-gift-involved-therein/20%Monthly2018-11-07 11:38
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-disallowance-of-deduction-of-rs-88478097-made-under-section-80-ic-is-to-be-allowed/20%Monthly2019-01-07 10:57
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-in-terms-of-provisions-contained-in-section-68-any-amount-other-than-one-found-credited-in-books-of-account-can-not-be-estimated-and-charged-to-tax/20%Monthly2018-04-03 10:53
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-where-assessee-exporter-paid-buyers-commission-for-procuring-export-orders-and-genuineness-of-payment-was-established-commission-was-deductible-as-business-expenditure/20%Monthly2018-04-03 10:55
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-where-assessee-paid-conveyance-maintenance-reimbursement-expenditure-allowance-and-monetary-subsidy-under-holiday-home-scheme-to-its-employees-and-it-paid-fbt-on-said-payments-p/20%Monthly2018-11-07 12:54
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-addition-cannot-be-made-solely-relying-upon-report-of-dvo/20%Monthly2019-01-05 12:26
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-where-sales-tax-liability-was-converted-into-a-loan-within-relevant-previous-year-assessee-was-entitled-to-claim-deduction-for-same/20%Monthly2019-01-05 12:25
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-as-issue-of-allowance-of-non-compete-fee-as-revenue-expenditure-or-capital-expenditure-was-debatable-disallowance-of-assessees-claim-could-not-be-a-ground-to-impose-penalty-under-sectio/20%Monthly2019-01-07 11:00
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-non-disclosure-of-related-party-transactions-in-audit-report-under-section-12a1b-would-warrant-special-audit/20%Monthly2018-04-03 10:56
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-treating-the-donations-as-voluntary-whereas-the-a-o-on-test-check-basis-found-that-the-donations-were-not-voluntary-and-made-the-additions-u-s-68-of-the-i-t-act-1961-as-explained-cash/20%Monthly2018-11-14 06:11
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-writ-petitions-cannot-be-entertained-when-alternative-remedy-of-filing-appeal-before-commissioner-appeals-is-available/20%Monthly2019-01-07 10:51
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-where-assessee-claimed-deduction-under-section-80-ib-in-respect-of-income-surrendered-during-search-proceedings-on-ground-that-it-had-direct-and-proximate-connection-with-busine/20%Monthly2019-06-08 12:23
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-appellant-was-not-entitled-to-the-deduction-under-section-80-ib-on-the-surrendered-amount-though-utilized-for-the-business-of-the-appellant-without-placing-any-evidence-agai/20%Monthly2019-05-17 08:19
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-itat-has-erred-in-law-in-upholding-the-order-of-cit-a-without-taking-into-account-the-fact-that-after-conversion-to-free-hold-superior-rights-accrued-to-the-assessee/20%Monthly2018-10-12 10:51
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-where-export-turnover-of-an-assessee-exceeds-rs-10-crores-he-does-not-get-benefit-of-addition-of-ninety-per-cent-of-export-incentive-under-section-28iiid-to-his-export-profits-but-get-higher/20%Monthly2019-05-17 08:24
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-where-export-turnover-of-an-assessee-exceeds-rs-10-crores-he-does-not-get-benefit-of-addition-of-ninety-per-cent-of-export-incentive-under-section-28iiid-to-his-export-profits-but-get-highe/20%Monthly2019-01-11 06:36
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-where-assessee-a-development-officer-of-lic-received-incentive-bonus-prior-to-1-4-1989-and-claimed-deduction-of-40-per-cent-of-same-stating-that-he-had-incurred-expenditure-to-extent-of-40-per/20%Monthly2018-12-21 12:19
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-while-accepting-or-rejecting-an-application-under-section-273a-a-commissioner-is-required-to-confine-his-consideration-to-factors-enumerated-in-section-273a-only/20%Monthly2018-04-11 12:46