XML Sitemap

This is a XML Sitemap which is supposed to be processed by search engines which follow the XML Sitemap standard like Ask.com, Bing, Google and Yahoo.
It was generated using the WordPress content management system and the Google Sitemap Generator Plugin by Arne Brachhold.
You can find more information about XML sitemaps on sitemaps.org and Google's list of sitemap programs.

URLPriorityChange frequencyLast modified (GMT)
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-amendment-made-to-section-115jb-by-finance-no-2-act-2009-by-insertion-of-clause-i-to-explanation-1-with-retrospective-effect-from-1-4-2001-is-constitutionally-valid/20%Monthly2018-12-21 12:04
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-where-assessing-officer-completed-assessment-of-assessee-under-section-1433-and-subsequently-he-reopened-said-assessment-solely-on-basis-of-objection-of-audit-party-without-application/20%Monthly2018-12-21 11:56
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-the-additional-information-made-available-to-this-court-and-in-the-circumstances-of-this-case-the-land-acquired-is-not-an-agricultural-land-and-theref/20%Monthly2018-12-21 11:53
https://taxcaselaw.com/andhra-pradesh-h-c-where-revenue-was-not-able-to-establish-that-royalty-paid-by-assessee-was-unreasonable-same-was-to-be-inferred-as-adequate-and-reasonable-coming-within-clause-c-of-sub-section/20%Monthly2018-11-14 09:15
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-mere-furnishing-of-the-bank-statements-of-the-share-subscribers-without-any-explanation-for-the-deposits-in-the-accounts-may-not-meet-the-requirements-of-section-68/20%Monthly2018-04-02 02:07
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-registration-had-been-granted-to-the-trust-if-the-application-was-not-either-accepted-or-rejected-within-a-period-of-six-months-from-the-end-of-the-month-in-which-such-application-was/20%Monthly2018-11-14 09:31
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-where-shares-of-indian-company-are-listed-shares-exempted-under-section-1038-no-treaty-shopping-to-be-alleged-on-transfer-of-shareholding-in-it-by-company-of-one-foreign-country-to-comp/20%Monthly2019-06-08 12:15
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-approval-granted-by-director-of-stpi-is-sufficient-for-purpose-of-section-10a/20%Monthly2018-11-17 11:17
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-penalty-proceedings-initiated-against-the-assessee-under-section-2711c/20%Monthly2019-07-16 07:49
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-benefit-of-deduction-under-section-80hhc-of-the-act-can-be-availed-by-the-assessee-only-on-the-total-income-as-computed-after-setting-off-the-unabsorbed-depreciation-of-the-earlier/20%Monthly2019-07-10 07:25
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-respondent-was-a-resident-of-india-whereas-the-tribunal-has-erred-in-holding-that-the-respondent-assessee-was-not-residing-in-india/20%Monthly2019-07-15 10:03
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-tribunal-was-correct-in-holding-that-comparable-selected-by-the-tpo-were-not-functionally-comparable-while-determining-alp/20%Monthly2018-04-02 02:02
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-amount-of-arbitral-award-which-has-been-invested-in-a-fixed-deposit-of-a-bank-and-interest-earned-thereon-cannot-be-regarded-as-income-which-has-accrued-unless-and-until-proceedings-relat/20%Monthly2018-12-21 12:06
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-deductions-under-section-40aia-although-the-tax-at-source-is-not-deducted-as-required-under-section-194c-and-not-paid-within-the-stipulated-time-as-required-under-section-2001/20%Monthly2018-11-22 10:16
https://taxcaselaw.com/andhra-pradesh-h-c-where-assessee-nbfc-made-investment-in-shares-from-its-own-funds-valued-closing-stock-of-shares-consistently-at-cost-earned-substantial-dividend-income-and-never-claimed-set-off/20%Monthly2018-11-14 09:31
https://taxcaselaw.com/rajasthan-h-c-the-trust-was-not-satisfying-the-essential-conditions-for-exemption-under-section-1023c/20%Monthly2019-07-16 06:36
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-physical-structuring-of-the-new-residential-house-whether-it-is-lateral-or-vertical-does-not-matter-for-section-54f/20%Monthly2018-04-02 01:59
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-the-leaned-itat-was-justified-in-deleting-the-dis-allowance-of-equivalent-of-interest-on-borrowed-capital-to-the-debit-balances-existing-in-the-name-of-directors-on-the-ground-that-no/20%Monthly2019-07-16 11:55
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-notices-under-section-148-of-the-income-tax-act-1961-the-act-in-relation-to-a-ys-2005-06-and-2006-07-have-admittedly-been-issued-beyond-a-period-of-four-years-of-the-end-of-the/20%Monthly2019-07-10 08:24
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-evidence-filed-by-the-assessee-was-believable-and-therefore-onus-was-shifted-to-the-revenue-to-prove-that-the-item-sold-were-not-personal-effects-of-the-assessee/20%Monthly2019-06-08 12:13
https://taxcaselaw.com/calcutta-h-c-where-assessing-officer-did-not-make-provision-for-disallowance-of-interest-expenditure-under-section-14a-commissioner-appeals-was-justified-in-revising-said-order/20%Monthly2018-11-07 11:28
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-commissioner-could-not-transfer-assessees-case-from-one-jurisdiction-to-another-jurisdiction-merely-on-ground-of-co-ordinated-investigation-without-recording-any-reasons-therefor/20%Monthly2019-01-05 11:18
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-benefit-of-deduction-under-section-80hhc-of-the-act-can-be-availed-by-the-assessee-only-on-the-total-income-as-computed-after-setting-off-the-unabsorbed-depreciation-of-the-earlier-2/20%Monthly2019-07-10 08:34
https://taxcaselaw.com/calcutta-h-c-where-assessing-officer-did-not-consider-the-requirement-of-section-14a-action-of-cit-u-s-263-is-correct/20%Monthly2018-03-29 12:37
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-tribunal-was-right-in-deleting-the-additions-under-section-40a3-by-applying-the-exemption-rule-6ddi-when-the-assessee-has-not-proved-that-i-the-payee-had-acted-as-agents-of-the/20%Monthly2018-12-21 13:09
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-whether-the-tribunal-was-correct-in-reversing-the-findings-of-the-assessing-officer-that-for-the-purpose-of-computing-deduction-under-section-80hhe-of-the-assistant-commissioner-out-o/20%Monthly2019-07-16 12:25
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-rental-income-should-be-assessed-under-the-head-income-from-business-and-not-under-the-head-income-from-house-property/20%Monthly2019-01-05 12:06
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-whether-the-adoption-of-rs-648000-as-the-full-sale-consideration-of-the-property-relying-on-the-confession-statement-of-the-purchasers-without-furnishing-the-appellant-copy-of-such-inf/20%Monthly2019-07-16 10:36
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-notices-issued-under-section-148-all-dated-16-12-2011-intending-to-re-open-assessments-pertaining-to-the-assessment-years-2005-06-to-2008-09/20%Monthly2019-07-10 08:45
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-warranty-liability-is-only-a-provision-for-unascertained-liability/20%Monthly2018-11-14 08:06
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-a-tax-demand-in-pursuance-of-rectification-order-passed-after-four-years-from-end-of-year-in-which-assessment-is-completed-will-be-time-barred/20%Monthly2019-01-05 11:14
https://taxcaselaw.com/andhra-pradesh-h-c-where-a-french-company-incorporated-to-serve-as-an-investment-vehicle-of-foreign-direct-investment-in-india-transferred-its-interest-in-indian-concern-to-another-french-company/20%Monthly2018-11-14 08:02
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-where-issue-decided-by-commissioner-appeals-was-under-challenge-before-tribunal-said-decision-cannot-be-relied-for-staying-appeal-before-commissioner-appeals-for-current-year-2/20%Monthly2018-11-07 11:26
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-shares-of-shanh-were-held-by-two-french-companies-namely-md-and-gima-a-share-purchase-agreement-spa-was-entered-into-between-md-gima-and-sanofi-a-french-company-in-terms-of-which-s/20%Monthly2018-11-14 08:03
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-where-issue-decided-by-commissioner-appeals-was-under-challenge-before-tribunal-said-decision-cannot-be-relied-for-staying-appeal-before-commissioner-appeals-for-current-year/20%Monthly2018-03-29 12:37
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-income-tax-tribunal-is-right-in-law-in-deleting-the-interest-accrued-on-non-performing-assets-from-the-computation-of-the-taxable-income-for-the-assessment-year-1999-2000-and-2000-20/20%Monthly2019-07-16 11:22
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-assessee-had-not-made-a-full-and-true-disclosure-of-material-facts-necessary-for-assessment-on-the-contrary-purported-reasons-indicated-that-amount-mentioned-therein-had-been-shown-in-boo/20%Monthly2018-09-20 16:22
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-itat-was-right-in-law-in-deleting-the-levy-of-penalty-by-the-assessing-officer-under-section-271d-of-the-income-tax-act-1961-even-though-the-advance-has-been-accounted-as-loan-and-i/20%Monthly2018-11-14 07:50
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-whether-the-tribunal-is-correct-in-confirming-the-rectification-order-passed-by-the-respondent-for-the-above-assessment-year-wherein-the-provision-for-gratuity-amounting-to-rs-403887/20%Monthly2018-04-02 01:54
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-reasons-for-issue-of-notice-existed-at-the-time-of-issue-of-notice-and-the-reasons-are-genuine/20%Monthly2019-07-10 12:21
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-penalty-order-passed-by-the-assessing-officer-under-section-2711c/20%Monthly2019-07-11 12:03
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-where-assessing-officer-allowed-assessees-claim-for-deduction-under-section-80-ib-after-taking-into-consideration-all-material-facts-he-was-not-justified-in-initiating-reassessment-pro/20%Monthly2018-12-21 11:41
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-whether-the-tribunal-fell-into-an-error-in-upholding-the-deletion-of-a-sum-of-rs-15127450-directed-by-the-cita-on-account-of-long-term-capital-gain-assessed-by-the-ao-on-sale-of-s/20%Monthly2019-07-11 12:17
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-first-setting-off-carry-forward-speculative-losses-speculative-profit-set-off-business-losses/20%Monthly2018-04-05 09:44
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-first-setting-off-the-carry-forward-speculative-losses-against-the-speculative-profit-and-then-set-off-the-business-losses-to-the-extent-of-the-balance-speculation-profit-and-other-incom/20%Monthly2018-03-31 04:31
https://taxcaselaw.com/patna-h-c-the-complaint-petition-does-not-disclose-the-amount-of-evasion-of-tax-and-in-absence-of-statement-of-tax-and-in-absence-of-the-amount-evaded-the-proceeding-u-s-276cc/20%Monthly2019-07-16 10:23
https://taxcaselaw.com/rajasthan-h-c-whether-in-the-facts-and-circumstances-initiation-of-proceedings-under-sec-148-by-issuing-notice-to-only-one-of-the-lrs-of-deceased-mangi-lal-bhatia-without-issue-notices-to-other-lr/20%Monthly2019-07-15 06:34
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-circumstances-of-the-case-the-tribunal-was-right-in-cancelling-the-penalty-contrary-to-the-law-laid-down-in-306-itr-277-by-the-apex-court/20%Monthly2019-01-05 11:17
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-assumption-of-jurisdiction-by-issuance-of-notice-under-section-158-bc-was-invalid-and-void-ab-initio/20%Monthly2019-07-10 10:27
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-income-tax-appellate-tribunal-was-right-in-deleting-the-penalty-of-rs-2099393-levied-under-section-271d-of-the-income-tax-act-for-violation-of-section-269ss-on-the-ground-that-the/20%Monthly2019-07-11 08:03
https://taxcaselaw.com/madhya-pradesh-h-c-where-assessee-an-educational-society-applied-for-renewal-of-exemption-granted-under-section-80g-and-commissioner-on-failure-of-assessee-to-furnish-necessary-information-decline/20%Monthly2018-11-14 07:53
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-amounts-paid-by-the-company-towards-personal-expenses-of-the-assessee-cannot-be-taxed-in-its-hands-under-section-2-24iv-as-the-amount-was-routed-through-the-franchisee-which-was/20%Monthly2018-11-07 11:24
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-issued-by-the-first-respondent-on-7-september-2007-seeking-to-reopen-an-assessment-for-a-y-2005-06-under-section-148/20%Monthly2019-07-10 10:51
https://taxcaselaw.com/jharkhand-h-c-whether-survey-under-section-133a5-of-the-income-tax-act-will-also-bar-a-person-from-making-a-disclosure/20%Monthly2019-07-16 10:13
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-admission-made-during-the-survey-proceedings-cannot-be-the-basis-for-making-any-addition-of-amount/20%Monthly2018-03-29 12:38