XML Sitemap

This is a XML Sitemap which is supposed to be processed by search engines which follow the XML Sitemap standard like Ask.com, Bing, Google and Yahoo.
It was generated using the WordPress content management system and the Google Sitemap Generator Plugin by Arne Brachhold.
You can find more information about XML sitemaps on sitemaps.org and Google's list of sitemap programs.

URLPriorityChange frequencyLast modified (GMT)
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-addition-u-s-68-was-possible-even-where-the-income-of-the-appellant-was-exempt-under-section-10-22-of-the-act/20%Monthly2019-07-12 06:41
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-claim-of-exemption-under-section-10-23ciiiab/20%Monthly2019-07-12 05:59
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-and-haryana-h-c-the-approval-once-granted-under-section-80g5-of-the-income-tax-act-shall-continue-in-perpetuity-as-per-circular-no-5-of-2010/20%Monthly2018-11-26 09:50
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-whether-under-the-facts-and-circumstances-of-the-case-and-on-the-true-correct-interpretation-for-the-provisions-of-section-29-145-while-arriving-at-the-chargeable-i/20%Monthly2019-07-15 08:41
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-approval-once-granted-u-s-80-g5-of-i-t-act-shall-continue-in-perpetuity-as-per-circular-no-5-2010/20%Monthly2019-07-10 08:14
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-a-penalty-has-been-imposed-by-the-assessing-officer-under-section-2711-c/20%Monthly2019-07-12 07:32
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-itat-has-not-erred-in-law-in-case-of-the-respondent-for-deleting-the-addition-of-rs-2627610-for-ay-1998-1999-in-the-block-assessment-as-his-undisclosed-income-substantively-from-hi/20%Monthly2019-07-12 07:25
https://taxcaselaw.com/gauhati-h-c-the-exercise-of-power-by-way-of-the-impugned-order-is-ultravires-section-127a/20%Monthly2019-07-11 07:09
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-the-income-tax-appellate-tribunal-was-legally-right-in-not-quashing-the-penalty-proceedings-under-section-2732a-of-the-act-where-it-is-admitted-that-no-such-proceedings-were-propose/20%Monthly2019-01-05 11:58
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-when-an-amount-advanced-to-a-contractor-for-execution-of-work-for-the-purpose-of-business-becomes-irrecoverable-the-same-is-not-allowable-as-bad-debt/20%Monthly2019-01-08 08:29
https://taxcaselaw.com/rajasthan-h-c-the-learned-itat-was-justified-in-allowing-the-deductions-under-sec-80hhc-on-excess-stock-of-rs-939170-found-during-the-course-of-survey-and-surrendered-as-business-income-without/20%Monthly2019-07-15 11:45
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-whether-the-income-tax-appellate-tribunal-was-right-in-law-in-coming-to-the-conclusion-that-when-on-the-ground-on-which-the-reopening-of-assessment-is-based-no-additions-are-made-by-the/20%Monthly2018-12-21 11:37
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-whether-the-amount-of-rs-11570000-received-by-the-appellant-from-dtti-in-terms-of-release-agreement-with-dtti-is-capital-receipt-or-revenue-receipt/20%Monthly2019-07-12 10:18
https://taxcaselaw.com/rajasthan-h-c-the-judgment-in-ipca-laboratory-ltd-vs-cit-266-itr-521-sc-as-the-basic-facts-of-that-case-are-entirely-different-from-the-facts-of-the-present-case-inasmuch-as-in-that-case-there-w/20%Monthly2019-07-16 09:32
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-bank-accounts-of-the-petitioner-were-provisionally-attached-in-exercise-of-the-powers-conferred-under-section-281-b/20%Monthly2019-07-16 07:43
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-provisions-of-minimum-alternative-tax-under-the-provisions-of-section-115-jb-are-applicable-to-the-appellant-on-the-facts-and-circumstances-of-the-case/20%Monthly2019-07-16 06:24
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-deduction-under-section-80hhc-granted-to-the-assessee-even-though-the-amendment-made-by-the-finance-act-2-of-1991-introducing-schedule-xii-is-effective-from-the-assessment-year-1991/20%Monthly2019-07-11 12:24
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-whether-effective-date-for-amalgamation-being-date-as-envisaged-under-scheme-transferor-company-would-no-longer-be-amenable-to-assessment-proceedings-for-assessment-year-2010-11-and-imp/20%Monthly2018-11-21 12:03
https://taxcaselaw.com/rajasthan-h-c-where-demand-raised-in-post-search-assessment-was-duly-paid-seized-assets-were-to-be-returned/20%Monthly2018-11-14 09:34
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-honble-income-tax-appellate-tribunal-delhi-bench-new-delhi-has-erred-in-law-in-deleting-the-demand-of-rs-5580301-created-on-a-c-of-short-deduction-of-tax-from-the-pa/20%Monthly2019-07-12 08:13
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-the-tribunal-was-right-in-law-in-restricting-the-disallowance-to-the-extent-of-12-5-percent-of-the-addition-on-account-of-bogus-purchase-without-appreciating-the-factual-aspect-and-by-i/20%Monthly2019-07-12 08:00
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-difference-between-the-purchase-price-of-shares-and-the-market-value-of-shares-as-on-date-of-conversion-of-shares-from-stock-in-trade-to-investments-as-business-income-and-diff/20%Monthly2018-04-05 08:38
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-itat-was-right-in-law-in-not-sustaining-the-addition-of-rs-616945-on-account-of-corporate-membership-fee-paid-to-golf-club-as-a-capital-expenditure/20%Monthly2019-07-11 12:54
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-reasons-for-the-belief-that-income-has-escaped-assessment-incorrect-allowance-of-deduction-in-respect-of-royalty-received-from-foreign-enterprise/20%Monthly2019-07-12 11:53
https://taxcaselaw.com/rajasthan-h-c-in-view-of-finding-of-fact-recorded-by-revenue-authorities-that-no-services-were-rendered-by-sub-brokers-to-assessee-and-no-amount-was-paid-to-them-either-during-year-or-even-later-c/20%Monthly2018-11-22 10:39
https://taxcaselaw.com/rajasthan-h-c-where-assessee-failed-to-explain-source-of-agricultural-income-claimed-to-have-been-earned-by-it-no-exemption-could-be-allowed-in-respect-of-such-income/20%Monthly2018-11-22 10:32
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-since-in-the-set-aside-proceedings-the-jurisdiction-of-the-notice-pertaining-to-the-status-was-not-challenged-the-additional-ground-can-not-be-admitted-ignoring-that-the-jurisdiction/20%Monthly2019-07-11 07:28
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-it-proposed-to-file-a-writ-petition-before-this-court-challenging-the-legality-of-the-order-passed-under-section-127-but-in-order-to-comply-with-the-order-under-section-142-1-certain-d/20%Monthly2019-07-16 06:15
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-respondent-assessee-had-filed-a-return-declaring-an-income-of-rs-3990410-on-18-07-2006-subsequently-a-search-was-conducted-under-section-132/20%Monthly2019-07-12 12:09
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-tds-has-to-be-deducted-at-the-rate-prescribed-u-s-115a-of-the-act-after-recording-a-finding-that-payment-made-by-the-assessee-to-a-non-resident-company-is-not-towards-fee-for-technic/20%Monthly2018-11-22 10:23
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-petitioner-was-granted-a-registration-under-section-12a/20%Monthly2019-07-11 06:50
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-whether-the-tribunal-fell-into-error-in-setting-aside-the-order-of-penalty-imposed-by-the-ao-and-upheld-by-the-cit-a/20%Monthly2019-07-16 11:39
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-action-of-the-authorities-below-in-acting-on-its-own-presumptions-and-ignoring-the-law-laid-down-by-this-honble-court-in-cit-v-s-bicycle-wheels-india-is-legally-unsustai/20%Monthly2019-07-10 11:03
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-itat-was-justified-in-law-in-reversing-the-decision-of-cita-and-sustaining-the-addition-of-rs-17500000-made-solely-on-the-basis-of-statements-recorded-at-the-time-of-search-and-as/20%Monthly2019-07-12 08:06
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-the-itat-was-right-in-law-in-quashing-the-gift-tax-assessment-in-the-assessees-case/20%Monthly2019-05-29 07:09
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-whether-in-the-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-the-itat-was-right-in-law-in-holding-that-no-interest-under-section-16b-was-chargeable-in-this-case/20%Monthly2019-05-29 07:00
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-where-there-was-a-strong-prima-facie-case-against-assessee-that-she-conspired-alongwith-her-husband-and-other-accused-to-dupe-department-for-purpose-of-making-unlawful-gain-by-producing-b/20%Monthly2019-01-05 11:53
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-revised-return-was-invalid-in-law-when-the-said-return-was-filed-before-the-due-date-for-filing-the-return-u-s-139-4-of-the-act-and-it-could-be-deemed-as-a-rectified-return-u-s-13/20%Monthly2019-01-05 11:48
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-and-haryana-h-c-the-amount-of-grant-in-aid-was-capital-receipt-or-a-revenue-receipt-was-a-debatable-issue-penalty-under-section-2711c-could-not-be-imposed/20%Monthly2018-11-22 10:05
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-they-were-issued-ext-p4-notice-dated-11-9-96-under-section-1432-of-the-act-requiring-them-to-attend-the-office-of-the-assessing-officer-to-clarify-the-points-mentioned-therein/20%Monthly2019-07-12 12:19
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-payment-was-totally-unwarranted-and-the-assessee-did-not-derive-any-benefit-out-of-the-same-and-that-therefore-the-notices-issued-under-section-148/20%Monthly2019-07-12 11:06
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-assessees-claim-for-deduction-of-rs-10866420-and-rs-49341-being-reserves-for-export-market-development-allowance-and-bad-doubtful-debt-is-allowable-under-the-income-tax-a/20%Monthly2019-07-11 07:37
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-forfeiture-of-earnest-money-arising-out-of-agreement-to-sale-a-property-is-not-liable-to-tax/20%Monthly2019-05-18 12:03
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-purported-reasons-for-issuing-the-notice-under-section-148-and-for-reopening-the-assessments-under-section-147/20%Monthly2019-07-12 12:27
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-explanation-offered-by-the-assessee-was-satisfactory-or-not-in-the-wake-of-the-provisions-of-section-69-of-the-income-tax-act-196/20%Monthly2019-06-04 11:59
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-the-tribunal-was-right-in-law-in-restricting-the-disallowance-to-the-extent-of-12-5-per-cent-of-the-bogus-purchase-without-appreciating-the-factual-aspect-and-by-ignoring-the-manifest/20%Monthly2019-01-05 11:46
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-the-appellate-tribunal-is-justified-in-confirming-the-addition-of-rs-16-lakhs-as-net-long-term-capital-gains-without-allowing-any-deduction-for-cost-and-indexed-cost-of-acquisition-in-r/20%Monthly2018-11-22 10:52
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-whether-the-sale-proceeds-of-the-land-at-ayyanthole-were-within-the-scope-of-section-54b-of-the-income-tax-act/20%Monthly2019-07-12 08:26
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-most-of-the-items-purchased-by-the-appellant-were-new-identifiable-assets-brought-into-existence-and-could-not-be-termed-as-current-repairs/20%Monthly2019-07-10 07:38
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-there-was-no-cessation-of-liabilities-u-s-411-of-the-i-t-act-even-though-the-ao-had-duly-brought-out-the-falsehood-of-the-claim-of-purported-liability-may-be-subsequently-shown-as-purp/20%Monthly2018-11-22 10:42
https://taxcaselaw.com/rajasthan-h-c-lease-rentals-were-allowable-as-business-expenditure-in-the-case-of-assessee/20%Monthly2019-07-10 09:34
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-penalty-under-section-2711c-could-not-be-imposed-merely-because-books-of-account-maintained-by-assessee-were-rejected-and-its-profit-was-estimated-on-basis-of-fair-gross-profit-ratio/20%Monthly2019-05-18 12:46
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-the-claim-of-the-assessee-for-depreciation-under-section-32-of-the-income-tax-act-1961/20%Monthly2019-06-04 12:53
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-where-material-was-available-before-settlement-commission-which-was-considered-for-determining-undisclosed-income-on-basis-of-gross-profit-rate-such-addition-was-just/20%Monthly2018-10-26 07:47
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-interest-from-fixed-deposit-made-by-the-assessee-in-four-banks-who-are-members-in-the-assessee-club-amounted-to-its-income-and-constituted-a-revenue-receipt/20%Monthly2019-06-05 05:56
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-and-on-a-proper-interpretation-of-section-54f-of-the-income-tax-act-1961-the-tribunal-was-right-in-law-in-allowing-the-deduction/20%Monthly2019-07-12 12:33
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-to-declare-the-authorization-of-income-tax-search-u-s-132/20%Monthly2019-06-04 11:50
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-petitioner-has-sought-to-question-the-legality-of-a-notice-dated-24-march-2011-issued-by-the-assessing-officer-under-section-148/20%Monthly2019-05-29 06:49
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-assessees-income-from-business-is-not-liable-to-tax-in-india-in-the-absence-of-pe-in-india-and-thus-once-the-business-income-is-not-assessable-as-per-the-act-the-loss-arising-from-the/20%Monthly2019-07-16 12:46
https://taxcaselaw.com/rajasthan-h-c-where-audit-report-was-filed-during-course-of-assessment-proceedings-deduction-under-section-80hhc-could-not-be-denied-on-mere-ground-that-such-audit-report-was-not-filed-along-with-r/20%Monthly2018-10-24 12:35
https://taxcaselaw.com/rajasthan-h-c-the-penalty-was-not-imposed-within-the-prescribed-period-under-section-275ic-from-the-date-of-initiation-by-the-ao-ignoring-the-legal-provision-that-the-authority-competent-to-impo/20%Monthly2019-07-16 09:38
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-whether-the-honble-itat-was-right-in-law-in-confirming-the-relief-allowed-by-the-learned-cit-a-in-respect-of-the-addition-of-rs-20947604-being-capital-gain-on-th/20%Monthly2019-07-15 08:18
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-sum-of-rs-9-80-crores-which-accrued-towards-interest-on-fixed-deposits-made-by-the-assessee-to-secure-the-bank-guarantee-amount-furnished-to-the-state-of-bihar-bear-the-character-o/20%Monthly2019-07-11 07:19
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-notice-can-be-saved-is-if-the-factual-position-falls-within-the-parameters-specified-under-the-proviso-to-section-147/20%Monthly2019-05-29 07:36
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-tribunal-was-justified-in-setting-aside-the-disallowance-of-rs-39372038-made-by-the-ao-under-section-40aiii-of-the-act-when-the-assessee-failed-to-deduct-tax-at-source-on-such/20%Monthly2019-07-11 06:58
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-production-before-the-ao-of-account-books-or-other-evidence-from-which-material-evidence-could-with-the-diligence-have-been-discovered-by-the-ao-will-not-necessarily-amount-to-disclosure/20%Monthly2019-05-29 06:37
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-if-a-revision-has-not-been-decided-by-commissioner-with-in-stipulated-period-it-does-not-mean-that-revision-stands-allowed/20%Monthly2018-03-31 04:32
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-the-legislative-intent-is-that-the-revision-should-be-decided-expeditiously-if-possible-within-the-time-bound-period-failure-to-do-so-would-not-defeat-the-right-of-the-aggrieved-perso/20%Monthly2018-03-31 04:27
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-the-petitioner-filed-an-appeal-with-an-application-to-condone-delay-of-2-years-10-months-and-8-days/20%Monthly2019-07-12 12:39
https://taxcaselaw.com/rajasthan-h-c-the-learned-tribunal-was-justified-in-allowing-the-relief-of-rs-854010-out-of-trading-addition-of-rs-866728-made-by-ao-by-relying-on-the-decision-of-howrah-trading-co-p-ltd/20%Monthly2018-11-22 10:47
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-where-assessee-engaged-in-purchase-and-sale-of-shares-maintained-two-separate-portfolios-i-e-an-investment-portfolio-and-a-trading-portfolio-income-arising-from-sale-of-shares-out-of-in/20%Monthly2018-04-11 12:36
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-assessee-who-was-aggrieved-by-the-orders-passed-by-the-assessing-officer-as-well-as-the-commissioner-of-income-tax-appeals-had-inter-alia-taken-the-ground-that-the-addition-of-rs/20%Monthly2019-06-06 09:55
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-the-officer-had-reasons-to-believe-that-the-appellants-income-chargeable-to-tax-for-the-assessment-year-2006-2007-had-escaped-assessment-within-the-meaning-of-section-147/20%Monthly2019-06-05 06:38
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-the-tribunal-is-legally-justified-in-sustaining-the-penalty-u-s-2711c/20%Monthly2019-05-15 08:16
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-the-amount-set-aside-by-the-assessee-to-provide-for-meeting-liabilities-other-than-ascertained-liabilities-was-not-required-to-be-added-back-while-computing-the-book-profit-u-s-115jb-of/20%Monthly2019-07-10 12:37
https://taxcaselaw.com/gauhati-h-c-transferring-the-assessment-cases-of-the-petitioners-from-guwahati-to-delhi-for-proper-coordinated-and-effective-investigation-as-to-their-involvement-on-the-issue-of-receipt-of-bogus/20%Monthly2019-07-11 12:13
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-sale-of-blood-amounts-to-medical-relief-within-the-purview-of-section-215-of-the-i-t-act-1961/20%Monthly2019-07-10 11:25
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-the-itat-is-correct-in-law-in-upholding-the-cita-order-of-deleting-the-addition-of-rs-1726124-u-s-14a-of-the-i-t-act-196/20%Monthly2019-07-10 11:17
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-order-passed-under-section-2011-and-under-section-2011a-of-the-act-is-not-liable-in-respect-of-payments-made-by-the-assessee-towards-liaison-services-provided-as-the-same-would/20%Monthly2019-07-16 10:47
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-respondent-can-be-considered-to-be-a-tax-resident-of-germany/20%Monthly2019-07-12 10:11
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-tribunal-was-justified-in-allowing-the-assessees-claim-of-deduction-u-s-80hhe-on-the-ground-that-the-assessee-had-exported-customized-electronic-data/20%Monthly2019-07-12 10:04
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-issue-for-consideration-is-the-petitioners-claim-on-the-expenditure-incurred-for-replacement-of-machinery-in-the-spinning-mills-as-revenue-expenditure-was-disallowed-by-the-assessin/20%Monthly2019-07-10 10:05
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-assessee-has-proved-the-nature-and-source-of-the-share-subscription-amounting-to-rs-14700000-and-has-established-the-identity-and-creditworthiness-of-the-share-subscribers-and-the/20%Monthly2019-06-06 10:42
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-the-respondent-assessee-is-a-trust-who-was-treated-as-an-aop-by-the-assessing-officer-for-the-assessment-year-2002-2003-by-an-order-dated-24th-may-2005-and-exemption-under-sections-11-12-of/20%Monthly2019-06-06 10:13
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-a-sum-of-rs-8004000-claimed-as-a-foreign-exchange-lose-on-account-of-restatement-of-cdc-loan-should-be-treated-as-a-revenue-loss-despite-the-same-not-having-actually-arisen-and-was/20%Monthly2019-07-12 07:54
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-reopening-of-the-concluded-assessment-for-the-assessment-year-2006-07-by-issue-of-notice-under-section-148/20%Monthly2019-07-16 06:28
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-correctness-of-the-seizure-effected-by-the-authorities-of-the-respondent-department-is-vindicated-by-the-fact-that-even-under-the-proceedings-initiated-under-section-132b/20%Monthly2019-07-11 12:35
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-assessing-officer-has-wrongly-assumed-jurisdiction-under-the-provision-of-section-158bd/20%Monthly2019-06-08 06:17
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-the-sum-of-rs-3239929-being-provision-made-for-retirement-gratuity-written-back-in-the-year-under-consideration-relating-to-assessment-year-1972-73-where-it-already-stood-allowed/20%Monthly2019-07-16 10:41
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-where-assessee-proved-sale-transaction-of-shares-by-filing-mass-documentary-evidence-and-payment-of-sale-price-was-made-through-bank-channel-sale-transaction-could-not-be-disbelieved/20%Monthly2019-05-18 12:01
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-the-petitioner-did-not-produce-any-proof-that-he-had-no-other-business-or-source-of-income/20%Monthly2019-06-08 06:57
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-jurisdiction-of-high-court-is-determined-by-situs-of-assessing-officer-at-time-of-filing-appeal/20%Monthly2019-01-05 12:20
https://taxcaselaw.com/jharkhand-h-c-dividend-rs-5-05-lac-capital-gains-rs-10-75-lacs-and-provision-of-excise-duty-written-back-rs-95-25-lacs-should-be-held-as-profit-from-business-for-the-purpose-of-deduction-un/20%Monthly2019-07-10 10:41
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-the-petitioners-are-not-persons-as-contemplated-in-section-1421/20%Monthly2019-07-11 06:33
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-they-are-directed-against-reassessment-proceedings-initiated-by-issue-of-notices-under-section-148/20%Monthly2019-06-08 06:29
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-the-first-respondent-rejecting-his-application-made-under-section-2202a-for-waiver-of-interest-levied-under-section-220-2-of-the-income-tax-act/20%Monthly2019-06-05 07:06