XML Sitemap

This is a XML Sitemap which is supposed to be processed by search engines which follow the XML Sitemap standard like Ask.com, Bing, Google and Yahoo.
It was generated using the WordPress content management system and the Google Sitemap Generator Plugin by Arne Brachhold.
You can find more information about XML sitemaps on sitemaps.org and Google's list of sitemap programs.

URLPriorityChange frequencyLast modified (GMT)
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-tribunal-was-right-in-law-in-deleting-the-settlement-charges-and-legal-expenses-by-the-assessee-for-getting-a-consent-decree-from-the-high-court/20%Monthly2018-10-04 11:08
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-know-how-business-contacts-business-information-etc-acquired-as-part-of-the-slump-sale-described-as-goodwill-were-not-entitled-for-depreciation-under-section-321ii/20%Monthly2019-07-18 10:31
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-where-details-of-commission-paid-to-company-in-question-were-furnished-to-assessing-officer-and-entire-expenditure-was-disallowed-under-section-40a2b-in-order-of-assessment-under-sec/20%Monthly2018-10-26 10:13
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-where-government-waived-off-loan-granted-towards-cost-of-assets-assessees-case-fell-under-section-431-and-thus-depreciation-on-assets-was-to-be-disallowed-to-extent-of-loan-so-waived/20%Monthly2019-01-01 12:02
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-there-is-no-requirement-in-section-153c1-that-assessing-officer-should-also-be-satisfied-that-such-valuable-articles-or-books-of-account-or-documents-belonging-to-other-person-must-concl/20%Monthly2018-10-04 11:06
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-allows-the-departmental-appeal-and-rejects-the-appellants-cross-objections-against-the-order-of-the-cita-was-perverse-contrary-to-facts-and-against-evidences-in-respect-of-the-ass/20%Monthly2018-10-04 10:35
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-assessee-firm-was-eligible-for-claiming-deduction-under-section-80ib10-of-the-act-wherein-the-assessee-failed-to-fulfill-the-primary-conditions-laid-down-under-section-80ib10-of-t/20%Monthly2018-10-26 09:54
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-where-book-profits-as-declared-were-in-conformity-and-as-per-provisions-of-parts-ii-and-iii-of-schedule-vi-of-companies-act-1956-adjustment-of-prior-period-expenses-in-book-profits-under/20%Monthly2019-01-02 05:49
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-applications-for-stay-of-demand-by-the-first-of-those-orders-the-petitioners-are-directed-to-pay-50-of-the-total-demand-of-rs-1-56-crores-of-which-an-amount-of-rs-35-lacs-was-to-be-pai/20%Monthly2019-06-07 06:52
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-where-revenue-is-adequately-protected-by-provisional-attachment-levied-under-section-281b-there-is-no-justification-in-directing-assessee-to-deposit-entire-demand-of-tax-within-seven-day/20%Monthly2018-04-05 08:43
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-and-haryana-h-c-clubbing-of-the-income-of-the-minor-child-earned-in-his-her-own-right-or-not-in-the-income-of-the-parents-is-against-the-provisions-of-article-14-of-the-constitution-of-ind/20%Monthly2018-09-20 17:46
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-itat-is-justified-to-hold-the-assessees-claim-of-deduction-as-bad-debt-of-rs-4428000-being-allowable-as-business-loss-instead-of-holding-by-assessing-officer-as-capital-lo/20%Monthly2019-07-17 12:06
https://taxcaselaw.com/aar-the-capital-gain-tax-on-sale-of-shares-is-to-be-paid-in-the-netherlands-only-and-that-the-tds-already-made-on-the-sale-of-shares-is-to-be-refunded-to-her-by-india/20%Monthly2018-10-13 06:14
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-case-of-the-assessee-is-covered-by-principles-of-mutuality-and-hence-tdr-premium-received-by-the-society-is-not-taxable-without-appreciating-that-the-tdr-premium-payment-is-made-by/20%Monthly2018-10-13 06:05
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-benefit-under-section-10a-is-attached-to-undertaking-and-not-to-owner-thereof-and-therefore-conversion-of-proprietorship-into-partnership-would-not-disentitle-assessee-to-claim-benef/20%Monthly2018-10-13 06:02
https://taxcaselaw.com/aar-whether-in-terms-of-the-contract-dated-10-2-2009-hereinafter-referreed-to-as-the-contract-between-x-hereinafter-referred-to-as-x-and-consortium-of-abc-germany-and-e-hereinafter-referr/20%Monthly2019-07-17 12:23
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-holding-of-classes-is-not-mandatory-for-an-institution-to-qualify-and-to-be-treated-as-an-educational-institution-under-section-1023cvi/20%Monthly2018-04-11 12:31
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-sum-of-rs-24-17-crores-for-the-assessment-year-1990-91-and-a-sum-of-rs-28-86-crores-for-the-assessment-year-1991-92-constituted-a-diversion-by-overriding-charge/20%Monthly2019-06-13 09:59
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-assessee-company-which-was-working-as-an-agent-of-shipping-company-registered-in-uae-was-not-liable-to-tax-in-india-as-per-article-8-of-double-taxation-avoidance-agreement-between-indi/20%Monthly2019-01-07 11:43
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-petitioner-asked-for-furnishing-of-reasons-to-believe-recorded-in-writing-before-issue-of-notice-under-section-148/20%Monthly2019-06-11 08:17
https://taxcaselaw.com/aar-contract-between-ongc-petro-additions-limited-and-consortium-of-linde-ag-germany-and-samsung-engineering-company-ltd-korea-hereinafter-referred-to-as-sec-the-applicant-and-sec-are-taxa/20%Monthly2018-10-13 05:57
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-sale-proceeds-earned-by-the-assessee-out-of-sale-of-shares-held-in-private-limited-companies-cannot-be-treated-as-the-income-of-the-assessee-and-brought-to-capital-gains-tax/20%Monthly2019-07-15 11:58
https://taxcaselaw.com/aar-inspection-verification-testing-and-certification-ivtc-services-are-taxable-as-fts-under-section-91vii-but-not-under-provisions-of-article-on-royalties-and-fees-for-technical-services/20%Monthly2019-01-07 11:39
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-where-net-tax-effect-is-less-than-rs-4-lakhs-no-appeal-is-maintainable-before-this-court/20%Monthly2019-07-10 08:03
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-assessing-officer-had-allowed-interest-expenditure-from-dividend-income-under-section-57-on-basis-of-disclosures-made-by-assessee-he-could-not-reopen-assessment-on-ground-that-in-origin/20%Monthly2018-10-04 10:31
https://taxcaselaw.com/rajasthan-h-c-no-penalty-was-leviable-under-section-158bfa-where-alleged-undisclosed-income-was-computed-on-basis-of-estimation/20%Monthly2018-10-04 10:23
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-excise-duty-refund-received-by-the-respondent-assessee-was-not-assessable-under-section-411/20%Monthly2018-09-20 12:55
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-where-a-dutch-company-rendered-technical-services-to-assessee-without-making-available-any-technical-expertise-so-as-to-enable-assessee-to-use-those-services-independently-in-future/20%Monthly2018-10-12 12:02
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-petitioner-filed-a-rectification-application-under-section-154/20%Monthly2019-07-18 11:39
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-article-226-of-the-constitution-is-to-a-notice-of-demand-dated-29-february-2012-issued-by-the-income-tax-officer-1932-calling-upon-the-petitioner-to-pay-an-amount-of-rs-9-63-crores-un/20%Monthly2019-07-19 10:50
https://taxcaselaw.com/aar-where-seconded-employees-continued-to-be-employees-of-overseas-entities-and-they-rendered-services-for-their-employer-in-india-by-working-for-a-specified-period-for-a-subsidiary-or-associate-ent/20%Monthly2019-01-07 11:37
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-assessing-officer-has-sought-to-reopen-an-assessment-for-ay-2004-05-by-a-notice-dated-10-february-2011-issued-under-section-148/20%Monthly2019-06-13 07:25
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-where-assessing-officer-had-disallowed-assessees-claim-for-depreciation-penalty-under-section-2711c-not-leviable/20%Monthly2018-10-13 05:40
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-assessing-officer-has-sought-to-reopen-an-assessment-under-section-148-of-the-income-tax-act/20%Monthly2019-06-13 07:29
https://taxcaselaw.com/aar-the-payments-received-receivable-by-the-applicant-in-connection-with-transactions-undertaken-proposed-to-be-undertaken-in-relation-to-the-following-services-are-chargeable-to-tax-in-india-as-f/20%Monthly2019-01-03 12:51
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-where-nature-of-levy-of-licence-fee-was-not-merely-compulsory-exaction-of-money-to-augment-revenue-of-state-but-its-true-object-was-to-regulate-control-manage-and-encourage-sport-of-h/20%Monthly2018-10-10 13:04
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-admission-of-the-new-partners-and-assignment-of-right-in-the-firm-to-the-new-partners-out-of-the-rights-of-the-assessee-for-consideration-does-not-amount-to-transfer-in-the-hands-o/20%Monthly2018-09-20 19:05
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-these-are-applications-for-condonation-of-delay-in-filing-and-re-filing-of-the-appeal/20%Monthly2019-07-17 12:42
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-when-section-1512-mandates-satisfaction-of-joint-commissioner-for-issuance-of-notice-under-section-148-in-certain-cases-reopening-of-assessment-with-approval-of-commissioner-is-unsusta/20%Monthly2018-10-04 12:08
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-where-division-bench-of-gujarat-high-court-dealing-with-an-issue-arising-under-section-127-had-not-followed-law-laid-down-by-supreme-court-in-case-of-ajantha-industries-v-cbdt-1976-10/20%Monthly2018-12-21 11:29
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-provident-fund-and-esi-contributions-made-after-due-dates-but-before-filing-of-return-are-allowable/20%Monthly2018-10-23 09:31
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-reopen-the-assessment-under-section-147-of-the-act-by-issuing-a-notice-under-section-148-of-the-act-notwithstanding-the-fact-that-there-is-no-valid-reason-to-issue-such-notice/20%Monthly2019-06-12 10:01
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-three-additions-disallowances-by-way-of-provident-fund-employees-state-insurance-payment-disallowance-under-section-40aia-and-the-depreciation-on-vehicles/20%Monthly2019-07-16 08:34
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-the-applicant-is-not-entitled-to-relief-u-s-80-i/20%Monthly2019-06-13 07:39
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-donations-to-the-tune-of-rs-75-lakhs-made-by-the-assessee-to-the-all-india-anna-dravida-munnetra-kazhagam-could-not-be-included-in-the-undisclosed-income-of-the-block-period-ignoring-rele/20%Monthly2019-05-29 06:05
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-if-reasons-recorded-for-issue-of-notice-under-section-148-are-factually-incorrect-that-cannot-therefore-form-the-basis-for-the-belief/20%Monthly2018-03-29 10:21
https://taxcaselaw.com/gauhati-h-c-when-sub-section-2a-of-section-260a-by-which-high-court-was-equipped-with-power-to-consider-an-application-for-condonation-of-delay-was-inserted-in-statute-book-with-effect-from-1-10/20%Monthly2018-10-04 12:05
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-assessee-having-followed-a-reasonable-basis-of-valuation-of-closing-stock-which-had-been-regularly-followed-and-accepted-by-department-in-earlier-years-and-in-subsequent-year-and-gp-rate/20%Monthly2018-10-24 10:21
https://taxcaselaw.com/rajasthan-h-c-advance-received-for-supply-of-goods-which-was-mistakenly-credited-in-capital-account-of-assessee-was-not-chargeable-to-tax-as-revenue-receipt/20%Monthly2018-10-04 12:03
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-assessing-officer-to-allow-deduction-of-interest-payment-on-funds-introduced-in-the-firm-in-the-form-of-loan-against-remuneration-received-from-the-firm/20%Monthly2019-06-06 11:19
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-whether-the-income-tax-appellate-tribunal-was-justified-and-right-in-allowing-the-appeal-filed-by-the-respondent-assessee-and-deleting-the-penalty-under-section-271d-of-the-income-tax-act/20%Monthly2019-07-19 11:23
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-order-of-reassessment-passed-without-disposing-of-objections-of-assessee-would-be-invalid/20%Monthly2018-10-04 12:50
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-the-tribunal-have-erred-in-law-in-not-taking-into-consideration-the-provisions-of-section-292bb-of-the-act-while-allowing-the-assessee-to-raise-the-additional-ground-of-appeal-and-in-d/20%Monthly2018-10-04 11:59
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-the-tribunal-was-justified-in-holding-the-single-notice-issued-under-section-148-for-four-assessment-years-as-valid/20%Monthly2018-10-04 11:53