XML Sitemap

This is a XML Sitemap which is supposed to be processed by search engines which follow the XML Sitemap standard like Ask.com, Bing, Google and Yahoo.
It was generated using the WordPress content management system and the Google Sitemap Generator Plugin by Arne Brachhold.
You can find more information about XML sitemaps on sitemaps.org and Google's list of sitemap programs.

URLPriorityChange frequencyLast modified (GMT)
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-high-court-under-section-260a-against-decision-of-tribunal-high-court-while-overruling-decision-of-tribunal-should-give-its-findings-in-detail-particularly-on-question-whether-there-was-any/20%Monthly2018-10-04 13:06
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-income-derived-by-the-assessee-from-manufacturing-of-seeds-and-sale-of-the-same-would-amount-to-agricultural-income-which-would-be-exempt-under-section-101/20%Monthly2018-07-20 13:16
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-amounts-paid-to-clubs-for-obtaining-membership-should-be-treated-as-a-revenue-expenditure-and-was-allowable-deduction-and-not-a-capital-receipt-as-held-by-the-assessing-officer/20%Monthly2018-10-24 10:49
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-writ-petition-challenging-order-passed-pursuant-direction-issued-drp-not-allowed-assessee-directed-file-appeal-tribunal-redressal-grievances/20%Monthly2018-04-05 09:38
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-whether-in-view-of-the-provisions-of-section-80-ia9-applicable-to-section-80-ib-of-the-income-tax-act-1961-the-restriction-imposed-by-section-80-ia9-is-applicable-at-the-stage-o/20%Monthly2018-07-17 08:10
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-amounts-paid-by-the-appellants-to-the-foreign-software-suppliers-was-not-royalty-and-that-the-same-did-not-give-rise-to-any-income-taxable-in-india-and-therefore-the/20%Monthly2018-10-12 08:24
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-transaction-charges-paid-by-the-assessee-to-the-stock-exchanges-were-not-fees-for-technical-services-and-therefore-the-provisions-of-section-194j-were-not-attracted-and-consequently/20%Monthly2018-07-13 07:53
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-disallowance-on-the-depreciation-claimed-by-the-assessee/20%Monthly2018-12-15 07:40
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-claim-for-deduction-was-rejected-by-assessing-officer-on-ground-that-since-in-normal-computation-there-was-no-profit-after-carry-forward-loss-of-earlier-years-deduction-under-section-80hhe-for/20%Monthly2018-12-17 05:37
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-where-transaction-of-financial-restructuring-with-lenders-and-resultant-waiver-of-interest-were-disclosed-in-return-of-income-reopening-of-assessment-was-not-sustainable/20%Monthly2018-10-12 06:46
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-the-assessees-claim-for-being-assessed-as-per-second-proviso-to-section-112-1-could-not-have-been-considered-and-allowed-from-the-stage-of-the-first-appellate-authority/20%Monthly2018-10-04 13:04
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-explain-why-penalty-proceedings-under-s-271ba/20%Monthly2019-07-12 11:45
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-amounts-by-way-of-donations-directly-towards-funds-known-as-rural-project-fund-is-corpus-fund/20%Monthly2018-04-05 10:10
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-payment-made-by-assessee-to-a-non-resident-in-order-to-obtain-licence-to-use-database-maintained-by-it-is-to-be-regarded-as-royalty/20%Monthly2018-12-21 11:04
https://taxcaselaw.com/rajasthan-h-c-co-ordinated-investigation-is-valid-ground-for-transfer-of-case-under-section-127-from-one-assessing-officer-to-another/20%Monthly2018-12-21 11:08
https://taxcaselaw.com/uttarakhand-h-c-the-assessee-did-not-have-permanent-establishment-in-india-within-the-meaning-of-article-5-of-the-dtaa-between-india-and-the-netherlands/20%Monthly2018-10-10 10:08
https://taxcaselaw.com/uttarakhand-h-c-penalty-proceedings-under-section-271b-are-also-initiated-as-the-assessees-business-turnover-exceeds-rs-40-lakhs-and-accounts-are-not-audited-as-per-section-44ab-issue-deman/20%Monthly2019-07-10 10:15
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-whether-the-tribunal-was-right-in-law-of-depreciation-disallowed-and-on-account-of-late-payment-of-provident-fund/20%Monthly2018-07-14 07:51
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-assessee-is-entitled-to-the-benefit-of-the-extended-period-of-ten-consecutive-years-under-s-10b-of-the-act-though-prior-to-coming-into-force-of-the-amended-provision-he-had-the-b/20%Monthly2019-07-10 10:34
https://taxcaselaw.com/aar-british-company-is-engaged-in-business-of-providing-and-enabling-electronic-payment-services-via-mobile-and-fixed-line-telecom-and-other-telecom-service-networks/20%Monthly2019-01-08 07:04
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-while-computing-the-capital-gains-arising-on-transfer-of-a-capital-asset-acquired-by-the-assessee-under-a-gift-whether-the-indexed-cost-of-acquisition-has-to-be-computed-with-reference-t/20%Monthly2018-12-21 11:19
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-whether-transactions-of-nature-of-general-power-of-attorney-sales-gpa-sales-or-sale-agreement-general-power-of-attorney-will-transfers-sa-gpa-will-transfers-do-not-convey-title-and-d/20%Monthly2018-12-17 06:02
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-stage-for-application-o/20%Monthly2018-12-21 10:20
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-allowing-the-itat-was-justified-in-allowing-the-benefit-of-exemption-under-section-44-of-the-income-tax-act-by-wrongly-interpreting-section-54-of-the-i-t-act-in-which-the-due-d/20%Monthly2018-12-28 05:57