XML Sitemap

This is a XML Sitemap which is supposed to be processed by search engines which follow the XML Sitemap standard like Ask.com, Bing, Google and Yahoo.
It was generated using the WordPress content management system and the Google Sitemap Generator Plugin by Arne Brachhold.
You can find more information about XML sitemaps on sitemaps.org and Google's list of sitemap programs.

URLPriorityChange frequencyLast modified (GMT)
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-reopening-of-assessment-justified-if-assessee-did-not-disclose-all-facts-during-assessment-proceeding/20%Monthly2018-07-13 07:20
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-whether-before-ordering-special-audit-under-section-1422a-satisfaction-of-complexity-of-accounts-is-required-to-be-arrived-at-by-discussing-accounts-in-meticulous-details/20%Monthly2018-11-07 11:47
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-issue-debabtable-penalty-imposed-section-2711c-can-not-sustain-law/20%Monthly2018-07-07 08:36
https://taxcaselaw.com/andhra-pradesh-h-c-whether-assessee-had-not-purchased-shares-as-an-investment-but-with-intention-to-trade-in-such-scrips/20%Monthly2018-07-13 07:11
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-assessee-pays-tax-subsequent-to-the-1st-day-of-april-of-an-assessment-year-but-before-or-along-with-the-date-of-return-if-that-tax-is-ordered-to-be-refunded-what-is-the-date-fro/20%Monthly2019-01-08 06:25
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-income-detected-pursuant-to-search-cannot-be-brought-to-tax-in-the-block-assessment-despite-the-same-having-not-been-disclosed-within-the-stipulated-time-prescribed-under-section-1/20%Monthly2019-01-08 06:27
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-whether-conditions-stipulated-for-compounding-of-a-technical-offence-being-very-clear-and-unambiguous-compounding-of-such-an-offence-is-not-permissible-after-filing-of-complaint/20%Monthly2018-04-16 03:36
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-where-assessee-was-allotted-a-car-as-first-prize-under-national-saving-scheme-such-prize-could-not-be-treated-as-lotteries-under-section-224ix/20%Monthly2018-11-07 12:43
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-the-assessee-and-his-family-members-have-received-the-gifts-of-idbs-ignoring-the-evidence-on-record/20%Monthly2019-01-08 06:04
https://taxcaselaw.com/aar-applicant-is-a-korean-company-engaged-in-business-of-manufacturing-electric-wire-and-cable-for-power-distribution-it-entered-into-three-separate-contracts-with-an-indian-company-namely-dtl-f/20%Monthly2018-04-16 03:34
https://taxcaselaw.com/aar-the-applicant-to-lscl-under-the-transaction-mentioned-in-annexure-iii-in-respect-of-offshore-supply-of-equipments-is-liable-to-tax/20%Monthly2018-04-16 03:35
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-repairs-and-renovation-expenses-incurred-on-the-leased-business-premises-as-capital-expenditure/20%Monthly2019-05-28 08:18
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-interest-under-section-234b-could-not-be-levied-by-the-order-under-section-154-on-the-ground-that-the-words-used-in-section-2091d-is-tax-deductible-at-source-without-appreciating/20%Monthly2018-11-14 07:00
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-all-applicants-had-given-confirmation-of-advancing-money-and-assessee-had-proved-identity-and-creditworthiness-of-applicants/20%Monthly2018-07-20 11:56
https://taxcaselaw.com/aar-the-applicant-under-the-seismic-data-acquisition-and-processing-contract-with-bhp-billiton-in-india-are-taxable-in-accordance-with-section-44bb/20%Monthly2019-01-08 06:06
https://taxcaselaw.com/aar-the-applicant-was-not-liable-to-be-taxed-as-royalty-in-terms-of-section-91viiva-given-the-exclusion-carved-out-in-respect-of-such-income-falling-within-the-purview-of-section-44bb-of/20%Monthly2019-01-09 05:43
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-the-intimation-issued-under-section-1431a-is-bad-in-law-without-appreciating-that-intimation-under-section-1431a-was-issued-in-respect-of-the-revised-return-whereas-the-notice/20%Monthly2018-10-11 10:21
https://taxcaselaw.com/uttarakhand-h-c-whether-further-alleged-bias-against-one-member-of-panel-does-not-make-provision-ultra-vires-and-therefore-provision-of-section-144c-and-rule-32-could-not-be-held-to-be-ultra-vi/20%Monthly2018-07-20 11:51
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-assessing-officer-accepting-the-method-of-accounting-followed-by-the-assessee-which-results-in-postponement-of-its-tax-liability-as-per-the-discretion-of-the-assessee-since/20%Monthly2018-07-17 05:40
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-assessee-understated-income-claimed-excessive-loss-deduction-allowance-relief-return/20%Monthly2018-07-11 08:00
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-provision-bad-doubtful-debts-not-added-back-purpose-computation-section-115jb/20%Monthly2018-07-07 08:26
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-present-case-the-reasons-recorded-for-reopening-of-the-assessment-though-repeatedly-asked-by-the-assessee-were-furnished-only-after-completion-of-the-assessment/20%Monthly2018-07-23 13:06
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-profit-loss-account-not-prepared-accordance-provisions-companies-act-1956/20%Monthly2018-07-09 06:52
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-honble-income-tax-appellate-tribunal-was-justified-in-holding-the-recording-of-satisfaction-u-s-158bd-by-the-assessing-officer-of-the-person-searched-and-consequent-issuan/20%Monthly2019-01-08 06:22
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-intimation-under-section-1431a-in-an-order-the-tribunal-erred-in-holding-that-the-provisions-of-section-234b-are-applicable/20%Monthly2018-07-16 12:26
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-there-is-no-goodwill-attributable-as-the-manufacture-of-cement-in-the-newly-acquired-company-would-involve-problems/20%Monthly2018-05-22 11:40
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-tribunal-was-justified-in-law-in-allowing-depreciation-on-the-assets-for-which-the-assessing-officer-had-treated-the-transaction-as-that-of-finance-and-not-of-leasing/20%Monthly2019-01-08 06:21
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-sum-of-rs-75-lakhs-received-by-the-assessee-from-m-s-praxair-carbon-dioxide-pvt-ltd-towards-transfer-of-certain-rights-and-not-carrying-on-similar-business-was-not-liable-to-t/20%Monthly2018-10-11 09:51
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-where-assessee-had-deducted-tds-from-payments-to-contractors-and-such-amount-was-deposited-with-revenue-before-last-date-of-filing-of-return-it-was-entitled-to-deduction-of-such-payment/20%Monthly2019-05-15 08:14
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-rectification-under-section-154-is-not-allowable-on-the-issue-of-carry-forward-of-allowances-while-completing-the-assessment-under-section-115j-as-the-issue-is-debatable/20%Monthly2018-07-20 11:35
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-undisclosed-income-admitted-and-declared-for-taxation-in-the-block-return-filed-under-the-provisions-of-section-158-bc/20%Monthly2019-01-07 13:07
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-levy-of-penalty-in-absence-of-recording-of-satisfaction-within-the-meaning-of-section-2711c-before-initiation-of-the-proceedings-under-section-2711c/20%Monthly2018-11-14 06:47
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-four-years-was-the-reasonable-period-to-issue-show-cause-under-section-201-by-the-assessing-officer-to-assessee-though-no-such-limitation-was-provided-in-section-201/20%Monthly2018-07-16 12:28
https://taxcaselaw.com/uttarakhand-h-c-single-appeal-permissible-several-orders-common-grounds-affects-orders-itat/20%Monthly2018-07-07 07:42
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-cash-credit-did-not-belong-to-3rd-parties-would-not-amount-to-false-declaration-as-contemplated-under-explanation-1-to-section-2711c-of-the-act-and-therefore-no-penalty-could/20%Monthly2018-09-25 12:12
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-a-sum-of-rs-1600000-and-rs-1075000-treated-as-income-of-the-assessee-under-sec-68-of-the-income-tax-act-by-the-assessing-officer-on-the-basis-of-admission-made-by-the-assesse/20%Monthly2018-10-12 12:03
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-retrenchment-compensation-claimed-by-the-assesses-for-payment-towards-workmen-in-the-closed-business-of-hotel-can-be-adjusted-towards-the-franchise-business-of-kids-camp-being-run/20%Monthly2018-10-11 11:14
https://taxcaselaw.com/calcutta-h-c-rent-and-repairs-and-maintenance-referable-to-guest-house-allowable-under-section-30-of-the-income-tax-act-1961-were-to-be-disallowed-under-section-374/20%Monthly2018-10-11 11:04
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-property-was-transferred-out-of-love-and-affection-and-hence-there-is-an-element-of-gift-involved-while-the-petition-for-divorce-was-filed-on-the-same-date-of-settlement-and-the-same/20%Monthly2019-01-07 12:55
https://taxcaselaw.com/calcutta-h-c-the-assessing-officer-is-under-an-obligation-under-the-act-of-1961-to-furnish-necessary-document-relied-upon-by-him-in-an-assessment-proceeding-and-intimate-the-date-of-personal-hearing/20%Monthly2019-01-07 12:57
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-addition-made-by-the-assessing-officer-is-justified-when-the-additional-income-of-rs-4-lakhs-offered-in-the-second-statement-on-11-5-1993-was-a-clear-mistake/20%Monthly2019-01-08 05:44
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-computation-of-eligible-business-income-for-the-purpose-of-computation-of-relief-under-section-80hh/20%Monthly2019-01-07 12:41
https://taxcaselaw.com/calcutta-h-c-no-expenditure-was-incurred-for-earning-the-dividend-income-could-be-sustained-on-the-mere-presumption-that-there-were-certain-expenditure-and-therefore-a-proportionate-amount-is-to-b/20%Monthly2019-01-08 06:19
https://taxcaselaw.com/calcutta-h-c-blending-of-tea-did-not-constitute-processing-and-that-the-appellant-was-not-entitled-to-deduction-under-section-80hhc-3a-of-the-income-tax-act/20%Monthly2019-01-08 06:00
https://taxcaselaw.com/rajasthan-h-c-where-annual-information-return-was-filed-belatedly-and-no-plausible-explanation-for-delay-was-given-imposition-of-penalty-under-section-271fa-was-justified/20%Monthly2018-10-26 08:13
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-applying-the-decision-of-the-supreme-court-in-the-case-of-f-s-ghandhi-1990-184-itr-34-sc-that-as-the-assessee-was-not-occupying-the-land-as-a-lessee-under-any-lease-agreement-the-pr/20%Monthly2018-12-28 06:53
https://taxcaselaw.com/aar-the-rate-at-which-tax-is-to-be-withheld-from-payments-made-by-transocean-to-boa-towards-time-charter-of-service-vessels-will-be-4-22-per-cent/20%Monthly2018-04-16 03:45
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-the-contract-between-the-gas-suppliers-and-the-assessee-is-a-contract-for-sale-of-goods-and-not-work-contract-so-as-to-attract-the-provisions-of-section-19ac/20%Monthly2018-10-26 08:16
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-difference-between-the-cost-of-construction-of-commercial-complex-constructed-by-the-assessee-at-no-11-palace-road-bangalore-declared-by-the-assessee-and-that-worked-out-by-the/20%Monthly2018-12-28 06:53
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-commissioner-has-not-furnished-any-opinion-on-any-of-the-issues-raised-in-his-order-under-section-263/20%Monthly2018-07-16 13:04
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-purpose-of-section-222e-a-partnership-firm-having-purchased-shares-through-its-partners-in-company-which-has-paid-loans-is-to-be-treated-as-a-shareholder-and-it-is-not-necessary-that/20%Monthly2018-10-10 12:07
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-payment-by-the-assessee-to-semco-vide-settlement-agreement-is-not-hit-by-the-provisions-in-explanation-1-to-section-37-of-the-income-tax-act-1961/20%Monthly2018-10-10 12:04
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-payment-made-as-royalty-has-element-of-capital-expenditure/20%Monthly2019-01-08 05:57
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-interest-income-on-fdrs-is-not-to-be-treated-as-income-from-other-sources-and-is-required-to-be-reduced-from-preproduction-expenses/20%Monthly2018-07-14 09:39
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-where-assessee-transferred-its-business-of-distribution-of-goods-to-a-company-on-receipt-of-commission-and-said-commission-payment-was-allowed-as-business-expenditure-in-hands-of-transfere/20%Monthly2018-04-16 03:43
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-whether-where-assessee-received-interest-on-investment-made-out-of-foreign-funds-which-was-chargeable-to-tax-at-concessional-rate-under-section-115h-said-special-treatment-could-not-be-e/20%Monthly2018-12-28 06:52
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-cancelling-the-order-passed-under-section-195-read-with-section-201-of-the-income-tax-act-1961/20%Monthly2019-01-07 13:18
https://taxcaselaw.com/madhya-pradesh-h-c-where-expenses-for-charitable-and-religious-purposes-have-been-incurred-in-earlier-year-and-said-expenses-are-adjusted-against-income-of-subsequent-year-income-of-that-year-can-b/20%Monthly2018-10-26 08:25
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-directing-the-assessing-officer-ao-to-re-compute-arms-length-price-alp-at-21-97-even-when-the-transfer-pricing-officer-tpo-had-arrived-at-35-26-after-due-consideration-o/20%Monthly2018-10-10 12:00
https://taxcaselaw.com/uttarakhand-h-c-production-is-wider-in-its-scope-as-compared-to-word-manufacture-and-when-word-production-is-used-in-juxtaposition-with-word-manufacture-it-will-take-in-bringing-in/20%Monthly2018-09-25 11:24
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-tribunal-was-right-in-deleting-the-addition-made-by-the-assessing-officer-on-account-of-purchase-of-land-by-the-assessee-when-incriminating-documents-found-during-the-search-is-show/20%Monthly2018-07-17 06:12
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-reassessment-made-for-the-assessment-year-1985-86-were-valid-under-section-17-of-the-wealth-tax-act/20%Monthly2018-07-25 12:21
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-the-assessee-is-entitled-to-depreciation-at-the-higher-rate-of-50-per-cent-on-truck-though-as-per-appendix-i-appended-to-rule-5-of-the-income-tax-rules-1962-higher-rate-of-depreciatio/20%Monthly2018-09-25 11:37
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-interpretation-of-section-234b4-made-by-the-itat-is-sustainable-in-law-as-the-same-being-based-on-misinterpretation-of-law-as-well-as-facts-of-the-case-in-as-much-as-order/20%Monthly2019-01-02 06:11
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-interest-tax-cannot-be-charged-on-interest-received-on-advances-to-dealers-and-suppliers/20%Monthly2018-07-13 12:08
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-direction-issued-by-the-dispute-resolution-panel-hereinafter-referred-to-as-drp-for-short-is-not-in-violation-of-section-144c5-or-8-of-the-act/20%Monthly2019-01-08 05:58
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-disallowance-of-software-expenditure-to-the-extent-as-capital-expenditure-as-software-used-for-the-first-time-will-have-to-be-considered-as-capital-in-nature/20%Monthly2018-10-04 12:49
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-whether-when-assessee-conceded-that-unaccounted-receipts-were-collected-for-payment-to-doctors-attending-to-patients-in-hospital-question-of-addition-in-hands-of-assessee-would-have-aris/20%Monthly2018-10-10 12:02
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-whether-special-investigation-team-so-constituted-was-to-be-charged-with-responsibility-of-preparing-a-comprehensive-action-plan-including-creation-of-necessary-institutional-structures-that-ca/20%Monthly2019-01-02 06:19
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-when-legislature-amends-provisions-of-act-with-retrospective-effect-it-cannot-be-said-that-there-was-failure-on-part-of-assessee-to-disclose-fully-and-truly-all-material-facts-at-relevan/20%Monthly2018-10-26 08:05
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-assessee-required-make-deposits-behalf-customers-various-accounts-mumbai-port-trust/20%Monthly2018-07-09 07:35