XML Sitemap

This is a XML Sitemap which is supposed to be processed by search engines which follow the XML Sitemap standard like Ask.com, Bing, Google and Yahoo.
It was generated using the WordPress content management system and the Google Sitemap Generator Plugin by Arne Brachhold.
You can find more information about XML sitemaps on sitemaps.org and Google's list of sitemap programs.

URLPriorityChange frequencyLast modified (GMT)
https://taxcaselaw.com/andhra-pradesh-h-c-the-annual-value-of-the-property-of-which-the-assessee-was-the-legal-owner-cannot-be-assessed-in-the-hands-of-the-assessee-under-s-22-of-the-it-act/20%Monthly2019-07-25 11:51
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-settlement-commission-was-bound-by-method-adopted-by-assessing-officer-as-to-reliance-upon-voluntary-statement-of-assessee/20%Monthly2018-09-29 06:04
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-whether-statement-recorded-section-1324-limited-application/20%Monthly2018-03-30 12:09
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-while-granting-requisite-permission-respondent-no-2-determined-the-fee-payable-to-the-petitioner-on-the-basis-of-the-scale-prescribed-by-the-institute-of-chartered-accountants-of-india/20%Monthly2019-08-05 11:12
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-the-tribunal-being-not-a-pure-question-of-law-but-one-depending-upon-various-facts-factors-and-the-same-being-disputed-disputable-the-tribunal-is-justified-in-considering-the-same-by-it/20%Monthly2019-08-14 09:21
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-original-assessment-was-completed-without-reference-to-statutory-provision-and-in-clear-violation-of-same-such-assessment-happened-to-be-a-mistake-that-could-be-rectified-under-section/20%Monthly2018-10-04 09:25
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-rental-income-taxable-head-profits-gains-business-profession/20%Monthly2018-03-29 11:58
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-illegality-by-deleting-the-addition-with-regard-to-interest-on-the-loan-taken-from-a-company-of-sahara-group/20%Monthly2018-03-29 11:53
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-whether-where-return-is-filed-by-assessee-in-response-to-notice-under-section-148-before-proceeding-to-decide-controversy-with-regard-to-escaped-assessment-a-notice-under-section-143/20%Monthly2018-04-13 03:26
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-whether-the-tribunal-erred-in-deleting-the-penalty-in-respect-of-the-aforesaid-two-items-amounting-to-rs-4-74-lacs-approximately-imposed-by-the-ao-under-s-2711c-of-the-it-act-1961/20%Monthly2019-08-10 10:54
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-signature-of-additional-commissioner-was-valid-in-view-of-such-retrospective-amendment/20%Monthly2019-01-11 08:32
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-the-second-respondent-sustaining-imposition-and-demand-of-interest-under-section-158bfa1/20%Monthly2019-01-11 07:55
https://taxcaselaw.com/uttarakhand-h-c-the-honble-itat-was-legally-correct-in-allowing-the-amount-received-on-account-of-reimbursement-of-expenses-received-from-its-customers-against-the-expenditure-incurred-by-t/20%Monthly2019-01-08 05:43
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-assessing-officer-on-account-of-late-deposit-of-employers-contribution-to-pf-epf-and-fpf-as-without-appreciating-the-fact-that-payments-were-not-made-by-the-assessee-with/20%Monthly2018-10-12 05:53
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-expenditure-incurred-on-the-exhibition-during-the-asst-yr-1997-98-being-only-rs-267162-there-was-an-eightfold-increase-in-the-expenditure-though-the-commission-income-earned-from/20%Monthly2019-08-24 05:52
https://taxcaselaw.com/patna-h-c-where-dropping-of-penalty-proceeding-was-definitely-erroneous-and-prejudicial-to-interest-of-revenue-commissioner-was-right-in-revising-such-order/20%Monthly2018-07-20 06:36
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-voluntarily-section-273a-act-means-free-will/20%Monthly2018-03-29 11:49
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-assessee-furnished-documents-such-as-share-application-money-copies-of-resolutions-by-the-board-of-directors-of-the-applicant-companies-as-well-as-the-bank-statements-memorandums-an/20%Monthly2019-08-14 12:01
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-assessee-had-filed-a-return-of-income-wherein-it-was-shown-that-in-the-year-in-question-the-assessee-company-had-disposed-of-75600-equity-shares-of-ranbaxy-laboratories-ltd-rll/20%Monthly2019-09-14 07:59
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-can-the-amount-of-share-money-be-regarded-as-undisclosed-income-under-s-68-of-it-act-1961/20%Monthly2019-07-17 07:43
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-this-is-the-second-round-of-litigation-before-this-court-in-respect-of-the-very-same-subject-matter-which-is-the-grant-of-exemption-under-section-1023civ/20%Monthly2019-01-07 12:28
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-appellant-is-not-entitled-to-claim-deduction-under-section-80-ia/20%Monthly2018-07-17 06:50
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-whether-fall-in-gp-stood-explained-by-the-assessee-or-not-was-a-question-of-fact/20%Monthly2019-07-26 08:05
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-responsibility-of-assessee-is-not-merely-to-fully-disclose-all-material-facts-but-to-disclose-them-fully-and-truly/20%Monthly2018-11-14 06:05
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-proviso-to-section-147-could-not-be-invoked-merely-because-there-was-an-amendment-in-future-which-was-introduced-retrospectively-and-covered-period-in-question/20%Monthly2018-07-17 06:31
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-petitions-arise-out-of-an-order-passed-by-the-first-respondent-the-chief-cit-mumbai-declining-to-grant-approval-to-the-petitioner-under-s-1023cvi/20%Monthly2019-08-03 12:26
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-capital-gains-arises-hand-owner/20%Monthly2018-05-26 08:04
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-payment-merely-supply-drawing-design-not-taxable-per-dtaa-india-usa/20%Monthly2018-03-30 12:05
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-whether-the-cita-had-erred-in-allowing-the-appeal-of-the-assessee-filed-against-the-charging-of-interest-under-ss-234b-and-234c-before-allowing-mat-credit-under-s-115jaa/20%Monthly2019-08-20 12:14
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-no-reassessment-notice-four-years-assessee-not-failed-disclose-fully-truly-material-facts/20%Monthly2018-05-26 08:03
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-there-was-delay-of-224-days-in-filing-the-appeal-cm-no-3907-of-2010-for-condonation-of-delay-in-filing-the-appeal-has-also-been-filed/20%Monthly2019-08-17 12:33
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-the-assessee-has-understated-the-income-or-has-claimed-excessive-lossdeduction-allowance-or-relied-in-the-return/20%Monthly2019-08-19 10:56