XML Sitemap

This is a XML Sitemap which is supposed to be processed by search engines which follow the XML Sitemap standard like Ask.com, Bing, Google and Yahoo.
It was generated using the WordPress content management system and the Google Sitemap Generator Plugin by Arne Brachhold.
You can find more information about XML sitemaps on sitemaps.org and Google's list of sitemap programs.

URLPriorityChange frequencyLast modified (GMT)
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-initiation-of-proceedings-under-s-263-was-not-justifiable-on-the-ground-that-the-order-of-the-ao-was-not-erroneous-or-prejudicial-to-the-interests-of-the-revenue/20%Monthly2019-10-25 10:19
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-the-assessee-filed-an-appeals-before-the-gujarat-high-court-inter-alia-challenging-the-capitalization-of-the-roll-over-charges-paid-in-respect-of-foreign-currency/20%Monthly2019-12-07 06:00
https://taxcaselaw.com/gauhati-h-c-the-tribunal-was-justified-and-correct-in-law-in-allowing-registration-under-s-12aa-of-the-it-act-1961-with-retrospective-effect-where-the-delay-in-the-submission-of-application-for-re/20%Monthly2019-07-22 13:02
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-tribunal-is-correct-in-setting-aside-the-order-passed-under-s-263-by-the-cit-without-discussing-the-facts-of-the-case-and-the-clauses-of-the-agreement-between-nhai-and-the-assessee/20%Monthly2019-10-25 12:32
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-same-was-a-guest-house-expense-which-was-not-allowable-under-ss-374-and-375/20%Monthly2019-07-25 12:24
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-why-the-assessee-should-not-be-treated-as-in-default-under-s-2011-in-respect-of-non-deduction-short-deduction-of-tax/20%Monthly2019-08-21 12:18
https://taxcaselaw.com/aar-whether-the-applicant-in-the-stated-facts-and-circumstances-would-have-a-pe-in-india-under-art-51-or-58-of-the-india-singapore-double-taxation-avoidance-agreement-india-singapore-dtaa/20%Monthly2019-10-26 12:04
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-whether-the-tribunal-has-set-aside-the-penalty-imposed-by-the-ao-under-s-158bfa2-of-the-it-act-1961-for-valid-andjustifiable-reasons/20%Monthly2019-10-01 08:22
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-impugned-order-falls-within-the-parameters-of-the-jurisdiction-under-s-2542-of-the-act/20%Monthly2019-10-01 08:06
https://taxcaselaw.com/aar-whether-the-amounts-received-receivable-by-joint-stock-company-foreign-economic-association-technopromexport-applicant-or-jsc-technopromexport-from-national-thermal-power-corporati/20%Monthly2019-11-28 07:46
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-registration-granted-to-a-trust-under-section-12a-for-a-period-prior-to-insertion-of-sub-section-3-of-section-12aa-could-not-be-withdrawn-by-invoking-sub-section-3-of-section-12aa/20%Monthly2018-04-13 03:37
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-sales-tax-and-excise-duty-collected-during-the-assessment-year-should-not-form-part-of-the-total-turnover-before-computing-the-deduction-for-the-purpose-of-computing-deduction-unde/20%Monthly2018-04-13 03:39
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-whether-in-the-facts-and-circumstances-the-respondent-was-justified-in-denying-interest-on-belated-refund-claimed-for-the-asst-yr-1995-96-by-the-order-impugned/20%Monthly2019-10-03 11:31
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-compensation-received-by-him-on-purchase-of-the-award-was-offered-for-tax-under-the-head-capital-gains/20%Monthly2019-01-11 07:54
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-whether-the-assessee-is-liable-to-pay-penalty-as-required-under-s-2711c-sic-s-271c1a-of-the-act/20%Monthly2019-07-24 06:58
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-ao-had-made-on-account-of-undisclosed-stock-found-with-the-assessee-during-the-course-of-a-survey/20%Monthly2019-08-19 06:07
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-bonafide-belief-tax-not-deductible-can-reasonable-cause-not-imposing-penalty-us-271c/20%Monthly2018-05-26 07:52
https://taxcaselaw.com/aar-on-the-facts-and-circumstances-of-the-case-whether-the-applicant-is-liable-to-tax-in-india-in-relation-to-the-proposed-contribution-of-shares-of-afiil/20%Monthly2019-10-26 11:10
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-the-tribunal-was-right-in-law-in-upholding-the-addition-of-rs-175000000-as-unexplained-expenditure-under-s-69c/20%Monthly2019-08-23 07:36
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-cita-was-empowered-to-give-a-finding-that-the-expenditure-was-capital-in-nature-when-such-issue-was-not-before-it/20%Monthly2019-07-26 07:13
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-there-is-reason-to-believe-that-income-chargeable-to-tax-had-escaped-assessment-within-the-meaning-of-s-147/20%Monthly2019-09-28 10:13
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-cit-has-failed-to-consider-very-important-aspect-that-entire-income-derived-is-being-used-only-for-charitable-purposes-in-india/20%Monthly2019-08-12 08:13
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-tribunal-was-right-in-upholding-the-disallowance-of-depreciation-on-the-sale-and-lease-back-transaction-with-the-tneb-even-though-the-appellant-had-satisfied-all-the-conditions-laid-d/20%Monthly2019-01-05 11:10
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-revenue-is-aggrieved-by-the-finding-of-the-tribunal-that-the-payment-of-us-924500-by-the-assessee-as-per-the-agreement-dt-10th-july-1996-to-img-canada-through-imc-india-did-no/20%Monthly2019-12-10 11:35
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-whether-on-a-true-and-correct-appreciation-of-the-relationship-between-the-assessee-and-its-distributors-the-learned-tribunal-erred-in-holding-that-the-payments-paid-by-the-assessee-are-n/20%Monthly2019-09-13 11:09
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-a-house-under-construction-neither-being-a-house-nor-a-plot-is-not-liable-to-tax-under-the-wt-act-1957/20%Monthly2019-08-23 06:20
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-provision-for-doubtful-debts-provision-for-doubtful-advances-and-provision-for-gratuity-made-by-the-assessee-to-the-book-profit-while-making-computation-under-section-115ja/20%Monthly2018-04-13 03:37
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-lease-rentals-received-from-lipton-export-hindustan-lever-were-taxable-under-the-head-income-from-house-property-and-not-under-the-head-profits-and-gains-of-business-or-professi/20%Monthly2019-08-03 12:38
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-do-you-send-the-similar-components-for-machining-and-grinding-to-other-concerns-except-baddi/20%Monthly2019-09-26 11:19
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnatala-h-c-where-assessee-company-had-issued-shares-and-amounts-were-collected-in-terms-of-applications-made-to-assessee-and-except-three-persons/20%Monthly2019-06-08 12:18
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-notices-are-only-show-cause-notices-calling-the-appellant-to-deliver-within-30-days-from-the-date-of-the-service-of-the-notice/20%Monthly2020-01-06 08:42
https://taxcaselaw.com/aar-whether-the-amount-receivable-by-laird-usa-as-per-the-assignment-agreement-is-taxable-in-india-having-regard-to-the-provisions-of-the-act-and-the-double-taxation-avoidance-agreement-between-indi/20%Monthly2019-10-01 07:42
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-assessee-would-be-entitled-to-claim-depreciation-as-well-as-expenditure-under-s-32-and-s-37-of-the-act-respectively-even-when-admittedly-no-business-activity-is-carried-on-by-t/20%Monthly2019-10-25 10:50
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-petitioner-derives-a-major-source-of-its-income-from-its-business-of-providing-audio-visual-television-software-content-films-events-and-other-like-activities-f/20%Monthly2019-09-25 10:24
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-petitioner-is-engaged-inter-alia-in-the-business-of-providing-audio-visual-television-software-content-films-events-and-other-like-activities/20%Monthly2019-09-25 10:18
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-assessee-had-been-incurring-such-expenditure-in-the-past-as-and-when-the-need-arose-and-it-was-towards-preserving-and-maintaining-the-existing-asset/20%Monthly2019-11-27 07:47
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-deduction-claimed-by-the-assessee-under-s-80-i/20%Monthly2019-11-27 07:29
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-and-in-law-the-tribunal-was-justified-in-allowing-brought-forward-speculation-loss-to-be-set-off-against-delivery-based-profits/20%Monthly2019-11-27 12:36
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-whether-the-rental-income-derived-by-the-firm-from-leasing-out-to-its-partners-where-no-outsiders-are-invoked-is-exempted-from-taxation-on-the-principles-of-mutuality/20%Monthly2019-08-10 12:05
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-ao-had-passed-the-assessment-order-in-violation-of-the-principles-of-natural-justice-in-as-much-as-he-had-neither-provided-copies-of-the-seized-material-to-the-assessee-nor-had-he-allo/20%Monthly2019-11-28 09:41
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-whether-the-assesseesociety-could-be-said-to-be-engaged-in-a-cottage-industry-under-s-80p2aii-of-the-act-or-whether-it-could-be-said-to-be-engaged-in-the-collective-disposal-of-labour-of/20%Monthly2019-10-24 07:11
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-tribunal-whereby-the-block-assessment-had-been-held-to-be-bad-in-law-and-resultantly-quashed/20%Monthly2019-10-01 06:43
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-the-cita-directing-the-ao-to-allow-the-claim-of-depreciation-as-per-the-it-rules-1962-for-the-purposes-of-computing-the-book-profit-under-s-115j/20%Monthly2020-01-07 06:05
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-the-department-sought-reopening-of-the-assessment-based-on-the-opinion-given-by-the-dvo/20%Monthly2019-08-14 05:59
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-appellant-being-the-owner-of-a-residential-property-situate-at-no-16-first-main-road-r-a-puram-chennai-entered-into-an-agreement-dt-29th-march-1993-with-m-s-chettinad-invest/20%Monthly2019-10-03 12:24
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-whether-the-assessee-is-entitled-to-the-benefit-of-a-deduction-under-s-80-ia-of-the-act-and-whether-the-tribunal-was-justified-in-holding-that-the-assessee-had-carried-on-the-business-of/20%Monthly2019-11-28 12:08
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-order-of-rectification-passed-under-s-154-of-the-act-for-the-asst-yr-1998-99-levying-interest-for-the-first-time-under-s-234b-is-valid/20%Monthly2019-09-12 11:46
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-interest-on-refund-of-income-tax-paid-in-excess-was-not-attributable-to-the-income-derived-from-the-business-of-banking-within-the-meaning-of-s-80p2ai/20%Monthly2019-11-28 08:26
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-whether-the-answered-in-tribunal-was-i-right-in-treating-the-beer-bottles-as-plant/20%Monthly2019-07-24 07:39
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-ao-had-noticed-discrepancy-of-stock/20%Monthly2019-08-23 08:01
https://taxcaselaw.com/aar-am-i-non-resident-in-india-in-previous-year-2008-09/20%Monthly2019-12-06 11:18
https://taxcaselaw.com/madhya-pradesh-h-c-the-cita-as-well-as-the-tribunal-committed-an-error-in-interfering-in-the-reopening-of-the-assessments-under-s-147-148-of-the-act-and-in-quashing-the-consequent-assessment-orde/20%Monthly2019-07-30 11:06
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-where-the-gross-total-income-of-a-domestic-company-in-any-previous-year-includes-any-income-by-way-of-dividends-from-another-domestic-company-there-shall-in-accordance-with-and-subjec/20%Monthly2019-09-29 08:22
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-the-tribunal-was-justified-in-holding-that-by-the-levy-of-interest-under-s-139-of-the-it-act-1961-the-ito-must-be-deemed-to-ha/20%Monthly2019-12-07 06:05
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-whether-in-the-facts-and-circumstances-of-the-case-the-tribunal-erred-in-law-in-holding-that-the-loss-of-one-unit-could-not-be-set-off-against-the-other-unit-in-view-of-the-provisions-of/20%Monthly2019-12-10 11:29
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-the-learned-addl-cit-has-issued-a-show-cause-notice-for-conducting-for-special-audit-under-s-1422a-of-the-it-act/20%Monthly2019-08-20 11:19
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-amount-paid-by-the-firm-to-the-retiring-partners-is-on-account-of-retiring-partners-renunciation-of-their-rights-to-have-free-trade-and-profession-envisaged-in-the-constitution-of-i/20%Monthly2019-12-10 10:22
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-why-did-you-not-receive-any-amount-as-sale-consideration/20%Monthly2019-10-01 07:56
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-whether-the-delay-in-filing-of-the-appeal-beyond-the-period-of-120-days-prescribed-by-s-260a2-a-of-the-it-act-1961-could-be-condoned-by-entertaining-an-application-under/20%Monthly2019-10-24 07:16
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-the-tribunal-was-right-in-law-in-upholding-the-validity-of-section-147-148-notice/20%Monthly2019-05-16 06:38
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-assessee-carried-on-business-during-the-asst-yr-2003-04-as-the-assessee-did-a-computer-programming-job-for-fortis-financial-services-for-which-payment-had-also-been-received-by-the-a/20%Monthly2019-11-28 12:14
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-order-passed-under-s-263-by-the-cit-rohtak-was-only-a-change-of-opinion-and-consequently-did-not-meet-the-requirements-of-the-provisions-for-invoking-his-powers-under-s-2/20%Monthly2019-07-23 12:03
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-a-plain-reading-of-the-provisions-of-the-scheme-would-show-that-the-tax-payable-under-the-scheme-shall-be-paid-within-the-time-specified-is-the-general-rule-provided-in/20%Monthly2019-10-03 12:00
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-the-ao-has-not-examined-whether-the-debt-has-in-fact-been-written-off-in-accounts-of-the-assessee/20%Monthly2019-10-22 11:58
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-the-tribunal-was-right-in-law-in-confirming-the-order-of-the-cita-in-holding-that-the-assessee-is-eligible-for-deduction-und/20%Monthly2019-12-09 11:48
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-assessee-had-incurred-the-said-expenses-for-repairs-and-maintenance-of-the-existing-plan-irrigation-of-the-assessee-in-the-assessees-golf-course/20%Monthly2019-10-24 09:28
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-an-assessee-during-the-course-of-his-business-can-be-treated-as-material-to-levy-penalty-upon-an-assessee-specially-when-the-trade-practice-and-the-manner-of-accounting-is-neither-dou/20%Monthly2018-10-12 05:55
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-itat-must-give-precise-statement-fact-controversy-involved-thereafter-deals-illegality-irregularities/20%Monthly2018-03-29 10:36
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-tribunal-was-justified-in-deleting-the-additions-of-rs-5666950-and-rs-257502-made-by-the-ao-by-disallowing-the-claim-of-bad-debts-written-off-which-were-declared-on-ac/20%Monthly2019-08-05 12:08
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-tribunal-has-erred-in-holding-that-the-amount-of-rs-14-79-lacs-claimed-by-the-assessee-was-allowable-as-a-bad-debt-under-s-361vii-of-the-it-act/20%Monthly2019-07-25 11:31
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-whether-such-interest-income-would-qualify-for-deduction-as-business-income-under-s-80p2ai-of-the-it-act-1961/20%Monthly2019-12-06 11:30
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-satisfaction-as-mandated-under-s-158bd-of-the-said-act-was-not-recorded/20%Monthly2019-12-10 11:05
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-vide-order-sheet-entry-dt-19th-may-2003-the-assessee-had-duly-noted-the-fact-that-notice-under-s-158bd-was-initially-issued-by-registered-post-which-was-received-back-and-l/20%Monthly2019-10-03 10:56
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-petitioner-made-its-claim-for-the-first-time-in-respect-of-the-profits-derived-from-the-industrial-undertaking-under-s-80-ib-of-the-act-for-asst-yr-2001-02/20%Monthly2019-07-24 07:12
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-assessee-was-engaged-in-business-of-providing-consultancy-services-to-foreign-clients-from-whom-it-earned-foreign-exchange/20%Monthly2018-04-13 03:42
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-profit-of-the-daman-unit-which-is-eligible-unit-has-been-computed-at-rs-98-43-lakhs-and-if-the-assessee-had-income-equivalent-to-or-more-than-rs-98-43-lakhs-deduction-would-be-perm/20%Monthly2019-08-13 11:48
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-rental-income-earned-by-the-asseessee-from-the-letting-out-of-shops-is-assessable-under-the-head-income-from-house-property-and-not-income-from-profits-and-gains-of-bu/20%Monthly2019-08-05 11:30
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-this-petition-seeks-a-direction-to-quash-releasing-of-gold-jewellery-weighing-1046-gms-to-unauthorised-persons-and-to-give-compensation-to-the-petitioner/20%Monthly2019-09-26 11:15
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-assessee-was-prevented-by-a-reasonable-cause-from-payment-of-self-assessment-tax-while-filing-the-return-of-income/20%Monthly2019-10-25 09:44
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-whether-the-income-derived-by-the-charities-from-letting-out-of-kalyana-mandapam-on-licence-could-be-considered-as-a-property-income-or-business-income/20%Monthly2019-10-24 13:03
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-whether-service-of-notice-on-the-assessee-under-s-1432-within-the-prescribed-period-of-time-is-a-prerequisite-for-framing-the-block-assessment-under-chapter-xiv-b-of-the-it-act-1961/20%Monthly2020-01-06 10:37
https://taxcaselaw.com/calcutta-h-c-the-ao-did-not-form-opinion-before-referring-the-matter-to-the-departmental-valuation-officer-without-appreciating-the-fact-that-the-ao-did-not-same-in-writing-in-the-order-sheet-dt-12/20%Monthly2019-07-17 10:14
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-the-tribunal-was-justified-in-upholding-the-order-of-the-cit-passed-under-s-263-directing-the-ito-to-include-the-sum-of-rs-1/20%Monthly2019-12-09 11:57
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-whether-the-delay-in-filing-of-the-appeal-beyond-the-period-of-120-days-prescribed-by-s-260a2-a-of-the-it-act-1961-could-be-condoned-by-entertaining-an-application-under-2/20%Monthly2019-11-28 11:55
https://taxcaselaw.com/aar-whether-the-amount-received-receivable-by-the-applicant-from-larsen-toubro-ltd-for-offshore-supply-and-delivery-of-overseas-fabricated-items-are-liable-to-tax-in-india-under-the-provisions-of/20%Monthly2019-12-10 11:52
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-tribunal-was-right-in-law-in-cancelling-the-penalty-under-s-2711c-on-the-basis-of-a-miscellaneous-petition-for-rectification-when-the-tribunal-has-rejected-a-similar-petition-by/20%Monthly2019-10-24 09:40
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-when-an-alternative-equally-efficacious-remedy-is-open-to-a-litigant-he-should-be-required-to-pursue-that-remedy-and-not-invoke-the-special-jurisdiction-of-the-high-court-to-issue-a-prer/20%Monthly2020-01-07 06:25
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-tribunal-is-the-final-fact-finding-authority-and-the-findings-recorded-with-regard-to-the-deletion-of-the-additions-are-pure-findings-of-fact-there-is-no-logic-whatsoever-in-the-conte/20%Monthly2019-12-07 06:12
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-income-tax-appellate-tribunal-was-right-in-dismissing-the-appeal-of-the-revenue-merely-on-the-ground-that-the-tax-effect-was-less-than-the-minimum-specified-in-the-boards-instructio/20%Monthly2019-01-07 13:00