XML Sitemap

This is a XML Sitemap which is supposed to be processed by search engines which follow the XML Sitemap standard like Ask.com, Bing, Google and Yahoo.
It was generated using the WordPress content management system and the Google Sitemap Generator Plugin by Arne Brachhold.
You can find more information about XML sitemaps on sitemaps.org and Google's list of sitemap programs.

URLPriorityChange frequencyLast modified (GMT)
https://taxcaselaw.com/madhya-pradesh-h-c-adjustment-depreciation-required-made-basis-schedule-xiv-companies-act/20%Monthly2018-03-29 10:47
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-whether-interest-arising-on-non-performing-assets-cannot-be-recognized-as-income-and-fixed-on-accrual-basis/20%Monthly2018-03-29 10:51
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-interest-earned-by-the-assessee-on-late-payment-received-from-the-customers-is-eligible-for-deduction-under-section-80-ia-of-the-income-tax-act-1961/20%Monthly2018-12-17 06:04
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-whether-the-tribunal-is-justified-in-law-in-disallowing-the-interest-paid-to-loan-creditors-under-the-facts-and-circumstances-of-the-appellants-case/20%Monthly2019-07-25 12:01
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-proceedings-under-section-158bd-are-time-barred-when-the-assessment-was-completed-within-two-years-from-the-end-of-the-month-when-the-notice-under-the-correct-section-was-issued/20%Monthly2019-05-18 10:40
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-no-penalty-for-concealment-is-leviable-under-section-2711c-if-the-assessment-is-based-on-estimate-basis/20%Monthly2019-01-11 07:54
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-investment-surplus-funds-earning-interest-income-member-bank-club-not-principle-mutuality/20%Monthly2018-07-03 05:46
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-the-commission-and-subsidy-paid-to-the-cane-growers-formed-part-of-the-purchase-price-of-the-case-and-thus-allowable-for-deduction-under-s-371-of-the-it-act-1961/20%Monthly2019-07-24 09:43
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-which-included-a-rough-paper-with-noting-pertaining-to-sale-transaction-receipt-of-amounts-etc-stated-to-be-containing-the-signature-of-the-assessee-and-sworn-statements-recorded-unde/20%Monthly2019-07-26 09:23
https://taxcaselaw.com/himachal-pradesh-h-c-converting-limestone-into-limestone-powder-was-a-manufacturing-activity-and-income-derived-from-such-activity-was-thus-eligible-for-deduction-under-s-80-ia-80-ib/20%Monthly2019-08-20 10:03
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-assessee-is-in-default-under-s-2011-of-the-act-and-consequently-liable-to-pay-interest-under-s-2011a-of-the-act-on-account-of-the-assessee-failing-to-deduct-tax-at-source-fro/20%Monthly2019-07-22 12:01
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-reopened-assessments-which-had-been-made-to-consider-the-deduction-under-s-80hhc-of-the-act-wrongly-claimed-the-assessee-can-be-permitted-to-agitate-a-new-claim-that-the-entire-income/20%Monthly2019-07-26 11:38
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-the-appeals-filed-by-the-assessee-as-well-as-the-department-against-the-modification-of-the-income-determined-by-the-ao-for-the-asst-yr-1997-98-by-the-cita/20%Monthly2019-09-13 07:37
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-whether-the-order-of-the-learned-tribunal-is-perverse-as-it-failed-to-actually-discover-the-factum-of-distance-of-the-land-from-the-municipal-limit-and-only-distinguished-betwee/20%Monthly2019-07-24 11:09
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-the-commission-paid-by-doordarshan-kendra-which-is-under-the-control-of-the-respondent-to-advertising-agencies-for-advertisments-canvassed-by-them-does-not-attract-the-provisions-of-s-19/20%Monthly2019-09-13 07:28
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-penalty-under-s-271-1c-amounting-to-rs-1-50-lakhs-imposed-by-the-ao-ignoring-the-fact-that-the-assessee-violated-the-provisions-of-s-80-ia-of-the-it-act-1961-which-at/20%Monthly2019-07-27 12:13
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-whether-on-the-true-and-correct-interpretation-of-s-147-proviso-the-initiation-and-conclusion-of-the-proceedings-is-sustainable-without-discharging-the-department-onus-for-brin/20%Monthly2019-07-27 10:59
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-the-deduction-is-allowable-under-s-80hha-with-regard-to-the-income-derived-from-industrial-undertaking-before-setting-off-such-income-against-loss-from-a-non-industrial-unit-in-terms/20%Monthly2019-07-26 10:48
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-the-amount-was-assessable-on-accrual-basis-based-on-declaration-of-eligibility-for-refund-by-the-supreme-court-in-the-electricity-tariff-case-and-therefore-it-was-assessed-for-the-asst/20%Monthly2019-08-23 05:54
https://taxcaselaw.com/kearala-h-c-granting-deduction-estimated-amount-expenditure-interest-income/20%Monthly2018-03-29 10:54
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-expenses-incurred-by-the-assessee-for-issue-of-convertible-debentures-relating-to-part-b-of-the-debenture-as-adverted-to-in-the-course-of-its-order-that-as-debentures-get-converted-int/20%Monthly2019-05-18 09:33
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-appellant-assessee-is-entitled-for-deduction-claimed-under-s-80-ib-of-the-act-by-treating-the-export-incentive-of-rs-30840231-including-depb-profits-as-profits-receive/20%Monthly2019-07-26 12:28
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-whether-the-tribunal-was-justified-in-cancelling-the-assessment-made-under-s-1431a-for-the-reason-that-disallowances-made-do-not-fall-within-the-description-prima-facie-inadmissibl/20%Monthly2019-09-13 11:38
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-issue-of-taxability-of-compensation-on-agricultural-land-and-interest-thereon-received-by-the-assessee-being-a-highly-debatable-issue-on-which-two-views-are-clearly-possible/20%Monthly2019-01-11 07:33
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-tribunal-has-quashed-the-proceedings-under-s-147-148-of-the-act-on-the-ground-that-notice-for-reassessment-served-upon-the-assessee-was-not-on-the-basis-of-a-valid-reason/20%Monthly2019-07-23 11:24
https://taxcaselaw.com/himachal-pradesh-h-c-freight-subsidy-received-from-the-government-by-the-assessee-is-allowed-to-be-included-as-profits-derived-from-the-industrial-undertaking-and-eligible-for-deduction-under-s/20%Monthly2019-08-10 10:59
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-appellant-assessee-is-entitled-for-deduction-claimed-under-s-80-ib-of-the-act-by-treating-the-export-incentive-of-rs-30840231-including-depb-profits-as-profits-receive-2/20%Monthly2019-07-27 09:44
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-no-action-us-263-assessee-produced-source-fund-investment-made-along-bank-statement-o-enquired/20%Monthly2018-04-04 10:41
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-the-deduction-under-s-80-o-of-the-act-is-admissible-only-in-respect-of-income-received-from-foreign-enterprises-in-consideration-of-use-outside-india-of-any-patent-invention-design-re/20%Monthly2019-07-27 10:55
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-tribunal-was-right-in-law-in-allowing-the-deduction-of-rs-620000-on-account-of-payments-made-to-the-sub-contractors-from-the-gross-contract-receipts/20%Monthly2019-08-12 07:37
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-assessee-had-a-right-to-exercise-option-to-adopt-its-previous-year-from-1st-dec-1983-to-30th-june-1984-under-s-31ei-and-was-not-required-to-obtain-permission-under/20%Monthly2019-08-12 07:31
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-circumstances-evidences-on-record-and-established-principles-of-law-the-tribunal-was-justified-in-confirming-the-orders-of-the-authorities-below-in-fin/20%Monthly2019-08-12 08:22
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-tribunal-was-right-in-law-in-entertaining-a-second-application-under-s-2542-of-the-act-raising-the-same-and-similar-points-which-had-been-dealt-with-by-it-in-the-first-applic/20%Monthly2019-08-23 06:41
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-present-petition-under-art-226-of-the-constitution-styled-as-a-public-interest-litigation-has-been-filed-seeking-multifarious-reliefs-including-of-declaration-arising-from-the-grievan/20%Monthly2019-09-12 10:30
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-the-tribunal-was-justified-in-cancelling-the-reassessment-proceedings-completed-against-the-assessee-under-s-147-for-the-reason-that-the-officer-had-no-justification-to-reopen-the-origin/20%Monthly2019-09-13 08:07
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-whether-itat-correct-accepting-affidavit-filed-assessee-0which-never-produced-assessing-officer/20%Monthly2018-04-04 10:39
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-tribunal-is-right-in-law-in-upholding-the-findings-of-the-aac-jalandhar-range-jalandhar-to-the-effect-be-said-to-be-proper-service-especially-when-the-assessee-has-refused/20%Monthly2019-08-12 08:03
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-whether-the-order-cancelling-penalty-imposed-under-s-2711c-of-the-act-without-giving-a-finding-about-the-satisfactory-cause-shown-by-the-assessee-is-perverse-and-arbitrary-and-cal/20%Monthly2019-08-05 11:04
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-petitioners-claimed-to-be-angadia-courier-for-release-of-four-gunny-bags-which-were-seized-from-them-at-old-delhi-railway-station/20%Monthly2019-07-23 11:05
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-wherein-the-order-imposing-penalty-under-s-2711c-of-the-act-has-been-cancelled-by-the-appellate-authority-by-allowing-the-appeal/20%Monthly2019-08-05 12:34
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-belgaum-is-a-backward-area-as-per-the-notification-dt-19th-dec-1986-is-contrary-to-law-and-perverse-and-arbitrary-as-to-call-for-interference-in-this-appeal/20%Monthly2019-08-20 10:53
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-whether-the-tribunal-was-right-in-holding-that-expression-concealed-particulars-of-income-or-inaccurate-particulars-of-such-income-as-defined-under/20%Monthly2019-08-05 10:45
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-assessee-borrowed-massive-amounts-from-banks-and-advanced-the-same-to-sister-concerns-namely-the-partnership-firms-in-which-it-was-a-partner-without-collecting-any-interest/20%Monthly2019-07-24 07:57
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-the-assessee-was-found-to-be-engaged-in-sale-of-liquor-under-the-name-other-liquor-sales-the-accounts-of-which-were-found-in-the-computer-was-also-seized/20%Monthly2019-09-14 06:39
https://taxcaselaw.com/the-debt-written-off-by-him-is-indeed-a-bad-deft-for-the-purpose-of-allowance-under-s-361vii-of-the-it-act-1961-by-relying-on-the-order-passed-by-tribunal-in-the-case-of-dy-cit-vs-oman-interna/20%Monthly2019-08-21 12:58
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-whether-the-tribunal-was-correct-in-law-in-deleting-the-addition-of-rs-6962655-made-by-the-ao-under-s-92-r-w-s-40a2-of-the-it-act-1961/20%Monthly2019-08-12 06:58
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-assesses-were-liable-to-be-assessed-for-the-profits-earned-by-them-on-account-of-the-compensation-received-by-them-for-acquisition-of-agricultural-lands-by-terming-the-same-to-be-ad/20%Monthly2019-08-14 06:43
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-the-connected-cases-arise-from-the-block-assessment-completed-in-the-case-of-two-assessees-under-s-158bd-r-w-s-158bc-of-the-it-act-1961/20%Monthly2019-07-24 06:28
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-no-income-from-house-property-was-assessed-even-though-claim-of-tds-without-disclosing-income-under-this-head-was-the-ground-for-reopening/20%Monthly2019-07-22 12:42
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-whether-the-tribunal-was-justified-in-confirming-the-order-of-the-cita-deleting-the-addition-of-rs-543000-and-rs-404000-seized-from-the-assessee-during-search-made-on-19th-dec-2/20%Monthly2019-08-14 10:58
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-addition-respect-trading-results-deleted-addition-account-unexplained-credit-entries-can-not-automatically-deleted/20%Monthly2018-04-09 10:13
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-rejecting-deduction-section-80-ib-respect-duty-drawback/20%Monthly2018-03-29 10:57
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-the-original-assessment-completed-was-directed-to-be-revised-by-the-cit-through-orders-issued-under-s-263/20%Monthly2019-07-24 06:32