XML Sitemap

This is a XML Sitemap which is supposed to be processed by search engines which follow the XML Sitemap standard like Ask.com, Bing, Google and Yahoo.
It was generated using the WordPress content management system and the Google Sitemap Generator Plugin by Arne Brachhold.
You can find more information about XML sitemaps on sitemaps.org and Google's list of sitemap programs.

URLPriorityChange frequencyLast modified (GMT)
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-whether-the-tribunal-was-correct-in-law-in-holding-that-the-assessee-is-neither-a-financial-company-nor-a-credit-institution-in-terms-of-s-25b-of-the-interest-tax-act-1974-and-as-such/20%Monthly2019-08-10 11:05
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-whether-the-tribunal-was-correct-in-law-in-deleting-the-addition-of-interest-income-from-fdrs-amounting-to-rs-685624-under-the-head-income-from-other-sources-by-treating-it-as-busin/20%Monthly2019-08-23 07:43
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-rectification-entries-were-passed-subsequently-and-the-goods-were-taxed-during-the-asst-yr-199798-in-the-hands-of-m-s-rajesh-industries-which-is-contrary-to-the-facts-of-the-case-si/20%Monthly2019-08-10 13:03
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-there-were-no-irregularities-pointed-out-by-the-ao-in-order-to-reject-the-books-of-account-and-estimate-the-gross-profit-based-on-the-previous-years-despite-the-fact-that-in-the-survey/20%Monthly2019-08-20 10:59
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-whether-the-payment-made-in-cash-in-excess-of-rs-20000-contrary-to-s-40a-towards-the-purchase-of-lottery-tickets-from-m-s-mysore-sales-international-ltd-is-entitled-for-exemption-u/20%Monthly2019-08-14 09:51
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-the-tribunal-justified-in-cancelling-the-disallowance-of-excess-over-5-per-cent-discount-given-by-the-assessee-to-its-managing-director-towards-sales-commission/20%Monthly2019-07-22 12:28
https://taxcaselaw.com/himachal-pradesh-h-c-whether-the-absence-of-the-proviso-to-section-13-of-the-interest-tax-act-1974-corresponding-to-explanation-3-to-section-2711c-of-the-income-tax-act-1961-could-render-the/20%Monthly2019-05-18 10:39
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-disallowing-the-claim-of-provision-of-warranty-made-during-the-assessment-year-2004-05/20%Monthly2018-07-17 06:54
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-interest-received-by-the-assessee-on-refund-relating-to-previous-year-is-assessable-to-tax-in-the-assessment-year-in-which-such-interest-is-granted-to-the-assessee-along-with-the-refund/20%Monthly2019-08-12 06:48
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-honble-tribunal-was-justified-in-setting-aside-the-order-of-the-ao-with-a-direction-to-frame-fresh-assessment-on-the-basis-of-the-decision-of-the-excise-tribunal-in-regard/20%Monthly2019-07-26 12:01
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-having-violated-the-provision-of-s-269ss-of-the-act-the-tribunal-was-right-in-law-in-deleting-the-penalty-imposed-un/20%Monthly2019-07-26 11:16
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-the-amount-received-by-the-employees-of-the-rbi-opting-for-optional-early-retirement-scheme-do-not-qualify-for-deduction-under-s-1010c/20%Monthly2019-07-30 11:36
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-whether-the-interest-accrued-on-the-delayed-payment-of-enhanced-amount-of-compensation-would-partake-of-the-character-of-compensation-taken-from-agricultural-land/20%Monthly2019-08-14 10:14
https://taxcaselaw.com/himachal-pradesh-h-c-interest-subsidy-received-by-the-assessee-under-a-scheme-formulated-by-the-state-government-forms-part-of-profits-derived-from-the-industrial-undertaking-and-is-hence-eligib/20%Monthly2019-08-22 12:26
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-losses-of-the-asst-yr-1995-96-claimed-in-the-belated-return-had-to-be-set-off-against-the-undisclosed-income-for-the-block-assessment-period-1st-april-1985-to-9th-nov-1995/20%Monthly2019-07-17 07:55
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-the-assessing-authority-could-not-have-referred-the-matter-to-the-departmental-valuation-officer-dvo-without-the-books-of-account-being-rejected/20%Monthly2019-08-14 05:54
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-whether-the-refusal-on-the-part-of-the-respondents-departmental-authorities-to-issue-exemption-certificate-under-s-197-of-the-it-act/20%Monthly2019-08-19 12:44
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-the-tribunal-was-right-in-law-in-holding-that-in-view-of-circular-issued-by-the-cbdt-disallowance-under-s-40ai-of-the-act/20%Monthly2019-07-24 09:33
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-the-assessee-is-engaged-in-letting-out-rooms-in-the-lodging-house-and-the-konny-building-is-one-rented-out-to-the-bank-on-long-term-lease/20%Monthly2019-08-12 07:21
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-whether-the-contract-in-question-is-a-contract-of-sale-or-a-contract-of-work-and-labour/20%Monthly2019-08-14 06:55
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-this-revision-petition-is-directed-against-the-judgment-dt-14th-march-1991-passed-by-the-addl-sessions-judge-ambala-whereby-the-judgment-of-conviction-and-sentence-order-d/20%Monthly2019-09-12 10:53
https://taxcaselaw.com/madhya-pradesh-h-c-petitioner-had-made-substantial-investment-in-the-construction-of-her-hospital-building/20%Monthly2019-08-19 12:39
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-setting-aside-the-matter-on-legal-issue-of-service-of-notice-under-section-148/20%Monthly2019-01-11 08:09
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-basic-details-like-pan-bank-details-given-o-must-investigated-adding-share-application-money-us-68/20%Monthly2018-04-11 12:19
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-whether-the-tribunal-was-correct-in-law-in-cancelling-setting-aside-the-order-passed-by-the-cit-under-s-263-of-the-it-act-1961/20%Monthly2019-08-14 12:34
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-there-was-no-transfer-of-land-from-the-assessee-to-the-society-and-no-capital-gain-would-arise-on-the-alleged-transfer-of-land-to-the-society-on-december-7-1984/20%Monthly2018-04-13 03:49
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-petitioner-claims-that-it-is-a-charitable-society-and-is-thus-entitled-to-exemption-under-s-1023cvi-of-the-it-act-1961-hereinafter-referred-to-as-the-act/20%Monthly2019-08-20 10:48
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-the-assessment-was-not-justified-simply-because-the-warrant-of-search-was-not-in-the-single-name-of-the-assessee-but-included-the-name-of-her-husband-also/20%Monthly2019-07-17 09:46
https://taxcaselaw.com/himachal-pradesh-h-c-the-payment-of-15-million-yen-equivalent-to-rs-1813786-cannot-be-treated-as-a-royalty-under-the-provisions-of-s-9-of-the-it-act-1961-and-in-allowing-remittances-without-ded/20%Monthly2019-08-20 10:30
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-explanation-of-the-assessee-for-not-claiming-such-a-deduction-in-the-earlier-years-was-due-to-ignorance-of-law-and-in-the-asst-yr-2003-04-during-the-course-of-assessment-proceedings/20%Monthly2019-08-20 11:39