XML Sitemap

This is a XML Sitemap which is supposed to be processed by search engines which follow the XML Sitemap standard like Ask.com, Bing, Google and Yahoo.
It was generated using the WordPress content management system and the Google Sitemap Generator Plugin by Arne Brachhold.
You can find more information about XML sitemaps on sitemaps.org and Google's list of sitemap programs.

URLPriorityChange frequencyLast modified (GMT)
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-the-sum-of-rs-41790-representing-the-premium-paid-to-the-lic-securing-an-insurance-against-the-liabilities-arising-under-the-payment-of-gratuity-act-1972-was-not-hit-by-the-provisio/20%Monthly2019-07-24 11:01
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-valuation-as-adopted-by-the-assessee-should-be-accepted-which-was-not-based-on-any-comparative-sale-instances-or-any-accepted-method-of-valuation-adopted-by-ignoring-the-various-mat/20%Monthly2019-08-14 10:06
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-a-sum-of-rs-20-lakhs-received-by-the-assessee-as-non-competition-from-m-s-titan-industries-ltd-for-sale-of-its-quartz-alarm-time-piece-units-along-with-plant-and-machinery-goodw/20%Monthly2019-07-26 08:00
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-interest-tax-amount-chargeable-delayed-filing-return-section-158bfa1/20%Monthly2018-07-07 08:35
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-interest-income-of-the-assessee-clubs-received-from-its-corporate-members-on-the-investment-of-surplus-funds-as-fixed-deposits-with-them-is-not-exempted-from-tax-on-the-concept-of-m/20%Monthly2019-08-13 08:48
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-expenditure-incurred-on-the-issue-of-debentures-is-an-allowable-expenditure-under-s-37-of-the-it-act-1961-when-20-per-cent-of-the-funds-raised-through-debentures-were-to-b/20%Monthly2019-07-26 10:37
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-assessee-has-purchased-fdrs-in-a-bank-during-a-particular-assessment-year-proceedings-under-s-147-of-the-it-act-can-be-initiated-without-recording-a-specific-finding-that/20%Monthly2019-07-26 07:30
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-circumstances-of-the-case-the-tribunal-was-right-in-deletion-of-sum-of-rs-3771931-being-the-difference-in-stock-value-found/20%Monthly2019-08-20 11:35
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-assessee-was-entitled-to-claim-deduction-under-s-54f-of-the-act-on-the-income-derived-from-sale-of-shares-on-the-ground-that-the-same-had-been-invested-on-a-house-owned-by-his-wif/20%Monthly2019-08-19 13:13
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-deduction-in-respect-of-purchase-price-payable-by-the-assessee-in-respect-of-supply-of-gas-received-from-ongc-should-be-allowed-in-the-respective-years-when-such-supply-of-gas-was-receiv/20%Monthly2018-04-07 03:59
https://taxcaselaw.com/patna-h-c-the-tribunal-has-dismissed-the-appeal-preferred-by-the-appellant-and-has-affirmed-the-assessment-order-dt-30th-march-2001-annex-2-passed-by-the-learned-assessing-authority-the-dy/20%Monthly2019-08-12 08:29
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-liability-said-properly-incurred-dispute-parties-amicably-settled-finally-adjudicated-liability-question-not-statutory-liability/20%Monthly2018-07-03 05:45
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-there-is-no-allegation-that-the-transaction-is-not-at-the-market-price-and-something-over-and-above-declared-price-had-been-recovered-by-the-assessee/20%Monthly2019-07-23 11:19
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-tribunal-was-not-justified-in-concurring-with-the-findings-of-the-authorities-below-in-treating-the-genuinely-given-gifts-duly-affirmed-by-way-of-affidavits-gift-deeds-ind/20%Monthly2019-08-10 09:33
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-assessee-had-not-paid-any-interest-to-the-subscribers-of-the-chit-and-such-payment-does-not-fall-within-the-meaning-of-interest-as-defined-under-s-228a-of-the-act/20%Monthly2019-08-13 08:41
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-tribunal-is-right-in-law-in-upholding-the-order-of-the-cita-dismissing-the-evidence-found-during-the-survey-proceedings-under-s-133a-as-rough-notes-and-not-treating-t/20%Monthly2019-08-10 08:21
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-no-portion-of-the-interest-paid-by-the-assessee-on-its-borrowed-funds-can-be-disallowed-on-the-ground-that-a-portion-thereof-has-been-diverted-to-subsidiary-company/20%Monthly2019-07-17 07:50
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-cash-hand-deemed-unproductive-asset-individual-huf-sec-2ea-w-t-act/20%Monthly2018-05-26 06:46
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-penalty-section-2711c-correctly-levied-assessee-surrendered-deposit-bank-account-getting-reassessment-notice/20%Monthly2018-07-07 08:34
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-loose-sheets-not-enough-make-addition-per-estimate-assessing-officer-survey/20%Monthly2018-04-09 10:22
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-the-tribunal-was-legally-justified-in-deleting-the-addition-on-account-of-addition-of-incentive-realized-on-additional-free-sugar-sale-treating-revenue-receipt-made-by-the-ao-and-confi/20%Monthly2019-08-12 11:34
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-ao-need-afford-opportunity-hearing-relying-valuation-officer-report/20%Monthly2018-04-09 10:33
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-the-proviso-below-expln-1b-to-s-2711c-was-applicable-and-thereby-cancelling-the-penalty-of-rs-22000-imposed-under-s-2711c/20%Monthly2019-08-23 07:21
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-the-tribunal-was-legally-correct-in-confirming-the-order-of-the-cita-deleting-the-addition-of-rs-627735-on-account-of-disallowance-of-the-assessees-claim-of-bad-debts-made-by-th/20%Monthly2019-09-13 07:19
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-violation-of-the-principles-of-natural-justice-by-refusing-to-afford-any-opportunity-to-the-counsel-for-the-appellant-firm-to-produce-documentary-evidences-as-regards-issues/20%Monthly2018-04-07 03:23
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-assessee-is-entitled-to-registration-in-accordance-with-s-12a-of-the-act-as-it-is-carrying-on-activity-of-charitable-purpose-in-terms-of-s-2-15-of-the-act-without-examining-the/20%Monthly2019-07-17 10:59
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-land-belonging-to-the-assessee-is-not-covered-within-the-definition-of-urban-land-and-it-cannot-be-treated-to-be-an-asset-taxable-under-the-wt-act-even-though-the-assessee-h/20%Monthly2019-07-25 10:27
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-gross-violation-of-the-principles-of-natural-justice-by-refusing-to-afford-any-opportunity-to-the-counsel-for-the-appellant-firm-to-produce-documentary-evidences-as-regards/20%Monthly2019-05-15 07:52
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-the-ao-was-not-justified-in-disturbing-the-system-of-accounting-regularly-adopted-by-the-assessee-without-appreciating-the-fact-that-the-assessees-true-and-correct-income-could-not-b/20%Monthly2019-09-13 07:13
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-whether-the-assessment-proceedings-are-ab-initio-void-being-barred-by-the-limitation-prescribed-under-the-it-act-and-the-said-proceedings-having-been-commenced-after-the-limitation-period/20%Monthly2019-07-23 08:36
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-income-from-the-property-aggarwal-market-is-to-be-assessed-in-the-hands-of-each-of-the-co-owners-separately-and-not-in-the-hands-of-aop-2/20%Monthly2019-05-15 08:22
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-tribunal-was-right-in-law-in-deleting-the-addition-of-rs-14-30-crores-excess-depreciation-claimed-from-the-book-profits-under-section-115jb-of-the-act-even-though-it-was-claimed-by-v/20%Monthly2019-05-15 09:55
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-income-from-the-property-aggarwal-market-is-to-be-assessed-in-the-hands-of-each-of-the-co-owners-separately-and-not-in-the-hands-of-aop/20%Monthly2019-05-15 07:54
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-tribunal-was-right-in-law-in-deleting-the-addition-of-rs-14-30-crores-excess-depreciation-claimed-from-the-book-profits-under-section-115jb-of-the-act-even-though-it-was-claimed-by/20%Monthly2019-01-21 06:57
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-amount-received-as-advance-money-towards-sale-price-of-land-was-not-be-considered-as-assessees-income-till-the-sale-was-complete-and-title-passed-to-the-buyers-unde/20%Monthly2019-08-10 07:44
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-the-tribunal-was-justified-in-refusing-to-condone-the-delay-and-rejecting-the-delay-as-barred-by-limitation/20%Monthly2019-07-22 12:14
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-the-tribunal-is-right-in-holding-that-penalty-proceedings-under-s-2711c-of-the-it-act-1961-had-been-validly-ini/20%Monthly2019-08-05 12:32
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-provisions-of-s-104-of-the-it-act-were-applicable-even-to-a-company-which-had-not-declared-any-dividend/20%Monthly2019-07-27 11:13
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-applications-made-by-the-ajmera-group-of-firms-and-their-partners-under-s-245c-of-the-it-act-for-settlement-of-the-tax-liability-for-the-asst-yrs-1989-90-to-1993-94/20%Monthly2019-08-03 10:43
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-the-tribunal-was-right-in-law-in-cancelling-the-order-passed-under-s-263-of-the-it-act-by-the-cit/20%Monthly2019-09-12 08:50
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-share-application-money-received-assessee-company-alleged-bogus-shareholdersamount-cannot-regarded-undisclosed-income-recipient-assessee-company/20%Monthly2018-04-09 10:24
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-tribunal-was-right-in-law-in-cancelling-the-order-passed-under-s-263-of-the-it-act-by-the-cit/20%Monthly2019-09-13 06:58
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-penalty-based-facts-found-survey-us-133a-can-not-set-aside-cita-without-going-merit-case/20%Monthly2018-07-07 08:32
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-no-valid-service-notice-section-1432-due-date-even-though-assessing-officer-issued-notice-section-1432-1113-11-1997-vide/20%Monthly2018-06-01 08:14
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-the-honble-tribunal-was-justified-in-upholding-the-order-of-the-cita-deleting-the-addition-made-by-the-ao-on-account-of-difference-between-the-cost-of-construction-estimated-by-t/20%Monthly2019-09-12 11:51
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-whether-the-colorable-device-adopted-by-the-assessee-in-admitting-two-new-partners-namely-sri-m-venkataramaiah-and-smt-sujatha-venkataramaiah-and-permitting-all-the-old-partners-to/20%Monthly2019-08-14 07:01
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-circumstances-of-the-case-the-tribunal-was-right-in-holding-that-the-penalty-under-s-2711c-cannot-be-levied/20%Monthly2019-08-19 06:17
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-and-haryana-h-c-the-honble-tribunal-was-legally-right-in-upholding-the-decision-of-the-learned-cita-based-on-the-honble-gujarat-high-court-judgment-in-the-case-of-cit-vs/20%Monthly2019-07-27 11:20
https://taxcaselaw.com/gauhati-h-c-the-learned-tribunal-by-the-aforesaid-order-had-set-aside-the-order-of-the-learned-cita-affirming-an-order-of-penalty-passed-by-the-ao-under-s-2711c/20%Monthly2019-08-10 11:48
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-income-chargeable-to-tax-has-escaped-assessment-within-the-meaning-of-s-147/20%Monthly2019-08-19 12:20