XML Sitemap

This is a XML Sitemap which is supposed to be processed by search engines which follow the XML Sitemap standard like Ask.com, Bing, Google and Yahoo.
It was generated using the WordPress content management system and the Google Sitemap Generator Plugin by Arne Brachhold.
You can find more information about XML sitemaps on sitemaps.org and Google's list of sitemap programs.

URLPriorityChange frequencyLast modified (GMT)
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-income-sale-shade-trees-not-agriculture-income-therefore-not-exempt/20%Monthly2018-07-07 08:31
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-notices-were-issued-to-the-respondent-assessee-under-section-148/20%Monthly2019-09-12 11:19
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-deduction-under-s-80hhc-was-allowable-on-the-basis-of-book-profits-and-not-on-the-basis-of-eligible-profits-under-s-80hhc-as-per-computation-under-the-normal-provisions-of-the-it-act/20%Monthly2019-09-28 10:38
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-appellant-was-entitled-to-depreciation-on-the-assets-acquired-from-m-s-western-india-match-company-ltd-wimco-based-on-the-value-placed-in-the-surveyors-report-and-not-on-the-actual/20%Monthly2019-10-25 06:21
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-the-tribunal-was-right-in-law-in-holding-that-the-receipts-from-the-sale-of-levy-free-sugar-is-capital-receipt-and-not-taxable/20%Monthly2019-11-27 07:52
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-tribunal-was-right-in-treating-the-appeal-filed-by-the-assessee-company-to-the-cita-as-maintainable-and-valid-in-law-when-the-official-liquidator-was-appointed-and-had-taken-charge/20%Monthly2019-11-28 12:39
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-mat-credit-is-to-be-set-off-from-the-tax-payable-before-levying-interest-under-ss-234b-and-234c-of-the-it-act-1961-whether-on-the-facts-and-circumstances-of-the-case-the-mat-credi/20%Monthly2019-08-23 08:16
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-a-decision-contrary-to-law-can-be-rectified-under-s-154/20%Monthly2019-08-12 07:16
https://taxcaselaw.com/uttarakhand-h-c-mobilization-demobilization-charges-in-respect-of-voyage-conducted-in-indian-territorial-waters-only-are-to-be-included-in-the-gross-revenue-and-the-remaining-amount-of-such-charges/20%Monthly2019-01-08 10:17
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-whether-the-tribunal-is-justified-in-sustaining-the-addition-of-rs-3-17-crores-as-undisclosed-income-in-the-hands-of-the-appellant/20%Monthly2019-10-25 10:06
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-tax-effect-was-less-than-the-monetary-limit-prescribed-in-the-boards-circular-dt-27th-march-2000-without-considering-the-fact-that-it-was-only-an-internal-instruction-and-was-not/20%Monthly2019-10-25 07:44
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-circumstances-of-the-case-the-tribunal-was-right-in-remitting-the-matter-to-the-ao-to-await-the-outcome-of-the-writ-petition-without-deciding-whether-the-delay/20%Monthly2019-12-06 13:01
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-filed-returns-voluntarily-and-also-co-operated-with-the-it-department-in-completing-the-assessment-and-paid-the-tax-due-and-also-made-part-payment-of-the-interest-levied-under-ss-234a-2/20%Monthly2020-01-10 11:09
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-whether-the-tribunal-misdirected-itself-in-law-in-upholding-as-valid-the-initiation-of-reassessment-proceedings-and-the-consequent-assessment-order-dt-26th-march-1999-passed-by-the-ao-in/20%Monthly2019-09-28 07:03
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-provisions-of-s-115jaa-and-ss-234b-and-234c-of-the-act-concluded-that-the-mat-credit-shall-be-set-off-before-charging-interest-under-ss-234b-and-234c-of-the-it-act-1961-is-valid/20%Monthly2019-08-12 05:55
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-tribunal-was-right-in-allowing-deduction-under-s-80hhc-on-the-basis-of-book-profits-under-s-115ja-and-not-on-the-basis-of-eligible-profits-under-s-80hhc-as-per-normal-computation/20%Monthly2019-08-13 10:23
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-appellant-is-not-entitled-to-deduction-of-the-provision-made-in-respect-of-non-performing-assets-which-are-considered-irrecoverable/20%Monthly2019-05-18 09:34
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-no-deduction-provision-made-respect-non-performing-assets-considered-irrecoverable/20%Monthly2018-07-06 08:35
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-expenditure-for-earning-dividend-income-cannot-be-estimated-and-therefore-cannot-be-allowed-while-computing-book-profits-and-also-under-the-normal-provisions-of-the-income-tax-act/20%Monthly2018-12-17 06:25
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-circumstances-of-the-case-the-tribunal-was-right-in-confirming-the-cit-as-order-when-the-cita-has-failed-to-estimate-the-agricultural-income-of-the-assesse/20%Monthly2019-08-14 12:06
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-the-tribunal-was-right-in-holding-that-the-beneficiary-of-each-of-the-trusts-is-not-indeterminate-and-uncertain/20%Monthly2020-01-07 05:58
https://taxcaselaw.com/orissa-h-c-no-disallowance-us-43b-epf-contribution-deposited-due-date-filing-tax-return-us-1391/20%Monthly2018-05-26 07:49
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-order-of-cita-has-been-accepted-by-the-assessee-proceedings-for-penalty-under-s-2711c-were-initiated/20%Monthly2019-10-24 11:48
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-deduction-under-s-80hhc-of-the-act-is-a-case-of-mat-assessment-is-to-be-worked-out-on-the-basis-of-the-profit-computed-under-the-regular-provision-of-law-applicable-to-the-computatio/20%Monthly2019-10-03 11:01
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-money-attached-from-the-bank-account-of-m-s-molly-trading-co-p-ltd-cannot-be-termed-as-wrong-and-hence-the-amount-cannot-be-refunded/20%Monthly2019-10-26 09:27
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-impugned-assessment-framed-under-s-158bc-of-it-act-by-the-ao-is-barred-by-limitation-within-the-meaning-of-the-provisions-contained-in-s-158be-r-w-s-1422a/20%Monthly2020-01-08 07:52
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-tribunal-is-right-in-upholding-the-order-of-the-assessment-when-in-fact-the-learned-ao-could-not-have-had-any-reason-to-believe-that-the-income-had-escaped-assessment/20%Monthly2019-10-03 11:36
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-it-is-not-proper-for-the-appellate-authority-to-sit-tight-over-the-stay-application-but-he-is-obliged-to-pass-order-in-accordance-with-law-within-a-reasonable-time-failing-which-a-mand/20%Monthly2019-12-10 10:50
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-appellant-is-not-entitled-to-deduction-under-s-80hhc-without-giving-an-opportunity-to-the-appellant/20%Monthly2019-07-30 12:32
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-notice-under-s-148-of-the-act-cannot-be-issued-for-making-an-assessment-under-s-147-of-the-act-when-time-limit-is-available-for-issue-of-notice-under-s-1432-of-the-act-for-making-an/20%Monthly2019-10-24 08:03
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-the-tribunal-is-justified-in-law-in-cancelling-the-order-of-the-cit-under-s-263-of-the-it-act-is-valid/20%Monthly2019-08-12 05:58
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-surtax-payable-pursuant-to-the-companies-profits-surtax-act-1964-was-not-an-admissible-deduction-in-computing-the-total-income-for-the-year-under-reference/20%Monthly2020-01-10 10:01
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-whether-the-appellate-authorities-were-correct-in-holding-that-for-the-purpose-of-writing-off-of-bad-debts-it-was-not-essential-to-square-off-each-individual-account-of-every-debtor-an/20%Monthly2019-10-25 11:16
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-the-officer-has-no-jurisdiction-to-make-the-assessment/20%Monthly2019-08-14 07:56
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-the-assessee-would-not-have-included-the-undisclosed-income-in-the-return-for-regular-assessment-is-perverse-in-as-much-as-the-assessee-has-itself-admitted-that-such-undisclosed-income-h/20%Monthly2019-08-14 10:41
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-only-objective-of-trim-is-to-coordinate-the-marketing-activities-of-the-brand-including-the-mutual-benefit-of-the-franchisees-including-the-franchisee-it-is-envisaged-that-no-profits/20%Monthly2019-08-05 09:31