XML Sitemap

This is a XML Sitemap which is supposed to be processed by search engines which follow the XML Sitemap standard like Ask.com, Bing, Google and Yahoo.
It was generated using the WordPress content management system and the Google Sitemap Generator Plugin by Arne Brachhold.
You can find more information about XML sitemaps on sitemaps.org and Google's list of sitemap programs.

URLPriorityChange frequencyLast modified (GMT)
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-corporate-membership-itself-meant-it-was-for-the-benefit-of-the-assessee-and-not-for-any-particular-employee-as-it-had-a-right-to-nominate-and-substitute-an-employee-at-any-point-of-time/20%Monthly2019-07-27 12:07
https://taxcaselaw.com/rajasthan-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-the-tribunal-was-justified-in-law-in-upholding-the-order-of-the-cita-reducing-the-disallowance-of-rs-1540667-made-by-the/20%Monthly2019-11-27 11:19
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-deletion-of-rs-71-lakhs-received-by-the-assessee-on-account-of-share-application-money-by-the-commissioner-of-income-tax-appeals-which-has-been-sustained-by-the-tribunal/20%Monthly2019-01-11 08:08
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-honble-tribunal-erred-in-confirming-the-order-of-cita-and-allowing-the-depreciation-to-the-assessee-50-per-cent-and-40-per-cent-respectively-for-asst-yrs-1991-92-and-19/20%Monthly2019-11-27 11:42
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-whether-the-addition-of-rs-20-lacs-as-an-income-tax-advance-said-to-have-been-made-by-the-assessee-to-mr-bhupendra-chedda-is-based-on-legal-evidence/20%Monthly2020-01-07 07:24
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-whether-in-view-of-facts-and-circumstances-of-the-case-the-honble-tribunal-is-justified-in-allowing-the-interest-on-the-borrowed-fund-under-s-361iii-of-the-it-act-1961-when-the-s/20%Monthly2019-12-10 10:37
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-the-deduction-on-account-of-debt-owed-for-the-purpose-of-determining-the-net-wealth-as-claimed-by-the-assessee-should-be-reduced/20%Monthly2019-08-23 05:59
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-they-are-central-government-employees-working-on-deemed-deputation-to-bsnl/20%Monthly2019-11-27 11:01
https://taxcaselaw.com/calcutta-h-c-assessee-engaged-business-leasing-commercial-vehicles-entitled-depreciation-higher-rate-40-per-cent-provided-item-iii2ii-appen/20%Monthly2018-04-09 12:47
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-honble-tribunal-has-erred-in-deleting-the-penalty-observing-that-as-the-assessee-had-not-filed-return-of-income-on-the-ground-that-assessee-had-concealed-or-furnished-inaccur/20%Monthly2019-10-24 12:00
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-misappreciation-of-the-prior-findings-of-the-same-points-and-of-facts-and-law-involved-in-the-case-and-liable-to-be-set-aside/20%Monthly2019-05-15 10:13
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-tribunal-no-express-power-review-earlier-order/20%Monthly2018-07-03 06:03
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-assessee-had-sought-deduction-of-rs-16083071-under-s-361-vii-of-the-it-act-1961-the-act-for-short-being-the-amount-of-bad-debt-which-is-written-off-as-ir/20%Monthly2019-11-28 10:56
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-circumstances-of-the-case-the-tribunal-was-correct-in-holding-that-the-write-off-of-rs-458500-being-part-of-the-loan-advanced-by-the-assessee-to-its-fully-o/20%Monthly2019-12-10 12:18
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-jt-director-investigation-not-empowered-issue-search-authorisation/20%Monthly2018-05-30 08:20
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-circumstances-of-the-case-income-tax-refund-of-rs-1369092-payable-to-the-deceased-was-includible-in-the-estate-of-the-deceased-though-it-was-received-after/20%Monthly2019-10-25 12:11
https://taxcaselaw.com/without-prejudice-to-the-above-whether-the-tribunal-was-justified-in-confirming-the-order-of-the-cwta-on-the-above-issue-in-spite-of-the-fact-that-these-rights-were-assigned-to-the-third-parties-b/20%Monthly2019-08-14 11:58
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-penalty-imposed-by-the-assessing-officer-under-section-271c-of-the-income-tax-act-1961-on-the-ground-that-the-penalty-order-dated-16-3-2000-was-passed-beyond-the-time-prescribed-by/20%Monthly2019-05-18 10:54
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-whether-manner-in-which-expression-joint-director-has-been-used-in-section-1321-requires-same-to-be-interpreted-in-its-limited-sense-as-meaning-only-a-joint-director-an/20%Monthly2019-05-15 10:01
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-jt-director-is-not-empowered-to-issue-any-authorization-for-search/20%Monthly2019-05-15 10:42
https://taxcaselaw.com/calcutta-h-c-the-appellant-was-not-entitled-to-depreciation-of-rs-4371472-and-the-investment-allowance-of-rs-2701145-on-the-increased-cost-of-the-plant-and-machinery-resulting-from-increase-in/20%Monthly2019-09-29 10:06
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-additional-director-investigation-no-jurisdiction-issue-warrant-authorization/20%Monthly2018-07-03 06:06
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-we-will-dispose-of-the-above-referred-11-notice-of-motions-taken-out-by-the-cit-mumbai-for-condonation-of-delay-in-filing-interest-tax-appeal-no-10-of-2007-and-income-tax-appeals-being/20%Monthly2019-12-06 11:56
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-revised-rates-of-depreciation-as-per-the-income-tax-fourth-amendment-rules-1983-inserted-w-e-f-2nd-april-1983-will-not-be-applicable-for-asst-yr-1980-81/20%Monthly2019-11-27 11:37
https://taxcaselaw.com/madhya-pradesh-h-c-whether-the-tribunal-was-justified-in-confirming-the-penalty-under-s-2711c-of-the-it-act-when-under-s-69a-the-cash-of-rs-135000-found-on-9th-july-1982-is-not-assessable/20%Monthly2019-08-14 08:01
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-addition-was-made-only-based-on-the-admission-of-the-assessee-at-the-time-of-search-which-had-been-retracted-and-that-the-ao-as-well-as-cita-had-ignored-the-contention-of-the-assess/20%Monthly2019-11-28 10:51
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-land-acquired-from-the-ownership-of-the-appellant-was-not-agricultural-land-is-perverse/20%Monthly2019-01-11 08:07
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-whether-on-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-the-tribunal-was-justified-in-law-in-deleting-the-additions-in-respect-of-sales-tax-refund-to-the-extent-of-rs-900813/20%Monthly2019-09-28 10:44