XML Sitemap

This is a XML Sitemap which is supposed to be processed by search engines which follow the XML Sitemap standard like Ask.com, Bing, Google and Yahoo.
It was generated using the WordPress content management system and the Google Sitemap Generator Plugin by Arne Brachhold.
You can find more information about XML sitemaps on sitemaps.org and Google's list of sitemap programs.

URLPriorityChange frequencyLast modified (GMT)
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-expression-dy-director-who-is-admittedly-competent-to-issue-a-warrant-of-authorization-includes-an-addl-director-in-terms-of-the-notification-no-so-3862-dt-6th-nov-1979-issu/20%Monthly2019-08-23 12:02
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-the-interest-earned-by-the-assessee-before-the-commencement-of-the-business-from-the-funds-mobilised-through-share-capital-b/20%Monthly2019-09-13 11:16
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-the-tribunal-has-cancelled-the-intimation-issued-under-s-1431a-including-the-demand-of-additional-tax-under-s-1431a-of-the-it-act/20%Monthly2019-11-27 10:16
https://taxcaselaw.com/rajasthan-h-c-whether-in-the-facts-and-circumstances-when-the-books-of-account-maintained-by-the-assessee-were-rejected-under-s-145-and-the-assessment-was-made-by-the-ao-to-the-best-of-his-judgmen/20%Monthly2019-10-26 09:47
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-the-tribunal-was-right-in-applying-the-decision-of-the-punjab-haryana-high-court-in-cineramas-vs-cit-1977-ctr-ph/20%Monthly2020-02-01 07:30
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-a-search-and-seizure-was-conducted-by-the-respondents-in-the-premises-of-the-appellants-pursuant-to-warrants-of-authorization-dt-3rd-aug-2005/20%Monthly2020-01-29 09:53
https://taxcaselaw.com/madhya-pradesh-h-c-whether-the-learned-member-tribunal-was-right-and-justified-in-proceeding-ex-parte-against-the-appellant-despite-the-prayer-of-the-appellants-counsel-to-adjourn-the-case/20%Monthly2020-01-30 07:41
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-amount-of-rs-806147-incurred-by-the-assessee-for-replacing-the-old-mono-sound-system-with-a-new-stereo-system-viz-dolby-system-should-be-treated-as-a-revenue-expenditure-and-n/20%Monthly2019-09-13 11:34
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-whether-the-assessee-is-entitled-to-reduce-the-interest-paid-by-it-on-a-loan-taken-by-it-from-the-bank-of-rajasthan-by-adjusting-the-interest-received-by-it-on-fixed-deposits-which-were-p/20%Monthly2020-01-30 09:44
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-jurisdiction-to-make-assessment-in-respect-of-matters-arising-at-bombay-had-not-been-conferred-or-transferred-to-delhi-by-reference-to-territory-or-persons-or-classes-of-per/20%Monthly2019-07-25 12:19
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-parting-of-part-of-the-profit-by-the-assessee-to-m-s-mysore-amalgamated-coffee-estates-p-ltd-amounts-to-a-colourable-device-adopted-by-the-assessee-to-avoid-tax/20%Monthly2019-11-28 10:42
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-in-these-cases-appellants-have-challenged-the-validity-of-r-3-of-the-it-rules-1962-as-amended-by-the-it-twenty-second-amendment-rules-2001-hereinafter-referred-to-as-the-rules-which/20%Monthly2019-09-28 07:42
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-respondent-assessee-had-filed-return-of-income-showing-an-income-of-rs-46096960-and-was-assessed-under-s-115jb-of-the-act/20%Monthly2019-11-28 07:35
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-a-three-judge-bench-of-this-court-did-not-strike-down-r-3-of-the-rules-but-read-down-the-rule-to-make-it-in-line-with-s-172ii/20%Monthly2019-09-28 06:58
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-whether-the-tribunal-is-right-in-law-and-on-facts-in-deleting-the-addition-of-rs-18593546-holding-that-the-amount-in-question-represented-capital-gains-and-the-said-capital-gains-was/20%Monthly2020-01-08 09:46
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-whether-a-flat-in-a-tenant-co-operative-housing-society-which-is-transferred-to-the-name-of-an-assessee-on-17th-april-1993-and-which-comes-to-the-legal-ownership-of-the-assessee-only-on/20%Monthly2019-07-30 08:45
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-the-appellant-assessee-an-opportunity-of-being-heard-and-also-giving-the-appellant-assessee-an-opportunity-of-filing-any-evidence-in-support-of-its-claim-that-there-was-no-discrepancy-in-its-acc/20%Monthly2020-01-29 07:06
https://taxcaselaw.com/madhya-pradesh-h-c-whether-in-the-facts-and-circumstances-of-the-case-the-tribunal-is-justified-in-holding-the-decision-of-the-cita-in-deleting-the-addition-of-rs-68000-on-the-foundation-that-in-2/20%Monthly2020-01-30 12:57
https://taxcaselaw.com/madhya-pradesh-h-c-whether-in-the-facts-and-circumstances-of-the-case-the-tribunal-is-justified-in-holding-the-decision-of-the-cita-in-deleting-the-addition-of-rs-68000-on-the-foundation-that-in/20%Monthly2020-01-30 12:52
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-honble-tribunal-was-justified-in-deleting-the-addition-of-rs-197290-on-account-of-interest-and-rs-980000-on-account-of-upfront-fees-by-ignoring-expln-8-to-s/20%Monthly2020-01-30 12:36
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-the-tribunal-is-right-in-law-and-on-facts-in-confirming-the-order-of-the-cita-confirming-only-unaccounted-sales-to-the-tune-of-rs-432848-and-thereby-deleting-the-remaining-amount-of/20%Monthly2019-07-27 11:35
https://taxcaselaw.com/rajasthan-h-c-the-learned-tribunal-was-justified-in-deleting-the-addition-of-rs-1735958-on-account-of-income-from-lease-rent-made-by-the-ao-and-as-upheld-by-the-learned-cita-specially-when-the/20%Monthly2019-10-01 10:34
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-tribunal-was-right-in-law-in-holding-that-the-rental-income-received-by-the-appellant-firm-was-liable-to-be-taxed-in-its-hands-without-invoking-the-provisions-of-s-26-of-the-act-e/20%Monthly2019-09-30 12:25
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-rental-income-received-by-the-appellant-firm-was-liable-to-be-taxed-in-its-hands-without-invoking-the-provisions-of-s-26-of-the-act-especially-when-the-shares-of-each-of-the-partn/20%Monthly2019-10-01 05:54
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-the-order-passed-by-the-cita-deleting-the-disallowance-of-interest-which-was-made-by-the-ao-under-s-361iii-on-the-ground-that-the-purchase-of-shares-was-mainly-for-acquiring-contr/20%Monthly2019-08-12 11:43
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-the-tribunal-was-justified-in-law-in-holding-that-childrens-education-allowance-paid-by-the-assessee-to-their-employees/20%Monthly2020-01-31 08:28
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-cash-payment-of-rs-3717798-made-by-the-assessee-did-not-attract-the-provisions-of-s-40a3-of-the-act-and-therefore-no-explanation-under-r-6dd-of-the-rules-was-required-to-be/20%Monthly2019-10-24 07:54
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-whether-the-tribunal-was-right-in-law-and-on-facts-in-rejecting-the-miscellaneous-application-which-was-preferred-by-the-revenue-on-the-ground-that-no-approval-under-s-1015ivc-of/20%Monthly2019-08-05 11:17
https://taxcaselaw.com/orissa-h-c-the-petitioner-in-this-writ-application-seeks-to-challenge-an-order-dt-14th-march-1995-passed-under-s-154-of-the-it-act-1961-by-the-asstt-cit-cuttack-circle-for-the-asst-yr-1991/20%Monthly2020-01-30 10:04
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-revisional-authority-cannot-exercise-its-jurisdiction-as-the-assessment-order-is-not-erroneous-despite-the-assessment-order-being-prejudicial-to-the-interests-of-the-revenue/20%Monthly2019-10-26 10:50
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-whether-the-assessee-employer-is-bound-to-collect-and-verify-the-date-of-journey-place-of-journey-destination-of-journey-proof-of-having-performed-the-journey-mode-of-journey-and-a/20%Monthly2019-09-30 08:13
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-whether-the-ao-had-erred-in-imposing-surcharge-at-17-per-cent-on-the-tax-amount-of-rs-97456-under-s-113-of-the-it-act-1961-1961-act-for-the-block-period-comprising-of-pre/20%Monthly2020-01-27 09:37
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-the-perquisite-value-was-the-difference-between-the-market-value-and-the-price-paid-by-the-employees-for-exercise-of-the-option/20%Monthly2020-01-27 08:03
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-reimbursement-of-club-membership-fees-and-allowance-on-furnishing-etc-provided-by-the-assessee-company-to-their-executives-are-not-perquisites-under-s-172-of-the-act/20%Monthly2019-09-13 11:23
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-export-subsidy-chargeable-interest/20%Monthly2018-03-30 11:42
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-the-reopening-of-assessments-made-by-the-ao-was-without-jurisdiction-as-it-was-on-account-of-mere-change-of-opinion-when-admittedly-during-the-course-of-assessment-of-m-s-manikya-plas/20%Monthly2020-01-08 09:35