XML Sitemap

This is a XML Sitemap which is supposed to be processed by search engines which follow the XML Sitemap standard like Ask.com, Bing, Google and Yahoo.
It was generated using the WordPress content management system and the Google Sitemap Generator Plugin by Arne Brachhold.
You can find more information about XML sitemaps on sitemaps.org and Google's list of sitemap programs.

URLPriorityChange frequencyLast modified (GMT)
https://taxcaselaw.com/uttarakhand-h-c-the-ao-as-well-as-cita-were-right-in-adding-the-amount-of-rs-9904000-for-the-asst-yr-1986-87-and-amount-worth-rs-6464530-for-the-asst-yr-1987-88-received-by-the-assessee/20%Monthly2020-01-31 06:11
https://taxcaselaw.com/rajasthan-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-the-tribunal-was-justified-in-law-in-altogether-ignoring-the-circumstantial-evidence-and-deleting-the-addition-of-rs-155000/20%Monthly2020-01-30 11:43
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-whether-the-assessee-had-incurred-a-capital-expenditure-of-rs-8722447-on-purchase-of-axial-machine-along-with-machinery-spares-and-computers-which-was-claimed-as-a-research-and-developm/20%Monthly2020-01-29 06:49
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-no-interest-u-s-217-was-chargeable-in-this-case-despite-the-fact-that-the-assessee-company-did-not-file-statement-of-income-estimate-of-income-as-required-under-s-209a-of-the-it-act-for-t/20%Monthly2020-01-29 11:34
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-tribunal-did-not-set-aside-or-cancel-the-original-assessment-and-therefore-the-time-limit-prescribed-under-s-1532a/20%Monthly2020-01-15 08:36
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-the-petitioner-company-filed-it-return-showing-loss-of-rs-219169-inclusive-therewith-audited-pl-a-c-and-balance-sheet-for-asst-yr-1984-85/20%Monthly2020-01-31 08:42
https://taxcaselaw.com/uttarakhand-h-c-whether-the-service-rendered-by-inspecting-the-three-units-of-control-system-of-rr-avon-gas-generator-driven-process-gas-compressor-used-in-connection-with-the-production-of-oil-at-s/20%Monthly2018-08-03 12:04
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-circumstances-of-the-case-the-tribunal-was-legally-correct-in-holding-that-the-expenditure-by-the-assessee-on-replacement-on-one-turbine-rotor-amounting-to-rs/20%Monthly2020-01-30 11:38
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-it-is-based-on-surmises-that-the-decoders-are-given-free-of-charge-to-the-cable-operators/20%Monthly2020-01-29 05:49
https://taxcaselaw.com/madhya-pradesh-h-c-the-assessee-was-entitled-to-claim-depreciation-on-the-machine-tetrapack-and-claimed-deduction-amounting-to-rs-2887651-when-even-according-to-the-assessee-the-said-machine-was/20%Monthly2019-09-30 08:06
https://taxcaselaw.com/jharkhand-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-circumstances-of-the-case-and-in-law-the-learned-tribunal-was-justified-in-deleting-the-addition-made-under-the-head-income-from-house-property/20%Monthly2020-01-30 08:32
https://taxcaselaw.com/jharkhand-h-c-the-assessee-to-receive-the-loans-and-deposits-in-cash-and-not-by-the-account-payee-cheque-or-account-payee-bank-draft-as-required-under-s-269ss-and-as-such-the-penalty-levied-under/20%Monthly2020-01-13 06:47
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-borrowed-funds-have-been-diverted-for-non-business-purposes/20%Monthly2020-01-11 13:05
https://taxcaselaw.com/madhya-pradesh-h-c-deduction-claimed-by-the-assessee-towards-unpaid-liability-of-sales-tax-at-rs-49697-were-allowable-deduction-under-s-43b/20%Monthly2019-07-27 10:32
https://taxcaselaw.com/karnataka-h-c-no-penalty-under-s-2711c-of-the-act-can-be-levied-when-the-total-income-of-the-assessees-is-determined-in-assessment-proceedings-on-estimate-basis/20%Monthly2019-12-07 05:53
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-whether-or-not-when-the-returns-and-the-statements-of-the-seller-admit-higher-sale-consideration-actually-received-the-revenue-is-justified-in-fixing-the-sale-consideration-at-the-higher-amount/20%Monthly2020-02-04 10:30
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-commission-paid-to-sh-vijay-kumar-aggarwal-a-close-relative-of-managing-director-was-right-as-he-was-rendering-service-in-lieu-of-commission-paid/20%Monthly2020-01-15 07:41
https://taxcaselaw.com/madhya-pradesh-h-c-whether-the-tribunal-was-justified-in-entertaining-and-eventually-allowing-the-application-made-by-the-assessee-under-s-254-of-the-it-act/20%Monthly2019-10-25 06:41
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-the-tribunal-was-right-in-law-in-allowing-relief-in-respect-of-sales-tax-payable-which-amount-was-paid-subsequent-to-the-close-of-the-accounting-year-and-not-before-the-close-of-the-ac/20%Monthly2019-07-27 11:29
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-hether-on-the-facts-and-circumstances-of-the-case-the-tribunal-was-justified-in-entertaining-the-additional-ground-raised-by-the-assessee-on-an-issue-which-had-not-been-disputed-earlier-before/20%Monthly2020-02-04 11:04
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-power-commissioner-section-263-insertion-explanation-section-2631/20%Monthly2018-05-30 08:22
https://taxcaselaw.com/rajasthan-h-c-the-tractor-trailers-would-not-fall-within-the-meaning-of-road-transport-vehicles-and-that-assessee-is-entitled-to-claim-investment-allowance/20%Monthly2020-01-31 12:21
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-commissioner-had-no-jurisdiction-under-section-263-to-revise-the-order-made-by-the-iac-asstt-taking-into-consideration-that-both-the-orders-that-is-of-the-iac-and-of-the-commissione/20%Monthly2019-05-15 10:47
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-whether-the-revenue-could-have-imposed-a-penalty-on-the-assessee-under-the-provisions-of-s-221-of-the-it-act1961-the-act-even-though-two-applications-filed-by-the-ass/20%Monthly2020-01-27 09:54
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-the-reduction-of-90-per-cent-of-the-receipts-from-interest-should-be-taken-into-account-after-adjustment-of-expenses-for-the-purpose-of-computing-the-profits-of-the-business-under-s-80hh/20%Monthly2019-11-27 12:19
https://taxcaselaw.com/jharkhand-h-c-the-abandonment-of-rs-199211-which-is-the-share-of-the-investment-allowance-reserve-by-the-assessee-in-favour-of-the-firm-i-e-m-s-kapoor-brothers-is-not-a-deemed-gift-under-s-4/20%Monthly2020-01-31 08:32
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-circumstances-of-the-case-the-burden-cast-on-the-assessee-by-expln-1b-to-s-2711c-stands-discharged-by-the-assessee-providing-basic-information-without-su/20%Monthly2020-01-15 06:33
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-the-tribunal-was-justified-in-law-in-holding-that-the-disputed-liability-of-rs-50761-was-not-allowable-as-deduction-in-the-ass/20%Monthly2020-01-29 11:16