XML Sitemap

This is a XML Sitemap which is supposed to be processed by search engines which follow the XML Sitemap standard like Ask.com, Bing, Google and Yahoo.
It was generated using the WordPress content management system and the Google Sitemap Generator Plugin by Arne Brachhold.
You can find more information about XML sitemaps on sitemaps.org and Google's list of sitemap programs.

URLPriorityChange frequencyLast modified (GMT)
https://taxcaselaw.com/aar-whether-in-respect-of-the-transaction-being-the-reorganization-described-in-annex-2-of-this-application-the-applicant-is-chargeable-to-tax-in-india-under-the-provisions-of-the-it-act-1961/20%Monthly2020-03-04 10:42
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-the-gifts-received-by-the-applicant-were-not-genuine-and-further-that-they-fall-under-s-68-of-the-it-act-and-were-thus-correctly-added-to-the-income-of-the-assessee/20%Monthly2020-03-12 08:15
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-whether-the-tribunal-was-right-in-deleting-the-penalty-imposed-under-s-2711c-of-the-it-act-1961-on-the-ground-that-the-total-income-of-the-assessee-has-been-assessed-at-a-minus-figu/20%Monthly2020-03-21 08:09
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-the-tribunal-is-right-in-law-in-valuing-the-property-on-the-basis-of-gross-maintainable-rent-taken-at-rs-7000-per-month-in-ac/20%Monthly2020-03-07 12:35
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-they-are-entitled-to-claim-relief-under-s-89-of-the-it-act-apportioning-the-arrears-of-salary-compulsorily-credited-to-gpf-account-to-various-previous-years-to-which-it-relates-and-to-av/20%Monthly2020-03-06 10:28
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-whether-the-tribunal-was-right-in-upholding-the-order-of-the-cita-disallowing-extra-shift-allowance-and-additional-depreciation-on-the-assets-leased-out-by-the-assessee/20%Monthly2020-03-05 07:50
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-whether-in-the-facts-and-circumstances-of-the-case-the-tribunal-was-justified-in-allowing-the-claim-of-deduction-of-rs-1378569-and-rs-398412-being-expenditure-incurred-on-scien/20%Monthly2020-03-19 06:45
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-where-an-order-has-been-made-under-sub-s-1-in-favour-of-any-person-whether-such-order-relates-to-one-or-more-assessment-years-he-shall-not-be-entitled-to-any-relief-under-this-sectio/20%Monthly2020-03-06 12:08
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-the-tribunal-was-right-in-holding-that-the-assessee-is-entitled-to-exemption-under-s-11-of-the-it-act-1961/20%Monthly2020-03-12 08:19
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-reserve-for-bad-and-doubtful-debts-fell-within-the-permissible-adjustments-prescribed-by-r-5a-of-the-first-schedule-to-the-act/20%Monthly2020-03-02 07:11
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-the-sum-of-rs-95000-is-liable-to-be-taxed-in-accordance-with-the-provisions-of-s-173i-r-w-s-171iv-of-the-act-for-the/20%Monthly2020-03-18 14:44
https://taxcaselaw.com/calcutta-h-c-the-learned-counsel-for-the-respondent-took-a-novel-point-that-s-5-of-the-limitation-act-has-no-manner-of-application-in-an-appeal-under-s-260a/20%Monthly2020-03-05 10:33
https://taxcaselaw.com/rajasthan-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-and-in-law-the-tribunal-was-justified-in-holding-that-the-order-passed-by-the-cit-under-s-263-was-correct-and-thereby-uphol/20%Monthly2020-03-17 11:33
https://taxcaselaw.com/uttaranchal-h-c-whether-the-learned-tribunal-has-erred-in-law-in-holding-that-the-appellants-have-failed-to-satisfy-the-condition-that-the-remuneration-is-not-deductible-in-computing-the-pr/20%Monthly2020-03-05 10:21
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-period-for-completion-of-the-assessment-proceedings-on-the-basis-of-the-first-notice-issued-to-the-assessee-on-26th-march-1999-had-expired-on-the-date-the-second-notice-dt-29th-ma/20%Monthly2020-03-22 09:37
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-the-cita-expressly-or-impliedly-applied-his-mind-on-the-issue-of-the-allowance-of-relief-under-s-35b-on-reassortment-charges-when-the-claim-for-deduction-on-this-account-had-already-be/20%Monthly2020-03-19 06:33
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-whether-in-the-facts-and-circumstances-of-the-case-the-tribunal-was-right-in-holding-that-reopening-of-the-assessment-under-s-147a-of-the-it-act-1961-could-not-be-reagitated-after/20%Monthly2020-03-18 17:11
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-the-tribunal-was-right-in-placing-reliance-upon-the-statements-of-karkhanadars-in-a-situation-when-the-assessee-had-not-been/20%Monthly2020-01-24 12:45
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-whether-the-tribunal-is-right-in-law-and-on-fact-in-deleting-the-penalty-levied-under-s-2711c-on-the-ground-that-there-cannot-be-any-question-of-concealment-of-income-when-there-is/20%Monthly2020-03-10 10:10
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-the-value-of-work-in-progress-was-to-be-taken-at-the-cost-of-raw-material-consumed-and-part-of-direct-labour-overheads-was-allocable-to-it-and-that-the-ratio-laid-down-in-cit-vs-brit/20%Monthly2020-01-24 12:32
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-whether-on-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-learned-tribunal-was-legally-correct-in-upholding-the-provisions-of-s-40a7-applicable-in-the-assessees-case-even-tho/20%Monthly2020-03-19 12:26
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-the-residence-of-its-managing-partner-were-searched-on-20th-nov-1990-by-the-competent-authorities-under-s-1321/20%Monthly2020-03-06 07:36
https://taxcaselaw.com/rajasthan-h-c-whether-the-blending-of-different-types-of-tea-by-the-assessee-amounts-to-production-of-a-thing-or-an-article-by-an-industrial-undertaking-within-the-meaning-of-expression-as-used-in-s/20%Monthly2020-03-21 09:29
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-whether-there-was-reasonable-cause-for-not-deducting-tax-at-source-under-s-192/20%Monthly2020-03-03 06:57
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-the-tribunal-was-right-in-law-in-holding-that-the-disallowance-under-r-6d-of-the-it-rules-1962-should-be-computed-on-the-bas/20%Monthly2020-03-19 06:17
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-m-s-atul-traders-petitioner-in-the-above-noted-three-writ-petitions-is-a-registered-partnership-firm-engaged-in-the-business-of-sale-of-dhan-bhoosi-and-filed-returns-for-the-asst-y/20%Monthly2020-03-19 08:40
https://taxcaselaw.com/uttaranchal-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-circumstances-of-the-case-the-tribunal-erred-in-law-in-holding-that-the-off-period-salary-paid-to-the-petitioner-was-liable-to-tax-in-ind/20%Monthly2020-03-31 05:01
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-petitioners-are-husband-and-wife-first-petitioner-herein-was-a-professor-in-pathology-of-the-calicut-medical-college-and-was-running-a-proprietary-concern-by-name-santhosh-clinic/20%Monthly2020-03-18 17:06
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-the-tribunal-was-right-in-law-in-holding-that-the-amount-received-under-the-central-governments-outright-grant-of-subs/20%Monthly2020-03-22 08:53
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-the-assessee-is-entitled-to-the-benefit-of-s-11-in-respect-of-the-amount-of-rs-165201-advanced-as-loan-to-certain-section-of-the-public-which-according-to-the-ito-the-assessee-had-w/20%Monthly2020-03-03 13:14
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-whether-the-tribunal-was-justified-in-confirming-the-view-taken-by-the-cita-holding-that-sub-cl-a-of-expln-4-appended-to-s-2711c-of-the-it-act-1961-was-applicable-only-if/20%Monthly2020-03-05 11:46
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-the-question-regarding-computation-of-capital-employed-for-granting-relief-under-s-80j-of-the-it-act-1961-was-rightly-decid/20%Monthly2020-03-05 09:37
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-the-expenditure-incurred-on-maintenance-of-the-transit-quarter-at-carmichael-road-bombay-for-accommodating-its-employees-visi/20%Monthly2020-03-06 08:30
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-the-tribunal-was-legally-justified-in-upholding-the-citas-finding-that-the-penalty-order-under-s-2711c-had-b/20%Monthly2020-03-19 08:00
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-whether-the-tribunal-was-justified-in-cancelling-the-penalty-under-s-2711c-especially-when-the-revised-return-was-filed-after-the-search-operation-when-loose-papers-recovered-indi/20%Monthly2020-03-19 05:57
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-the-assessee-trust-was-a-nondiscretionary-trust-for-the-purposes-of-applicability-of-appropriate-rate-of-tax/20%Monthly2020-03-06 11:00
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-income-toing-ship-tug-not-covered-section-172/20%Monthly2018-10-04 12:59
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-the-honble-tribunal-was-correct-in-holding-that-income-from-leasing-of-balrampur-lodge-to-sbi-was-assessable-as-bu/20%Monthly2020-03-19 16:12
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-the-ao-had-not-applied-his-mind-to-certain-aspects-of-the-case-and-had-merely-set-aside-the-assessment-and-a-conclusive-finding-on-the-issues-involved-was-yet-to-be-given-by-the-ao/20%Monthly2020-01-17 09:59
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-the-provisions-of-section-172-were-not-applicable-and-hence-tax-was-not-leviable-under-section-1722-in-respect-of-u-s-100000-received-by-the-assessee-for-towing-away-a-merchant-v/20%Monthly2018-10-04 12:59
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-the-petitioner-prays-for-quashing-of-the-impugned-notice-dt-20th-may-2004-in-relation-to-the-asst-yrs-1998-99-1999-2000-2000-01-and-2002-03-issued-by-the-it-authorities-under-s-148/20%Monthly2020-03-21 14:00
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-whether-under-the-facts-and-circumstances-of-the-case-the-tribunal-was-justified-in-law-in-upholding-the-applicability-of-the-provisions-of-s-1452-without-finding-any-mater/20%Monthly2020-03-20 08:08
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-whether-in-absence-of-a-specific-provision-in-the-act-the-tribunal-is-absolved-of-its-obligation-to-pass-or-pronounce-orders-after-listing-such-cases-for-pronouncement-o/20%Monthly2020-03-05 06:56
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-the-ao-issued-ext-p1-assessment-order-whereunder-petitioner-was-granted-refund-of-the-entire-advance-tax-paid-by-it-with-interest-under-s-244a/20%Monthly2020-03-19 17:12
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-whether-in-law-and-on-facts-of-the-case-the-tribunal-was-justified-in-excluding-the-amount-deposited-under-compulsory-deposit-scheme-from-the-net-wealth-of-the-assessee/20%Monthly2020-03-18 13:12
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-whether-the-tribunal-is-right-in-law-and-on-facts-in-cancelling-the-order-made-by-the-cit-in-exercise-of-the-powers-under-s-263-of-the-it-act-1961/20%Monthly2020-02-17 07:51
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-whether-the-tribunal-has-not-erred-in-law-and-on-facts-in-holding-that-the-order-of-rectification-made-by-the-ito/20%Monthly2020-03-06 10:23
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-whether-the-tribunal-was-right-in-law-in-holding-that-the-assessee-was-entitled-to-deduction-of-interest-for-12-months-for-the-calendar-year-1983-when-the-debit-note-was-received-after/20%Monthly2020-03-05 08:08
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-whether-the-tribunal-was-justified-in-law-in-holding-that-incentives-received-by-the-assessee-are-part-of-the-export-turnover-and-therefore-entitled-to-relief-under-s-80hhc-despite/20%Monthly2020-02-22 08:10
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-whether-on-the-facts-and-in-the-circumstances-of-the-case-the-tribunal-was-justified-in-law-in-holding-that-interest-of-rs-11696604-credited-to-the-interest-suspense-suit-filed-ac/20%Monthly2020-03-05 10:02
https://taxcaselaw.com/punjab-haryana-h-c-the-circular-also-goes-to-show-that-the-ao-or-the-tribunal-as-the-case-may-be-assuming-that-it-was-applicable-to-applications-filed-under-s-2542/20%Monthly2020-03-05 07:55