Supreme Court Of India
K.V. Shivkumar & Anr. vs. Appropriate Authority & Ors.
Section 269UD
B.N. Kirpal, D.P. Mohapatra & R.P. Sethi, JJ.
Review Petn. Nos. 749 & 750 of 2000 in Civil Appeal Nos. 1415 & 1416 of 2000
14th January, 2002
Counsel Appeared
R.S. Hegde, Somiran Sharma & P.P. Singh, for the Applicant in review petition : Gopal Subramanium with N.D.B. Raju, Ms. Bharathi R., Ms. Rizwana Parveen & Guntur Prabhakar, for the legal representatives of D.P. Sharma, Respondent : Mukul Rohtagi with Huzefa Ahmadi, Ms. Lakshmi Iyengar & B.V. Balaram Das, for the other Respondents
ORDER
BY THE COURT :
In the instant case there was compulsory purchase of the property which was sought to be sold. It is not in dispute that after the compulsory purchase the property was put to auction. The applicant-Shivkumar bid for Rs. 2,77,00,000 and a sum of Rs. 47,01,000 was deposited with the Department. This compulsory purchase has been set aside by this Court and as a result thereof the said amount of Rs. 47,01,000 is claimed by the applicant along with interest. It is the case of the Department that out of the bid amount only a sum of Rs. 47,01,000 was deposited and the balance was not deposited and therefore the amount deposited is liable to be forfeited.
Mr. Gopal Subramanium, the learned senior counsel appearing for the legal representatives of the respondent D.P. Sharma states that his client had contributed 1/3rd of this amount as a joint purchaser and the entire sum of Rs. 47,01,000 is not due and payable to Shivkumar. It is stated that some litigation (WP No. 40340 of 2001) is going on between the parties in the High Court at Bangalore.
In our opinion, as far as the Department is concerned, it is certainly not entitled to retain the sum of Rs. 47,01,000 which had been deposited pursuant to the auction sale when the compulsory purchase itself has been set aside. It is the case of the Department now before us that this amount has been forfeited because the balance amount had not been deposited. There is nothing on record to indicate the action of any such forfeiture. Furthermore, it is not for this Court to go into the question as to whether whole or any part of this amount of Rs. 47,01,000 is to be refunded to Shivkumar alone or someone else is also entitled to have a share in it.
In our opinion, it will be appropriate to direct the Department to deposit this amount of Rs. 47,01,000 along with interest at the rate of nine per cent from the date of payment till the date of deposit with the Registrar, Karnataka High Court. This deposit should be made within a period of eight weeks. Liberty is given to the parties to approach the High Court for appropriate orders with regard to the disbursement of the said amount. It will be open to the parties to raise such contentions as may be available to them in accordance with law. It is clarified that it will be open to the Department to prove that this amount of Rs. 47,01,000 stands forfeited.
4. In the second round of compulsory purchase a sum of Rs. 1,55,00,000 was deposited by Shivkumar. That amount after deducting any amount, if already paid, has to be refunded to Shivkumar with interest at the rate of nine per cent per annum from the date of deposit till the date of payment. This refund should be made within eight weeks. No dispute is raised by any party with regard to this amount of Rs. 1,55,00,000.
Both the review petitions as well as the interlocutory application are disposed of.
[Citation : 254 ITR 439]