taxcaselaw.com - Page 25 of 1370 - taxcaselaw.com

Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

Sec. 194H, Sec. 201(1), Section 201

Punjab & Haryana H.C : The Assessing Officer invoking the provisions of Section 194H of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on the payment of turnover discount of Rs.4,57,52,494/-

Avijit Das / May 9, 2018

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana CIT (TDS) vs. OCM India Limited Section : 194H, 201(1) Asst. Year : 2008-09 […]

Calcutta H.C : the appellant had not been served any notice prior to such order being made and that the appellant was not afforded any opportunity of hearing before the commissioner passed the relevant order

Avijit Das / May 7, 2018

High Court Of Calcutta Brolly Dealcom LLP vs. Pr.CIT Section 263 Sanjib Banerjee & Abhijit Gangopadhyay, JJ. ITA No. 25

Section 143, Income Tax Case Laws, Sec. 143(1)

Gujarat H.C : The reopening of assessment which was not raised earlier in assessment proceedings as well as before the CIT(A) and therefore was not emerging from the order of the CIT(A)

Avijit Das / May 7, 2018

High Court Of Gujarat Pr.CIT vs. Manzil Dineshkumar Shah Section 143(1) Asst. Year 2009-10 Akil Kureshi & B. N. Karia,

Sec. 36(1)(Viia)

Calcutta H.C : Tribunal has erred in law in allowing deduction under section 36(1) (viia) of the I.T.Act, 1961, for the same advances made for all previous years leading to multiple deductions in every assessment year by misinterpreting the Rule 6ABA of the I.T. Rules, 1962 and also against the ratio of judgmen in the case of J.K Synthetics Ltd. vs. UOI 199 ITR 43 (SC)

Avijit Das / May 7, 2018

High Court Of Calcutta Pr.CIT vs. Uttarabanga Kshetriya Gramin Bank Section 36(1)(viia) Asst. Year 2008-09 and 2009-10 Aniruddha Bose &

Chattisgarh H.C : Whether notice under Section 148 of the IT Act has been issued in terms of Section 149 of the IT Act to the petitioner before initiating proceeding for reassessment under Section 147 of the IT Act?

Avijit Das / May 4, 2018

High Court Of Chhattisgarh Ardent Steel Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr. Section 148 Asst. Year 2009-10

Calcutta H.C : the appellant did not file its return for the relevant assessment year within the period prescribed under Section 139 (1) of the Act.

Avijit Das / May 4, 2018

High Court Of Calcutta Suolificio Linea Italia (India) (P) Ltd. vs. JCIT Section 80-IB Sanjib Banerjee & Abhijit Gangopadhyay, JJ.

Sec. 132A, Sec. 158BB

S.C : Whether in the light of present facts and circumstances of the instant case, the material found in the course of survey in the premises of the builder could be used in Block Assessment of the assessee?

Avijit Das / May 2, 2018

Supreme Court Of India CIT vs. S. Ajit Kumar Section 132A, 158BB R. K. Agrawal & Abhay Manohar Sapre, JJ.

Income Tax Case Laws, Section 80-IA

Gujarat H.C : disallowance of deduction made by the Assessing Officer of Rs.4,97,39,025/-u/s. 80IA (4) of the Act

Avijit Das / May 2, 2018

High Court Of Gujarat CIT vs. Ranjit Projects Pvt. Ltd. Section 80IA(4) Asst. Year 2010-11 Akil Kureshi & B.N. Karia,

Section 132, Sec. 132A, Sec. 158BB

S.C : whether in the light of present facts and circumstances of the instant case, the material found in the course of survey in the premises of the builder could be used in Block Assessment of the assessee

Avijit Das / May 2, 2018

Supreme Court Of India CIT vs. S. Ajit Kumar Section 132A, 158BB R. K. Agrawal & Abhay Manohar Sapre, JJ.

Section 54F, Sec. 2(47)

Gujarat H.C : the appellant would not be entitled to benefit of deduction under section 54F of the Income Tax Act, 1961 since the construction of the flats for personal use was completed before the sale of the capital asset

Avijit Das / May 1, 2018

High Court Of Gujarat Ushaben Jayantilal Sodhan vs. ITO Section 54F, 2(47) Asst. Year . 2009-10 Akil Kureshi & B.

Post pagination

← Previous 1 … 24 25 26 … 1,370 Next →

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top