taxcaselaw.com - Page 240 of 1370 - taxcaselaw.com

Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

Sec. 143(3), Sec. 36(1)(iii), Section 14A

Punjab & Haryana H.C : The Hon’ble ITAT is correct in confirming the order of CIT(A) deleting the disallowance made under Section 14A read with Rule 8D, on account of interest on loans, on investments earning tax free income in the form of dividend.

Avijit Das / January 27, 2015

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana CIT-I vs. Abhishek Industries Ltd. Section 143(3), 14A, 36(1)(iii) Asst. Year 2004-05 Rajive Bhalla […]

Punjab & Haryana H.C : The Hon’ble ITAT is correct in confirming the order of CIT(A) deleting the disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D, on account of interest on loans, on investments earning tax free income in the form of dividend

Avijit Das / January 27, 2015

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana CIT-I vs. Abhishek Industries Ltd. Rajive Bhalla & B.S. Walia, JJ Asst. Year 2004-05

Sec. 260A, Section 144

Karnataka H.C : The reasons recorded for reopening of assessments had no nexus and the entire information was available with the Assessing Officer and therefore the reopened assessments was without jurisdiction, invalid and consequently was cancelled

Avijit Das / January 23, 2015

High Court Of Karnataka CIT And Another vs. Mcdowell And Co. Ltd. Section 260-A, 144 Asst. Year 2003-04 N.Kumar &

Sec. 115VG, Income Tax Case Laws, Section 115

Kerala H.C : the appellant, whom we hereinafter refer to as the ‘assessee’, is a ‘qualifying company’ in terms of Section 115VC and that it owns at least one ‘qualifying ship’ as defined in Section 115VD

Avijit Das / January 23, 2015

High Court Of Kerala Trans Asian Shipping Services (P.) Ltd. vs. CIT, Ernakulam Section : 115VG Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan And

Income Tax Case Laws, Sec. 10(23C), Sec. 2(15)

Delhi H.C : the petitioner seeks the quashing of the First Proviso to Section 2(15) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the said Act’) as amended by the Finance Act, 2008, on the ground that it is arbitrary and unreasonable and has no rational nexus with the object sought to be achieved and is thus violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India

Avijit Das / January 22, 2015

High Court Of Delhi India Trade Promotion Organization vs. Director General of Income-tax (Exemptions) Section : 2(15), 10(23C) Badar Durrez

Section 32, Section 147, Section 148

Gujarat H.C : The scrutiny of the return had taken place and, vide order dated November 29, 2010, the assessment order was passed under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Avijit Das / January 21, 2015

High Court Of Gujarat Gujarat Eco Textile Park Ltd. vs. ACIT Section 32, 148, 147 Assessment Year : 2008-09 Jayant

Bombay H.C : the Tribunal is right in placing reliance on the judgment in the case of ACIT v. M/s. Bhaumik Colours Pvt. Ltd. whereas in the instant case, the assessee is a registered and beneficial share holder of a company that has given loans to a third company that lent these, monies to the Assessee

Avijit Das / January 20, 2015

High Court Of Bombay CIT,Central-IV vs. Jignesh P. Shah Section : 2(22) Assessment Year : 2007-08 M.S. Sanklecha And G.S.

Karnataka H.C : Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case the Tribunal was right in deleting the addition of income from lottery business in the hands of the assessee treating it as HUF’s income and not the assessee on the basis of the Sales Tax Returns filed

Avijit Das / January 20, 2015

High Court Of Karnataka CIT, Mangalore vs. Manish Kumar Pajwani Section 4 Block period 1-4-1990 to 10-11-2000 N. Kumar And

Income Tax Case Laws, Sec. 37(1)

Gujarat H.C : the Appellate Tribunal was right in law in deleting the addition made on account of expenses incurred for replacement of membrane cells-II, treating the same as capital expenditure, by following the rule of consistency and without considering the issues on merits

Avijit Das / January 19, 2015

High Court Of Gujarat CIT-I vs. Gujarat Alkalies & Chemicals Ltd. Section : 37(1) Assessment Year : 1999-2000 Jayant Patel

Gujarat H.C : Whether the order below the stay application could be passed by respondent no.2 without recording any reasons or not?

Avijit Das / January 19, 2015

High Court Of Gujarat Hitech Outsourcing Services vs. ITO-Ward 6 (2) Section 251 Assessment year 2011-12 Jayant Patel And S.H.

Post pagination

← Previous 1 … 239 240 241 … 1,370 Next →

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top