Sec. 37(1), Section 37

Kerala H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the expenses incurred in filing appeal, revision, reference application, etc. (claimed an legal charges) against assessment under the Agrl. IT Act, are allowable deductions in computing the agricultural income under s. 5 of the Agrl. IT Act ?

/

High Court Of Kerala Commissioner Of Agricultural Income Tax vs. Emerald Valley Estates Ltd. Section 37(1) Asst. Year 1972-73, 1973-74, […]

Sec. 37(1), Section 37

Kerala H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in allowing the claims of the assessee towards legal expenses, travelling expenses for appeal and expenses relating to strike amounting to Rs. 200, Rs. 37.30 and Rs. 4,044.24, respectively, the presumption being that s. 5(j) of the Kerala Agrl. IT Act, 1950, corresponds to s. 10(2)(xv) of the Indian IT Act, 1922 ?

/

High Court Of Kerala Commissioner Of Agricultural Income Tax vs. S. Bhaskaran Nellithanam Rubber Product Co. Ltd. vs. State Of

Income Tax Case Laws

Madras H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the exemption provided in s. 33(1)(n) of the ED Act, 1953, should be allowed in respect of the dwelling house of the HUF from the value of the joint family properties before determining the share of the deceased and also that of the lineal descendants, the former for assessment and the latter for aggregation ?

/

High Court Of Madras Controller Of Estate Duty vs. Estate Of Late S.B. Rajarathnam Chettiar Section ED 33(1)(n) Ramanujam &

Section 119

Kerala H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is justified in holding that the circular issued by the CBDT existing at the beginning of the assessment year will be applicable and the assessee would be entitled to 100per cent amortisation for the assessment and the subsequent modification of the circular will have no relevance ?

/

High Court Of Kerala CIT vs. Geeva Films Section 119 Asst. Year 1972-73 V.P. Gopalan Nambiyar, C.J. & G. Balagangadharan

Section 104

Madras H.C : Whether the profit of Rs. 3,73,870 obtained by the assessee during the relevant previous year by the sale of chemicals imported by it on the strength of licences issued to it, based on its export performance of leather, both manufactured and purchased by it, was rightly held as not attributable to the manufacturing activity carried on by it ?

/

High Court Of Madras India Leather Corporation vs. CIT Section 104(4)(a) P. Govindan Nair, C.J. & V. Ramaswami, J. Tax

Income Tax Case Laws

Madras H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the profit of Rs. 6,63,658 obtained by the assessee during the relevant previous year by the sale of chemicals imported by it on the strength of the licence issued to it based on its earlier export performance of leather goods processed by it was not attributable to the manufacturing activity carried on by it and, hence, the assessee could not be considered as an ‘industrial company’ as defined in s. 2(6)(d) of the Finance Act 1968 ?

/

High Court Of Madras India Leather Corporation (P) Ltd. vs. CIT Section 1968FA 2(6)(d) Asst. Year 1968-69 P. Govindan Nair,

Scroll to Top
Malcare WordPress Security