Madras H.C : In respect of the same assessee, for asst. yrs. 1976-77 and 1978-79, a question similar to the one now referred was considered by this Court in Taxcase.

High Court Of Madras

B. Palaniswami vs. CIT

Section 64(1)(vi)

Asst. Year 1979-80

R. Jayasimha Babu & K. Gnanaprakasam, JJ.

Tax Case No. 312 of 1986

25th April, 2001

Counsel Appeared

P.P.S. Janarthana Raja, for the Assessee : T. Ravi Kumar, for the Revenue

JUDGMENT

R. JAYASIMHA BABU, J. :

In respect of the same assessee, for asst. yrs. 1976-77 and 1978-79, a question similar to the one now referred was considered by this Court in Taxcase. Nos. 509 and 510 of 1984—B. Palaniswamy vs. CIT (1997) 143 CTR (Mad) 368 : (1997) 225 ITR 432 (Mad) : TC S42.3647. By the decision of the Division Bench, dt. 14th March, 1996, that question was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.

Similar answer is required to be and is recorded for this asst. yr. 1979-80 as well. The question answered in favour of the assessee.

[Citation : 254 ITR 263]

Scroll to Top