High Court Of Gujarat
CIT vs. Mani Enterprises
Section 167A
Asst. Year 1984-85
M.S. Shah & A.M. Kapadia, JJ.
IT Ref. No. 137 of 1995
22nd January, 2004
Counsel Appeared :
Manish R. Bhatt, for the Petitioner : None, for the Respondent
JUDGMENT
M.S. SHAH, J. :
In this reference at the instance of the Revenue, the following question is referred to our opinion in respect of asst. yr. 1984-85 : “Whether the Tribunal is right in law and on facts in holding that provisions of s. 167A were not applicable in the present case and further directing that the assessee should be taxed at appropriate rateconsidering it as having determinate shares?” We have heard Mr. M.R. Bhatt, learned standing counsel for the Revenue. Though the notice is unserved on the respondent-assessee, we are inclined to proceed with the hearing of this reference in view of the fact that the question referred for our opinion is required to be answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. The assessee is an AOP. The assessee was sought to be charged tax at the maximum marginal rate under s. 167A of the IT Act, 1961 (“the Act” for short). The contention of the assessee was that the shares of the beneficiaries and/or the members were determinate and known and, therefore, the provisions of s. 167A of the Act were not applicable. The AO took the view that there are 13 members as beneficiaries of the trust and that the trust deed provided for admission of further members and the trust deed also provided for determination of shares of incoming members and about the conditions and procedure regarding admission of new members. The ITO, therefore, came to the conclusion that reading the trust deed as a whole, the number of members and their respective shares were not determinate and were not known and, therefore, applied the provisions of s. 167A and charged tax at the maximum marginal rate. In appeal, the assessee succeeded as the Dy. CIT(A) held that the provisions of s. 167A of the Act were not applicable. The Revenue’s appeal came to be dismissed by the Tribunal.
Hence, this reference at the instance of the Revenue. Mr. M.R. Bhatt, learned standing counsel for the Revenue, has submitted that since the trust deed provided for admitting new members, the shares of the existing members were liable to change and, therefore, the shares were indeterminate and accordingly the provisions of s. 167A were attracted. On going through the judgment of the Tribunal, we find that the Tribunal has given the findings of fact that in the constitution deed, the beneficiaries have been named; they are all individuals; their shares are specific and that the assessee is an AOP, the shares of whose members are determinate. It was on this basis that the Tribunal held that the provisions of s. 167A of the Act were not applicable. The Tribunal has further held that it was an admitted fact that no new member was admitted after the AOP was formed on 10th April, 1961 and and was dissolved on 22nd Feb., 1985 and that throughout the existence of the AOP, the same members, whose names were mentioned in the constitution, continued. Consequently, the specific and determinate shares of the members did not undergo any change. In view of the aforesaid findings of fact given by the Tribunal which have not been challenged, in our view, the Tribunal rightly held that the clauses contained in the trust deed enabling the trustees to enrol more members did not convert the specific determinate shares of the existing members into indeterminate shares. Clauses 5 and 6 relied by the Revenue read as under : “Clause 5 lays down that any person shall be eligible to become a member of the association and cl. 6 lays down that the members of the association can be acquired by an application for membership or by transfer of members or by any other mode that may be decided by the association from time to time.
8. As already indicated earlier, mere possibility of admission of new members to the association in future did not change the determinate shares of existing members. Section 167A of the Act, as was in force at the relevant time (which was inserted by the Finance Act, 1981, w.e.f. 1st April, 1981 till substituted by the Finance Act, 1985, w.e.f. 1st April, 1985), read as under : “167A. Charge of tax where shares of members unknown.—(1) Where the individual shares of the members of an AOP (other than a company or co-operative society) in the income of such association are indeterminate or unknown, tax shall be charged on the total income of the association at the maximum marginal rate. (2) Where the individual shares of the members of an AOP (other than a company or co- operative society) in any part of the income of such association are indeterminate or unknown, the income-tax payable by the association shall be the aggregate of— (i) the amount of income-tax calculated on the aforesaid part of the total income, at the maximum marginal rate; and (ii) the amount of income-tax with which it would have been chargeable had the remaining part of the total income been its total income.
Explanation : For the purposes of this section,— (a) “maximum marginal rate” shall have the meaning assigned to it in Expln. 2 below sub-s. (3) of s. 164; (b) the individual shares of the members of an AOP in the income of such association shall be deemed to be indeterminate or unknown if such shares are indeterminate or unknown on the date of formation of such association or at any time thereafter.” For the applicability of the above provisions, it was necessary that the individual shares of the members of the association were indeterminate or unknown on the date of formation of such association or at any time thereafter. Admittedly, on the date of formation of the association, the shares were determinate or known. Hence, the first part would not apply. As far as the second part is concerned, “or at any time thereafter” has already been negatived in view of the finding of fact given by the Tribunal that without any addition of new members the individuals who were members on the date of formation of the AOP continued till the AOP continued to exist. It is necessary to note that cl. (b) of s. 167A did not provide that the shares are indeterminate or unknown on the date of formation of such association or “are capable of changing at any time after the date of formation”. In view of the plain language of the provisions of s. 167A of the Act and in view of the specific shares of the individuals who were members of the association during the relevant period as indicated above, in our view, the Tribunal rightly held that the provisions of s. 167A of the Act were not applicable in the facts of the case.
9. We accordingly answer the question in the affirmative i.e., in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. The reference accordingly stands disposed of.
[Citation : 267 ITR 157]
