CESTAT-Mumbai : Where assessee-trust received certain amount as supervision charges and claimed that it was for administration of trust and to make remunerations of staff members, since no specific activity had been identified by revenue for which supervision charges had been received, said charges could not be brought to tax under category of ‘Business auxiliary service’

CESTAT, Mumbai Bench Shri Dnyaneshwar Trust Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Aurangabad Period 2006-07 to 2009-10 Section 65(19) Ramesh Nair, Judicial Member And Raju, Technical Member Order No. A/89357/2017/STB Appeal No. ST/87878/2013 August  31, 2017 ORDER Raju, Technical Member – The appellant, M/s. Shri Dnyaneshwar Trust are public charitable trust. They are in appeal against confirmation…

This content is for Annual members only.
Log In Register