Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

Section 3

Sec. 27A, Section 3, Wealth Tax Act

Madhya Pradesh H.C : The wealth of the assessee has been disclosed in the case of HUF following the order of the CIT(A).

Avijit Das / March 14, 2001

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh CIT vs. R.N. RAI Section WT 3, WT 27A Asst. year 1982-83, 1983-84, 1984-85, 1985-86, […]

Section 3, Wealth Tax Act

S.C : We have read the judgment and order under appeal and heard learned counsel. There is no merit in the appeal.

Avijit Das / January 31, 2001

Supreme Court Of India Commissioner Of Wealth Tax & Anr. vs. Bombay Cricket Association Sections WT 3 Asst. Year 1973-74,

Section 3, Wealth Tax Act

Madras H.C : The Tribunal has rightly held that the amount which the appellant was allowed to receive against the bank guarantee pending disposal of the appeal preferred by the State against the judgment of the High Court enhancing the compensation for the land compulsorily acquired from the assessee

Avijit Das / December 4, 2000

High Court Of Madras Commissioner Of Wealth Tax vs. A.R. Krishnamurthy Sections WT 2(m), WT 3 R. Jayasimha Babu &

Sec. 2(m), Section 3, Wealth Tax Act

Madras H.C : Whether the Tribunal was right in deleting the addition of Rs. 1,00,000 made to the net wealth of the assessee for the asst. yr. 1977-78.

Avijit Das / November 15, 2000

High Court Of Madras Commissioner Of Wealth Tax vs. A. Packirisamy Sections 2(M), 3 Asst. Year 1977-78 R. Jayasimha Babu

Section 3, Wealth Tax Act

Bombay H.C : Whether value of the property consisting of office premises at Maker Chambers III at Nariman Point was includible in the net wealth of the assessee

Avijit Das / February 28, 2000

High Court Of Bombay Commissioner Of Wealth Tax vs. CEMA (P) Ltd. Section WT 3 S.H. Kapadia & A.P. Shah,

Section 20, Section 3, Wealth Tax Act

Gujarat H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in coming to the conclusion that, on the death of Shri Chandrasinhrao on 27th March, 1965, there was complete partition of the HUF of Dadasaheb Ukajirao of which Chandrasinhrao was the Karta?

Avijit Das / November 5, 1998

High Court Of Gujarat Commissioner Of Wealth Tax vs. Chandrasinhrao D. Gaekwad Sections WT 3, WT 20 Asst. Year 1966-67,

Sec. 2(m), Section 3, Wealth Tax Act

Madhya Pradesh H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the gift of Rs. 10,30,000 made by the Karta of the assessee-HUF out of the HUF’s funds by delivery of the amount to the donee was void ab initio and the said amount continues to be an asset belonging to the assessee HUF and the same is includible, while computing the net wealth of the assessee-HUF, for wealth-tax purposes ?

Avijit Das / August 27, 1996

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh : Indore Bench K.P. Gupta (HUF) vs. CIT Sections WT 2(m), WT 3 Asst. Years

Section 3, Wealth Tax Act

Rajasthan : Jaipur Bench H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in interpreting the gift deed dt. 9th Sept., 1938, that the immovable property known as Barwara House was gifted to the late Raja Mansingh and not to his HUF ?

Avijit Das / April 27, 1993

High Court Of Rajasthan : Jaipur Bench Raja Man Singh vs. Commissioner Of Wealth Tax Sections WT 2(m), WT 3

Sec. 2(e), Sec. 2(m), Section 20, Section 3, Section 4, Wealth Tax Act

Karnataka H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the partition is deemed to have taken place under Explanation I to s. 6 of the Hindu Succession Act and the half share of the deceased which has devolved on the heirs cannot be included in the net wealth of the HUF ?

Avijit Das / January 4, 1991

High Court Of Karnataka Commissioner Of Wealth Tax vs. N.A. Mayanna By LRs Sections WT 3, WT 4, WT 20,

Sec. 2(e), Sec. 7(1), Section 2, Section 3, Section 7, Wealth Tax Act

Bombay H.C : Whether, on a proper construction of cl. 12 of the will executed by Lady Serenebai J. Jeejeebhoy, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the assessee’s life interest under the trust had no value within the meaning of s. 7 of the WT Act ?

Avijit Das / June 7, 1990

High Court Of Bombay Commissioner Of Wealth Tax vs. Mrs. Aimy N.E. Pandole Sections WT 2(e), WT 3, WT 7(1),

Post pagination

← Previous 1 2 3 4 Next →

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top