Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

Section 95

S.C : These two appeals arise out of the final judgment and order passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Crl. Misc. (M) Nos. 360/2002 and 447/2002 filed under s. 482 of the CrPC r/w Art. 227 of the Constitution of India by the appellants herein seeking the invocation of the inherent powers of the High Court for quashing the FIRs

Avijit Das / May 2, 2003

Supreme Court Of India Hira Lal Hari Lal Bhagwati vs. Central Bureau Of Investigation Sections 1998FA (No. 2) 91, 95(ii)(a), […]

S.C : The appellants are job workers who process fabric on behalf of others. A question arose as to whether or not they were liable to pay excise duty, and if so, on what basis the value had to be worked out. Show-cause notices were issued to them.

Avijit Das / April 2, 2003

Supreme Court Of India Lajya Dyeing & Bleaching Works vs. Union Of India & Ors. Sections 1998FA(No. 2) 95 S.N.

Sec. 95(i)(c), Section 95

Madhya Pradesh H.C : The question is with regard to an interpretation of s. 95(i) of the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998 (hereinafter shall be referred to as the “Scheme of 1998”).

Avijit Das / January 7, 2003

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh : Indore Bench Shree Amarlal Kirana Stores vs. CIT And Others Section 95(i)(c) Deepak Verma

Sec. 95(i)(c), Section 95

S.C : The grievance of the appellants in these three appeals arises out of an order passed by the Respondent No. 1 rejecting the appellant’s declarations which the appellants had filed under the “Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998” (referred to briefly as “the Scheme”).

Avijit Das / December 17, 2002

Supreme Court Of India Dr. (Mrs.) Renuka Datla & Ors. vs. CIT & Anr. Sections 1998FA 87(m), 1998FA 88, 1998FA

Madhya Pradesh H.C : what is the meaning of the words “is admitted and pending” used in s. 95(c) ibid ?

Avijit Das / November 13, 2002

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh : Indore Bench Shree Amarlal Kirana Stores vs. CIT & Ors. Section 1998FA (No. 2)

Sec. 95(i)(c), Section 95

Rajasthan H.C : The Government of India introduced the scheme in the name of Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998, under Chapter IV of Finance Act, 1998, with a view to provide a quick and voluntary settlement of tax dues as on 31st March, 1998, both in various direct tax enactments as well as indirect taxes enactment by offering waiver of a part of the arrear taxes and interest and providing immunity against institution of prosecution and imposition of penalty.

Avijit Das / July 3, 2002

High Court Of Rajasthan Bindu Prasad Soni vs. Union Of India & Anr. Sections 1998FA(No. 2) 87(m), 1998FA(No. 2) 90,

Sec. 95(i)(c), Section 95

S.C : the petitioner filed an application under s. 264 before the CIT for revising the order of assessment dt. 12th Jan., 1996.

Avijit Das / October 26, 1999

Supreme Court Of India Computwel Systems (P) Ltd. vs. W. Hasan & Anr. Sections 1998FA (No. 2) 88, 1998FA (No.

Post pagination

← Previous 1 2

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top