Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

Sec. 80RRA

Delhi H.C : The petitioner is not entitled to the benefit of s. 80RRA of the Act because he has not rendered any service outside India for which he received the remuneration in question

Avijit Das / February 23, 2006

High Court Of Delhi K.R. Pradeep vs. Central Board Of Direct Taxes Section 80RRA Markandeya Katju, C.J. & Madan B. […]

Karnataka H.C : M/s Oiltanking, a foreign company entered into an agreement with the petitioner in the matter of providing consultancy services. There are various clauses seen in the agreement. An application was made to the Government in the matter of approval of the agreement. The agreement was approved subject to a condition. The conditional approval reads as under: “The approval for exemption is limited proportionally to the stay and work abroad with the total amount received by applicant.

Avijit Das / July 25, 2003

High Court Of Karnataka A.S. Mani vs. Union Of India & Ors. Sections 80RRA R. Gururajan, J. Writ Petn. No.

Delhi H.C : The petitioner is aggrieved with the order dt. 28th Jan., 1978, passed by the respondent, whereby his representation dt. 26th Sept., 1977, was rejected.

Avijit Das / May 30, 2002

High Court Of Delhi Mahendra Raj vs. Joint Secretary, Government Of India, Ministry Of Finance & Ors. Section 80RRA Dalveer

Delhi H.C : The petitioner had claimed the entitlement of deduction under s. 80RRA

Avijit Das / May 30, 2002

High Court Of Delhi Mahendra Raj vs. Joint Secretary, Government Of India, Ministry Of Finance & Ors. Section 80RRA Dalveer

Sec. 80RRA, Section 80RR

S.C : This is an appeal from the judgment and order of the Division Bench of the High Court of Bombay whereby the Division Bench concurred with the judgment and order of the learned single judge of the Court.

Avijit Das / November 27, 1987

Supreme Court Of India Central Board Of Direct Taxes vs. Aditya V. Birla Sections 80RRA, 10(6)(vii) Sabyasachi Mukharji & S.

Sec. 5(1)(c), Sec. 80RRA, Section 5, Section 91

Andhra Pradesh H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee is entitled to relief, under s. 91 of the IT Act, 1961, of the entire tax deducted at source by the Government of Iran?

Avijit Das / July 28, 1987

High Court Of Andhra Pradesh CIT vs. C.S. Murthy B.P. Jeevan Reddy & Y.V. Anjaneyulu, JJ. Sections 5(1)(c), 80RRA, 91

Sec. 80RRA, Section 80RR

Bombay H.C : Mr. Parekh fairly states that the only ground on which the agreement has been disapproved by the Government is that the applicant was not in the service of a foreign employer as such and hence Thai Rayon Co. Ltd. could not be regarded as an employer of the applicant.

Avijit Das / August 27, 1986

High Court Of Bombay Central Board Of Direct Taxes & Ors. vs. Aditya V. Birla Section 80RRA M.H. Kania, C.J.

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top