Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

Section 80J

Andhra Pradesh H.C : the assessee company is to be treated as an industrial undertaking for the purpose of deduction under s. 80J

Avijit Das / March 22, 2006

High Court Of Andhra Pradesh CIT vs. Srinivasa Sea Foods Ltd. Section 80J Bilal Nazki & G. Chandraiah, JJ. Case […]

Allahabad H.C : Whether, even after finding that the production could not come out in a final shape, the Tribunal was legally justified in holding that the mill had started manufacturing goods during the year under reference within the meaning of s. 80J of the IT Act, 1961 ?

Avijit Das / December 15, 2005

High Court Of Allahabad Kanodia & Sons vs. CIT Section 80J, Asst. Year 1976-77 A.K. Yog & Prakash Krishna, JJ.

Gujarat H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the question regarding computation of capital employed for granting relief under s. 80J of the IT Act, 1961, was rightly decided by the Tribunal ?

Avijit Das / July 11, 2005

High Court Of Gujarat CIT vs. Cadila Chemicals (P) Ltd. Section 80J Asst. Year 1982-83 D.A. Mehta & Ms. H.N.

Allahabad H.C : Whether the learned Tribunal was justified in law in allowing the benefit of deduction under s. 80J to the assessee for the asst. yr. 1978-79 ?

Avijit Das / May 3, 2005

High Court Of Allahabad CIT vs. Adarsh Cold Storage Section 80J Asst. Year 1979-80 R.K. Agrawal & Rajes Kumar, JJ.

Section 32A, Section 80HHC, Section 80J

Calcutta H.C : The deduction under ss. 32A, 80HH and 80J of the IT Act, 1961 relevant to asst. yrs. 1983-84 and 1985-86

Avijit Das / January 28, 2005

High Court Of Calcutta Andaman & Nicobar Islands Forest & Plantation Development Corpn. Ltd. vs. CIT Sections 32A, 80HH, 80J

Section 80HH, Section 80J

Allahabad H.C : Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is justified in law in holding that the assessee was entitled to deduction under s. 80HH of the IT Act, 1961 ?

Avijit Das / December 6, 2004

High Court Of Allahabad CIT vs. Quality Steel Tubes (P) Ltd. Sections 80HH, 80J Asst. Year 1981-82 R.K. Agrawal &

Section 80HH, Section 80J

Allahabad H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee was. entitled to relief under ss. 80J and 80HH for the asst. yrs. 1976-77 and 1977-78.

Avijit Das / November 5, 2004

High Court Of Allahabad CIT vs. Sultan & Sons Rice Mill Sections 80HH(2)(iv), 80J(4)(iv) Asst. Year 1976-77, 1977-78 R.K. Agrawal

Punjab & Haryana H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in directing the AO to recompute deduction under s. 80J by including a sum of Rs. 1,50,000 in the capital employed.

Avijit Das / October 26, 2004

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana CIT vs. Shree Raghunath Cotton Ginning & Oil Factory Section 80J Asst. Year 1985-86

Section 263, Section 80J

Allahabad H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was legally justified in setting aside the order of the CIT passed under s. 263

Avijit Das / August 17, 2004

High Court Of Allahabad CIT vs. Vincast Engineering Section 80J, 263, Asst. Year 1977-78 R.K. Agrawal & K.N. Ojha, JJ.

Sec. 40(b), Section 80HH, Section 80J

Allahabad H.C : Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the salary allowed to Yadav Kishan Goel was adable under s. 40(b) of the IT Act, 1961 ?

Avijit Das / August 16, 2004

High Court Of Allahabad G.T. Cold Storage & Ice Factory vs. CIT Sections 40(b), 80HH, 80J Asst. Year 1976-77, 1977-78,

Post pagination

← Previous 1 2 3 … 11 Next →

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top