Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

Section 80

Sec. 80U, Section 80

Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee is entitled to in law to the relief under s. 80U of the IT Act, 1961 ?

Avijit Das / January 8, 2002

High Court Of Gujarat CIT vs. Narendra R. Oza Sections 80U R.K. Abichandani & K.A. Puj, JJ. IT Ref. No. […]

Gujarat H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee is entitled to in law to the relief under s. 80U of the IT Act, 1961 ?

Avijit Das / January 8, 2002

High Court Of Gujarat CIT vs. Narendra R. OZA Sections 80U R.K. Abichandani & K.A. Puj, JJ. IT Ref. No.

Sec. 80P(2)(a)(iii), Section 80P

Madras H.C : Whether the Tribunal was right in holding that the assessee-marketing society which is engaged in the business of purchase and sale of lint is entitled to the benefit of s. 80P(2)(a)(iii) of the IT Act ?

Avijit Das / November 12, 2001

High Court Of Madras CIT vs. RA 363 Virudhunagar Cooperative Marketing Society Ltd. Section 80P(2)(a)(iii) Asst. Year 1987-88 R. Jayasimha

Sec. 80C, Section 80

Madras H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in law in directing the AO to allow deduction under s. 80C as claimed by the assessee?

Avijit Das / November 5, 2001

High Court Of Madras CIT vs. Saurin S. Zaveri Section 80C Asst. Year 1987-88, 1988-89 R. Jayasimha Babu and A.K.

Section 139, Section 182, Section 67, Section 80

Andhra Pradesh H.C : The assessee was not entitled to carry forward the share of loss determined in the hands of the firm, Nagarjuna Construction Corporation, for the asst. yr. 1982-83

Avijit Das / October 18, 2001

High Court Of Andhra Pradesh K.V.K. Raju (HUF) vs. CIT Sections 67, 80, 139, 182 Asst. Year 1983-84 S.R. Nayak

Sec. 260A, Section 260, Section 80, Section 80-I, Section 80HH

Gauhati H.C : This is an appeal under s. 260A of the IT Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act, 1961”).

Avijit Das / August 9, 2001

High Court Of Gauhati CIT vs. Down Town Hospital Ltd. Sections 80HH, 80-I, 260A Asst. Year 1994-95 J.N. Sarma &

Sec. 139(3), Sec. 260A, Section 139, Section 260, Section 80

Madras H.C : the request for extension of time had been made under s. 139(1)

Avijit Das / July 30, 2001

High Court Of Madras CIT vs. Tamil Nadu Agro Industries Corporation Ltd. Sections 80, 139(3), 260A Asst. Year 1987-88 R.

Section 80, Section 80-I, Section 80A, Section 80B, Section 80HH

Bombay H.C : Whether the AO was right in rejecting the claim of the assessee on the ground that the gross total income of the assessee, computed as per the provisions of the Act before deductions under Chapter VI-A, was Nil ?

Avijit Das / July 23, 2001

High Court Of Bombay Synco Industries Ltd. vs. Assessing Officer & Ors. Sections 80A(2), 80B(5), 80HH, 80-I Asst. Year 1990-91,

Section 80, Section 80AB

Gujarat H.C : Whether, the Tribunal is right in law in holding that the assessee is entitled to a deduction under s. 80L of the IT Act, 1961 in respect of Rs. 2,000 and Rs. 3,308 received on its compulsory deposits for the asst. yrs. 1982-83 and 1983-84 respectively, disregarding the provisions of s. 80AB of the IT Act, 1961?

Avijit Das / July 5, 2001

High Court Of Gujarat CIT vs. Apoorva Shantilal Shah (HUF) Sections 80AB, 80L Asst. Year 1982-83, 1983-84 A.R. Dave &

Sec. 260A, Section 260, Section 80, Section 80-IA, Section 80HH

S.C : the liquidated damages received by the assessee on account of breach of contract are nothing but a part of profit received from the industrial undertaking on which the assessee is entitled for deduction under ss. 80HH and 80-IA

Avijit Das / May 9, 2001

Supreme Court Of India CIT vs. Alpine Solvex Ltd. Sections 80HH, 80-IA, 260A B.N. Kirpal, Mrs. Ruma Pal & Brijesh

Post pagination

← Previous 1 … 3 4 5 … 7 Next →

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top