Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

Section 74

Section 10, Sec. 260A, Section 10A, Section 10B, Section 263, Section 70, Section 72, Section 74

Madras H.C : Section 10B(6) was attracted and deduction under Section 10B was to be computed without setting off of any carried forward losses and unabsorbed depreciation of the earlier assessment years

Avijit Das / January 11, 2019

High Court Of Madras Intimate Fashions (India) P. Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner Ofincome Tax Section 10A, 10A(1), 10A(1A), 10A(4), 10A(6), […]

Section 74, Income Tax Case Laws

Karnataka H.C : The appellate authorities were correct in allowing depreciation in respect of a grounded aircraft which had not been used by the assessee and had been admitted in the audit report and not specifically adverted to in the course of orders

Avijit Das / November 19, 2013

High Court Of Karnataka CIT vs. Mcdowell And Co. Ltd. Assessment Year : 1998-99 Section : 74 N. Kumar And

Delhi H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in allowing the sum of Rs. 2,62,658 as a short-term capital loss in the asst. yr. 1975-76?

Avijit Das / February 7, 2001

High Court Of Delhi CIT vs. Capital Bus Services (P) Ltd. Sections 74 Asst. Year 1975-76 Arijit Pasayat, C.J. &

Section 70, Section 71, Section 72, Section 73, Section 74

Orissa H.C : Whether the assessee is a registered-firm and any loss which cannot be set off against any other income of the firm shall be apportioned between the partners of the firm and they alone shall be entitled to have the amount of the loss set off and carried forward for set off under ss. 70, 71, 72, 73, 74 and 74A ?

Avijit Das / August 1, 1991

High Court Of Orissa CIT vs. Mahalakshmi Film Distributors Sections 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 74a, 75, 75(1), 75(2) Asst.

Sec. 45(1), Section 45, Section 48, Section 70, Section 74, Section 80, Section 80B

Calcutta H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in law in holding that the assessee was entitle to the deduction under s. 80T(b)(i) of the IT Act, 1961, on the gross capital gains arising on the sale of house property?

Avijit Das / December 14, 1988

High Court Of Calcutta CIT vs. Rangalal Bagaria Sections 45, 45(1), 48, 70, 74, 80B, 80T Asst. Year 1974-75 Ajit

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top