Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

Sec. 37(1)

Sec. 37(1), Section 37

Punjab & Haryana H.C : Interest from others and also from IDBI constitute profit of the business for the purpose of computing deduction under section 80HHC

Avijit Das / September 19, 2016

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana CIT (Central), Ludhiana vs. Hero Cycles Ltd. Section : 37(1) Assessment year : 1991-92 […]

Sec. 37(1), Section 37

Madras H.C : The expenditure of Rs. 2.381 Crores claimed by the assessee as payment made towards sub-contractors can be allowed as deduction, even though the assessee had not filed any supporting bills or any other evidence for the expenses debited in the assessees books of accounts

Avijit Das / September 7, 2016

High Court Of Madras CIT, Chennai vs. SVE Engineers (P.) Ltd. Section 37(1) Nooty Ramamohana Rao And Dr. P. Devadass,

Section 64, Sec. 37(1)

Kerala H.C : Ought not the Tribunal had allowed the expenditure claimed on the use of cars and telephone bills allowable expenditure under Section 37(1) of the Act

Avijit Das / August 26, 2016

High Court Of Kerala S. Gopalakrishnan vs. CIT, Thiruvananthapuram Section 64, 37(1) Assessment Year 2004-05 Antony Dominic And P.V. Asha,

Sec. 37(1), Section 37

Gujarat H.C : The conclusion reached by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal that the purchases aggregating to Rs. 3,15,952/- were bogus, is such could be arrived at

Avijit Das / June 22, 2016

High Court Of Gujarat Vijay Trading Co. vs. ITO Section 37(1) Assessment Years 1993-94 To 1996-97 K.S. Jhaveri And G.R.

Sec. 37(1), Section 31

Madras H.C : The claim of Expenses incurred on Life Extension Program (LEP) of Thermal Power Station (TPS-1), as Revenue Expenditure

Avijit Das / April 12, 2016

High Court Of Madras CIT, Chennai-LTU vs. Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd. Section : 37(1), 31 Assessment Years : 1993-94 To

Section 9, Sec. 10(15A), Sec. 37(1), Sec. 40(a)(i), Section 14A, Section 43B, Section 68

Delhi H.C : The Assessee could be regarded as Assessee in default for failing to deduct tax at source in respect of payments made to AAR Aviation Trading Inc as required under Section 195

Avijit Das / November 4, 2015

High Court Of Delhi Jet Lite (India) Ltd. vs. CITâ€“XVI Assessment Years : 1995-96 To 1999-2000 Section : 9, 10(15A),

Section 69A, Sec. 37(1)

Bombay H.C : The third member of the Tribunal erred in holding that he is bound to accept the view of one of the two members in spite of the fact that he has a third view

Avijit Das / October 30, 2015

High Court Of Bombay Harish Textile Engrs. Ltd. vs. DCIT, Special Range-1 Block Period : 1-4-1986 To 12-9-1996 Section :

Income Tax Case Laws, Sec. 37(1)

Bombay H.C : The expenditure of Rs.43,600/ on medical treatment of eyes for improving the vision has an element of personal expenditure, and accordingly the expenditure incurred by the appellant on foreign tour for pre operation investigation relating to his eyes cannot be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1)

Avijit Das / October 28, 2015

High Court Of Bombay Dhimant Hiralal Thakar vs. CIT Section 37(1) Asst. Year 1986-87 M.S. Sanklecha & G.S. Kulkarni, JJ.

Sec. 37(1), Sec. 260A, Sec. 43(3), Section 32

S.C : Whether Rs. 12,24,700/- claimed as revenue expenditure by the Association of persons which was constituted by the three partners of the erstwhile firm, MGBW, can be allowed as permissible deduction in the hands of the said Association of persons under Section 37 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961, as being laid out or expended wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business of the said Association of Persons?

Avijit Das / October 26, 2015

Supreme Court Of India Mangalore Ganesh Beedi Works vs. CIT, Mysore Section : 37(1), 32, 43(3), 260A Madan B. Lokur

Income Tax Case Laws, Sec. 37(1), Section 37

Delhi H.C : Whether provision for transit breakages has a scientific basis or is contingent in nature and as such is not an allowable deduction while computing the total income of the Assessees. The Assessment Years (AYs’) involved in the present appeals are AYs 2001-02 to 2004-05

Avijit Das / October 6, 2015

High Court Of Delhi Seagram Distilleries (P.) Ltd. vs. CIT-III, New Delhi Assessment Years : 2001-02 To 2004-05 Section :

Post pagination

← Previous 1 … 3 4 5 … 85 Next →

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top