Delhi H.C : The amount in issue was not a loan within the meaning of Section 269SS of the Act
High Court Of Delhi CIT vs. Pawan Kumar Jain Sanjiv Khanna & Chander Shekhar, JJ. Section 271D, 269SS Asst. Year […]
High Court Of Delhi CIT vs. Pawan Kumar Jain Sanjiv Khanna & Chander Shekhar, JJ. Section 271D, 269SS Asst. Year […]
High Court Of MP (Indore Bench) Nitin Agrawal vs. Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax Section 271D, 271E P.K. Jaiswal &
High Court Of Kerala JCIT & Ors. vs. Grihalakshmi Productions & Another Section 271D, 271E Antony Dominic & A.M.Babu, JJ.
High Court Of Delhi Pr.CIT (Central)-2 vs. Mahesh Wood Products (P.) Ltd. Section 275, 271D, 271E Assessment year 2009-10 Dr.
High Court Of Rajasthan CIT vs. Chandra Cement Ltd. Section : 269SS, 271D Assessment years : 1992-93 and 1993-94 Ajay
High Court Of Allahabad CIT -II, Agra vs. Smt. Dimpal Yadav Section 269SS, 271D, 273B Assessment year 2006-07 Tarun Agarwala
High Court Of Madras CIT, Pondicherry vs. M. Ramakrishnan Assessment Years : 2008-09 And 2009-10 Section : 269T, 271E, 269SS,
High Court Of Madras P. Muthukaruppan vs. Joint Commissioner of Income-tax Section 269SS, 269T, 271D, 271E and 273B Assessment years
High Court Of Madras Nandhi Dhall Mills vs. CIT Section 269SS, 271D Assessment year 1998-99 R. Sudhakar And R. Karuppiah,
High Court Of Delhi CIT, Delhi-VIII, New Delhi vs. Muthoot Financiers Section : 269SS, 271D Sanjiv Khanna And V. Kameswar