Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

Sec. 271(1)(a)

Sec. 271(1)(a), Section 271

Kerala H.C : This reference arises from the penalty levied by the AO under s. 271(1)(a) of the IT Act for the belated filing of income-tax return.

Avijit Das / December 7, 2001

High Court Of Kerala CIT vs. V.I. Abraham Section 271(1)(a) S. Sankarasubban & C.N. Ramachandran Nair, JJ. IT Ref. No. […]

Sec. 271(1)(a), Section 271

Madras H.C : The assessee is aggrieved by the order of penalty for delayed submission of return. Admittedly, the delay was long. Numerous applications for extension of time had been filed.

Avijit Das / September 25, 2001

High Court Of Madras Premier Metal & Engineering Corporation vs. CIT Section 271(1)(a) R. Jayasimha Babu & Mrs. A. Subbulakshmy,

Gujarat H.C : Whether, the Tribunal has been right in law in confirming the view taken by the AAC in deleting the penalty imposed by the ITO under s. 271(1)(a) of the IT Act, 1961 ?

Avijit Das / September 18, 2001

High Court Of Gujarat CIT vs. Textile & General Engineer Co. Sections 271(1)(a), 271(2) Asst. Year 1976-77, 1977-78, 1978-79, 1979-80

Sec. 271(1)(a), Section 271

Madras H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in cancelling the penalty levied under s. 271(1)(a) for the asst. yr. 1970-71?

Avijit Das / March 7, 1997

High Court Of Madras CIT vs. P. Joseph Swaminathan Section 271(1)(a) Asst. Year 1970-71 K.A. Swami, C.J. & Kanakaraj, J.

Sec. 271(1)(a), Section 271

Rajasthan : Jaipur Bench H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in deleting the penalty of Rs. 7,339 levied under s. 271(1)(a) of the IT Act, 1961 ?

Avijit Das / December 9, 1993

High Court Of Rajasthan : Jaipur Bench CIT vs. Yematake Honeywell Co. Ltd. Section : 271(1)(a) Asst. Year 1976-77 K.C.

Sec. 139(4), Sec. 139(8), Sec. 271(1)(a), Section 139, Section 140, Section 141, Section 271

S.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that, by the levy of interest under s. 139 of the IT Act, 1961, the ITO must be deemed to have granted time up to the date of filing the return of income ?

Avijit Das / October 31, 1990

Supreme Court Of India CIT & Anr. vs. M.J. Daveda (Deceased) By Lrs. & Anr. Sections 139(4), 139(8), 140A, 141,

Sec. 256(2), Sec. 271(1)(a), Section 256, Section 271

Allahabad H.C : Whether the Tribunal erred in confirming the order passed by the AAC of Income-tax by which he deleted the penalty under s. 271(1)(a) of the Act imposed on the assessee.

Avijit Das / April 6, 1990

High Court Of Allahabad CIT vs. Chaubey & Co. Sections 271(1)(a), 256(2) A.P. Misra & R.K. Gulati, JJ. IT Appln.

Sec. 271(1)(a), Section 271

Madras H.C : The petitioner challenges the levy of penalty under s. 271(1)(a) of the IT Act, 1961, as confirmed by the CIT in revision under s. 264 of the Act. Notice of motion was ordered by S. Ramalingam J. on July 21, 1989.

Avijit Das / October 3, 1989

High Court Of Madras Ravi Steel Corporation vs. ITO & Anr. Section 271(1)(a) Bakthavatsalam, J. Writ Petition No. 7298 of

Sec. 139(1), Sec. 271(1)(a), Section 139, Section 271

Bombay H.C : Whether the Tribunal erred in law in holding that mens rea is not an essential ingredient for imposition of penalty under s. 271 (1) (a) of the IT Act, 1961 ?

Avijit Das / September 14, 1989

High Court Of Bombay Bralco Metal Industries (P) Ltd. vs. CIT Sections 139, 139(1), 271(1), 271(1)(a) Asst. Year1970-71 S.P. Bharucha

Sec. 271(1)(a), Section 139, Section 271

Calcutta H.C : The present rule was issued on December 12, 1977, at the instance of the writ petitioner, Amin Chand Payarelal, a partnership firm, praying, inter alia, for an appropriate writ commanding the respondents to cancel and/or withdraw the order dated September 26, 1974

Avijit Das / June 15, 1989

High Court Of Calcutta Amin Chand Pyarelal vs. Inspecting Assistant Commissioner & Ors. Sections 139, 271(1)(a) Asst. Year 1959-60, 1960-61,

Post pagination

← Previous 1 2 3 4 … 6 Next →

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top