Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

Section 256

Sec. 10(14), Section 256

Rajasthan H.C : Conveyance allowance of Rs. 21,705 received by the assessee from his employer was allowable under s. 10(14)

Avijit Das / April 10, 2006

High Court Of Rajasthan CIT vs. P.N. Verma Sections 10(14), 256(1) Asst. Year 1984-85 Rajesh Balia & R.P. Vyas, JJ. […]

Section 256, Section 68

Punjab & Haryana H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned Tribunal is right in law in deleting the addition of Rs. 2,60,000 made by AO and confirmed by CIT(A) on account of unexplained credits in the capital accounts of partners ?

Avijit Das / February 28, 2006

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana CIT vs. Kulwant Singh & Co. Section 68, 256(2) Asst. Year 1989-90 D.k. Jain,

Punjab & Haryana H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in confirming first appellate authority’s order deleting the addition of Rs. 1,48,93,286 made on account of bogus purchases ?

Avijit Das / February 21, 2006

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana CIT vs. Leaders Valves (P) Ltd. Section 256(2) Asst. Year 1986-87 D.K. Jain, C.J.

Sec. 254(2), Section 256, Section 69

Gujarat H.C : Whether, the Tribunal is right in law in deleting the addition of Rs. 7,65,960 on account of fictitious purchases of colour and chemicals ?

Avijit Das / January 25, 2006

High Court Of Gujarat CIT vs. Kashiram Textile Mills (P) Ltd. Sections 69, 254(2), 256(2) Asst. Year 1977-78 D.A. Mehta

Sec. 80P(2)(a)(i), Section 256, Section 80P

Bombay H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the interest on Government securities earmarked for statutory reserve fund was a part of banking business and accordingly the assessee is eligible for deduction under s. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the IT Act, 1961 ?

Avijit Das / August 16, 2005

High Court Of Bombay CIT vs. Maharashtra State Cooperative Bank Ltd. Sections 80P(2)(a)(i), 256(2) Asst. Year 1992-93 V.C. Daga &

Sec. 260A, Section 256, Section 31, Section 37

Madras H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in law in holding that the expenditure incurred by the assessee during the accounting year on the cost of carding system (Rs. 31,22,679) was amount paid on current repairs and allowable under s. 31 of the IT Act ?

Avijit Das / April 29, 2005

High Court Of Madras CIT & ORS. vs. Janakiram Mills Ltd. & Ors. Sections 31, 37, 256, 260A Asst. Year

Madhya Pradesh H.C : Whether Tribunal was justified or/and had the jurisdiction to ignore the decision of High Court rendered in MCC No. 65/1993 decided on 20th Aug., 1996 on the ground that it does not lay down correct principles of law on the issue involved therein ?

Avijit Das / April 15, 2005

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh : Indore Bench National Textile Corporation Ltd. vs. CIT Section 256(2) Deepak Verma & A.M.

Sec. 43(5), Section 256, Section 43

S.C :No question of law was required to be referred albeit for reasons other than the reason expressed by the High Court

Avijit Das / February 8, 2005

Supreme Court Of India CIT vs. Sharwan Kumar Agarwal Section 43(5), 256(2) Mrs. Ruma Pal, Dr. Arijit Pasayat & C.K.

Madhya Pradesh H.C : Cash of Rs. 14,00,000 found from the assessee stood explained is perverse and hence not justified

Avijit Das / January 11, 2005

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh : Indore Bench CIT vs. Dinesh Kumar Section 256(2) Block period 1986-87 to 20th Nov.,

Section 245, Section 256

Allahabad H.C : Is the order of the Tribunal restoring the case for fresh disposal back to the CIT(A) legally valid ?

Avijit Das / January 6, 2005

High Court Of Allahabad New Cawnpore Flour Mills vs. CIT Section 254(1), 256 Asst. Year 1979-80 R.K. Agrawal & Prakash

Post pagination

← Previous 1 … 3 4 5 … 52 Next →

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top