Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

Sec. 254(1)

Sec. 254(1), Section 254

Madhya Pradesh H.C : Whether Tribunal was justified in recording a finding that the assessment in question which were essentially based upon the revised return filed by the assessee are void ab initio and therefore, annulled ?

Avijit Das / March 10, 2006

High Court OfÂ Madhya Pradesh : Indore Bench CIT vs. Tollaram Hassomal Section 254(1), ITAT RULE 11 A.M. Sapre & […]

Sec. 254(1), Sec. 37(1), Section 254, Section 37

Madhya Pradesh H.C : Whether Tribunal was justified in setting aside of an order passed by the CIT under s. 263 of the IT Act without giving any finding much less categorical finding as to how and on what basis the case of the assessee falls in the excepted categories as defined under s. 40A(3) r/w cl. (j) of r. 6DD of the IT Rules, 1962 ?

Avijit Das / February 20, 2006

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh : Indore Bench CIT vs. Mandsour Ferro Alloys Ltd. Sections 37(1), 254(1) Asst. Year 1993-94

Sec. 254(1), Sec. 260A

Delhi H.C : t the notice regarding the hearing of the appeal was not properly served upon the appellant in one appeal and the respondent in the other

Avijit Das / January 18, 2006

High Court Of Delhi CIT vs. Hemla Hoziery Dyeing & Printing Mills (P) Ltd. Sections 254(1), 260A, ITAT Rule 24,

Sec. 254(1), Section 254

Gujarat H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal should have cancelled the order of the CIT under s. 263 directing the AO to disallow the additional commission ?

Avijit Das / January 17, 2006

High Court Of Gujarat Harsiddh Specific Family Trust vs. CIT Section 254(1) Asst. Year 1986-87 D.A. Mehta & Ms. H.N.

Sec. 143(3), Sec. 254(1), Sec. 260A, Section 143, Section 254, Section 260

Punjab & Haryana H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Hon’ble Tribunal was right in law to admit additional evidence and granting relief to the assessee on the basis of this evidence in violation of r. 29 of the IT (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963 ?

Avijit Das / January 16, 2006

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana CIT vs. Bank Of Punjab Ltd. Sections 143(3), 254(1), 260A, ITAT Rule 29 Asst.

Sec. 254(1), Section 254

Gujarat H.C : The Tribunal while deciding the assessee’s appeal against the order passed by the learned CIT under s. 263 of the IT Act had jurisdiction to direct the AO to make proper investigation and then decide the question of allowability of additional commission in accordance with law

Avijit Das / January 11, 2006

High Court Of Gujarat Harsiddh Specific Family Trust vs. CIT Section 254(1) Asst. Year 1986-87 D.A. Mehta & Ms. H.N.

Sec. 254(1), Section 254

Delhi H.C : The assessee has not appeared despite a notice under registered AD, the appeal was being decided on merits ex parte. Mr. P.C. Jain, learned counsel for the appellant, did not dispute the proposition

Avijit Das / November 18, 2005

High Court Of Delhi Josoka India Ltd. vs. CIT Section 254(1) T.S. Thakur & B.N. Chaturvedi, JJ. IT Appeal No.

Sec. 254(1), Section 254

Gujarat H.C : Whether, in the facts and under the circumstances of the case, the decision of the Tribunal was not perverse inasmuch as firstly, it does not consider the arguments advanced on behalf of the appellant and secondly, the impugned order is not at all reasoned and speaking order, thirdly, the impugned order is incoherent and vague and fourthly, it does not deal with all the grounds raised challenging various additions on the merits ?

Avijit Das / October 11, 2005

High Court Of Gujarat Gautam Harilal Gotecha vs. DCIT Section 254(1) D.A. Mehta & Ms. H.N. Devani, JJ. Tax Appeal

Sec. 254(1), Section 254

Gujarat H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in rejecting the assessee’s request of admitting in evidence the trust deed dt. 4th April, 1977, which was not filed at any earlier stage and was for the first time filed before the Tribunal on 16th Aug., 1993 ?

Avijit Das / October 6, 2005

High Court Of Gujarat N.B. Surti Family Trust vs. CIT Section 254(1), ITAT Rule 18, ITAT Rule 29 Asst. Years

Sec. 132(1), Sec. 158BC, Sec. 158BE, Sec. 254(1), Section 253

Delhi H.C : The survey proceedings were converted into a search. In the course of the said proceedings, the authorised officer passed an order in terms of s. 132(3)

Avijit Das / September 22, 2005

High Court Of Delhi M.B. Lal vs. CIT Sections 132(1), 158BC, 158BE, 253(1), 254(1) T.S. Thakur & Badar Durrez Ahmed,

Post pagination

← Previous 1 2 3 4 … 9 Next →

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top