Madras H.C : Sec. 201(1) and 201(1A) would not be applicable in cases where the payee was found to have suffered a loss
High Court Of Madras CIT, Chennai Vs. Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply & Sewerage Board Section : 195, 201 Mrs. Chitra […]
High Court Of Madras CIT, Chennai Vs. Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply & Sewerage Board Section : 195, 201 Mrs. Chitra […]
High Court Of Punjab & Haryana CIT (TDS), Chandigarh Vs. H.M.T. Ltd. Assessment Year : 1995-96 Section : 201 Adarsh
High Court Of Karnataka Richter Holding Ltd. vs. Assistant Director Of Income-Tax, International Taxation,Circle-II (1), Bangalore Section : 201 V.G.
High Court Of Calcutta PILCOM vs. CIT (TDS), Kolkata Assessment Year : 1995-96 Section : 201, 156 Bhaskar Bhattacharya And
High Court Of Gujarat CIT (TDS) vs. Shree Mahalaxmi Transport Co Assessment Year : 2007-08 Section : 194C, 194J And
High Court Of Gujarat CIT (TDS) vs. Swayam Shipping Services (P.) Ltd. Assessment Year : 2007-08 Section : 194C, 194-I,
High Court Of Bombay Vodafone International Holdings B.V. vs. Union Of India & Anr. Section 5(2), 9(1)(i), 195, 201(1), 201(1A)
High Court Of Uttarakhand CIT & Anr. vs. Enron Expat Services Inc. Section 192(1), 192(3), 201(1A) Asst. Year 2000-01 Barin
Supreme Court Of India CIT vs. Bharti Cellular Ltd. Section 194J, 201(1), 201(1A), 271C S.H. Kapadia, C.J. & K.S. Radhakrishnan,
Supreme Court Of India Kanchanganga Sea Foods Ltd. vs. CIT & ANR. Section 5(2), 195, 201(1), 201(1A), Asst. Year 1991-92,