Sec. 2(38), Sec. 36(1)(iv), Sec. 37(1)

Madras H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that a sum of Rs. 82,500 paid towards unexpired portion of the route permit was not a revenue expenditure ?

High Court Of Madras CIT vs. Kattabomman Transport Corporation Ltd. Section 2(38), 36(1)(iv), 37(1) Asst. Year 1976-77 R. Jayasimha Babu […]