Section 171

Section 171, Section 263

Madhya Pradesh H.C : Whether, on facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in upholding the order of the CIT under s. 263 which was passed without giving opportunity to all the members of the family (coparceners) who were adversely affected by virtue of provisions of s. 171(9) of the IT Act on the ground that the notice to the Karta was sufficient compliance with the provisions of s. 263 ?

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh : Indore Bench Kesharimal Bapulal (HUF) vs. CIT Sections 171(9), 263 Asst. Year 1980-81 J.G.

Scroll to Top
Malcare WordPress Security