S.C : the rental income from Umed Bhawan Palace was exempt under Section 10(19A) of the IT Act,1961
Supreme Court Of India Maharao Bhim Singh Of Kota vs. CIT, Rajasthan-II, Jaipur Section 10(19A) Ranjan Gogoi And Abhay Manohar […]
sec. 10(19a)
sec. 10(19a)
sec. 10(19a)
Rajasthan H.C : Whether however, where ruler ‘lets-out’ part of palace declared as his official residence; since ruler parted with possession of let-out portion of palace, exemption would not be available
High Court Of Rajasthan CIT, Jaipur Vs. Maharao Bhim Singh Section10(19A)Â Ajay Rastogi, Mohammad Rafiq And Alok Sharma, JJ. D.B.
