Skip to content
taxcaselaw.comtaxcaselaw.com
  • -
S.C : The expenditure cannot be considered as business expenditure
April 22, 2019

Supreme Court Of India Pr.CIT vs. Ballarpur Industries Ltd. Asst. Year 1993-94 Abhay Manohar Sapre....Read More

Bombay H.C : Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon’ble ITAT is correct in holding the compensation received by the appellant from Oracle Global (Mauritius) Ltd. for delay in payment of proceeds of shares tendered under the open offer includible in Capital Gains as against Interest Income ?
April 19, 2019

High Court Of Bombay CIT (IT) vs. Morgan Stanley Mauritius Company Ltd. Akil Kureshi &....Read More

Delhi H.C : The petitioner has been denied approval under Section 35(1)(ii) of the Income tax Act 1961
April 8, 2019

High Court Of Delhi Manipal Academy Of Higher Education vs. Union Of India & Anr.....Read More

Madras H.C : No part of the consideration for sate was received by the appellant and same was directly paid to the Bank by the purchaser in discharge of the mortgage amount and therefore no capital gains arises in the hands of the appellant
April 3, 2019

High Court Of Madras D. Zeenath vs. ITO Section 48 Asst. Year 1995-1996 Vineet Kothari....Read More

Bombay H.C : The Hon ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in reckoning the period for long term capital gains from the date of purchase of convertible debentures instead of actual date of allotment of shares on conversion from debentures
March 27, 2019

High Court Of Bombay Kingfisher Capital Clo Ltd. vs. CIT (International Taxation) & Anr. Section....Read More

Bombay H.C : The Tribunal justified in confirming the order of the CIT(A) and directing the AO to allow exemption u/s. 10(23C)(iiiab) of the Act without appreciating the fact that the assessee is not wholly or substantially financed by the Govt. in view of explanation to sub section (1) of section 14 of the Comptroller and Auditor General (Duties, Powers and Conditions of Services) Act, 1971 as the total Govt. grant during the year is less that 75% of the total expenditure of the assessee
March 26, 2019

High Court Of Bombay The Director Of Income Tax (Exemptions) vs. TATA Institute Of Social....Read More

S.C : The Tribunal came to the conclusion that prior to the insertion of the expression “suo motu” with effect from 1 April 2008 in Section 142(2C), the assessing officer had no jurisdiction to extend time for the submission of the report of an auditor appointed under sub section (2A)
March 26, 2019

Supreme Court Of India CIT vs. Ram Kishan Dass Section 142(2A), 142(2C) Dr. Dhananjaya Y.....Read More

Kerala H.C : Where the due date for issue of notice under Section 143(2) had expired, as on the date of search, there could be no re-assessment made by virtue of the provisions under Section 153A; of such matters as available in the returns filed, which stands concluded by sheer efflux of time
March 19, 2019

High Court Of Kerala CIT vs. K.P. Ummer, Prop. Star Rolling Mill Section 132, 132A,....Read More

Bombay H.C : The petition passed by the Transfer Pricing Officer (“TPO” for short) under Section 92CA(3)
March 15, 2019

High Court Of Bombay Times Global Broadcasting Company Ltd. vs. Union Of India & Ors.....Read More

Madras H.C : Whether the expenditure claimed by the Assessee is to be treated as Revenue Expenditure or Capital Expenditure
March 14, 2019

High Court Of Madras Hanon Automotive Systems India Private Limited (Previously Known As M/S.Visteon Automotive....Read More

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • …
  • 582
Copyright 2019 © taxcaselaw.com
  • Subscribe
  • Login