Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

September 2017

Allahabad H.C : The petitioner has preferred this writ petition so as to challenge the re-assessment proceedings initiated for the assessment year 2008-09 vide notice dated 30.03.2015 issued under Section 148

Avijit Das / September 19, 2017

High Court Of Allahabad Sairam Commercial Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union Of India And Other Section 148 Pankaj Mithal & Umesh […]

Bombay H.C : An Asset Management Company of Reliance Mutual Fund, invested its own funds in Reliance Mutual Fund and claimed dividend income and long-term capital gains as exempt, rule 8D(2)(iii) not applicable to work out disallowance u/s 14A

Avijit Das / September 19, 2017

High Court Of Bombay Pr.CIT – 3, Mumbai Vs. Reliance Capital Asset Management Ltd. Section 14A Assessment year 2008-09 S.C.

Bombay H.C : Even delay of 2984 days can be condoned if reasons for delay are convincing!

Avijit Das / September 19, 2017

High Court Of Bombay Vijay Vishin Meghani Vs. DCIT, Circle-23(2), Mumbai Section 253 Assessment years 1994-95 and 1996-97 S.C. Dharmadhikari

Delhi H.C : Where assessee raised objection before Tribunal regarding selection of comparables by TPO, in terms of rule 10B(2), read with rule 10B(3), Tribunal was required to undertake exercise of analyzing functions performed, assets employed and risks assumed by tested party and comparables

Avijit Das / September 18, 2017

High Court Of Delhi Corning Sas-India Branch Office Vs. Deputy Director of Income-tax Section 92C Assessment year 2008-09 S. Muralidhar

Gujarat H.C : Where assessee, engaged in execution of turnkey projects, maintained books of account under section 44AA(2) and, moreover, said accounts were audited and audit report had been furnished before Assessing Officer, its claim for being taxed as per provisions of section 44BBB(2) was to be allowed

Avijit Das / September 18, 2017

High Court Of Gujarat CIT (IT & TP) Vs. Shandong Tiejun Electric Power Engineering Co. Section 44BBB Akil Kureshi And

Section 92B, Section 92C

Delhi H.C : Where assessee was providing non-binding investment advisory services to its AE under sub-advising agreement, services of assessee could not be termed as that of merchant banker though there might be some overlap in advisory segment of services provided by merchant bankers

Avijit Das / September 18, 2017

High Court Of Delhi Avenue Asia Advisors (P.) Ltd. Vs. DCIT Section : 92C, 92B Assessment Year : 2009-10 Muralidhar

Calcutta H.C : It is open to Settlement Commission to use best judgment in computing figure for settlement, nonetheless it has to explain manner in which best judgment figure has been arrived at

Avijit Das / September 15, 2017

High Court Of Calcutta Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Circle-3(1), Kolkata Vs. Emta Coal Ltd. Section : 245F Debangsu Basak,

Section 35, Section 14A

Delhi H.C : Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal exceeded jurisdiction in setting aside the claim of weighted deduction under Section 35 (2AB) of the Act to the file of the assessing officer to re-examine the issue on grounds, which were not even subject matter of appeal before the Tribunal?

Avijit Das / September 15, 2017

High Court Of Delhi Eicher Motors Ltd. Vs. CIT-III Section 35, 14A Assessment year 2009-10 Muralidhar And Prathiba M. Singh,

Sec. 194C, Sec. 194J, Sec. 40(a)(ia)

Jammu And Kashmir H.C : No Income in hand of joint Venture Company Formed Just for participating in tender for contracts

Avijit Das / September 15, 2017

High Court Of Jammu And Kashmir Soma TRG Joint Ventue Vs. CIT Section 194C, 40(a)(ia) and 194J Assessment year 2005-06

Gujarat H.C : Legislature is competent to enact suitable amendatory legislation, hence with-drawal of deduction under section 35AC to any donations made to assessee-trust and other institutions after 1-4-2017 could not have been annulled on ground of being harsh

Avijit Das / September 14, 2017

High Court Of Gujarat Prashanti Medical Services & Research Foundation vs. Union of India Section 35AC Akil Kureshi And Biren

Post pagination

← Previous 1 2 3 … 5 Next →

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top