August 2017 - Page 4 of 8 - taxcaselaw.com

Kerala H.C : Where AO made addition to assessee’s income in respect of gold ornaments recovered from him after rejecting his explanation that it belonged to his employer company, in view of fact that director of employer company in his statement recorded under sec. 131 denied to have given ornaments to assessee for sale or as samples, impugned addition was to be confirmed

Avijit Das / August 23, 2017

High Court Of Kerala Karun Dutt Singh Vs. CIT Section 69A Assessment Year : 2007-08 Antony Dominic And Dama Seshadri […]

Avijit Das / August 22, 2017

High Court Of Bombay CIT (LTU) vs. Reliance Industries Ltd. S.C. Dharmadhikari & Vibha Kankanwadi, JJ. Notice Of Motion No.684

Avijit Das / August 22, 2017

High Court Of Bombay Maharaj Garage & Co. vs. CIT, Nagpur Section 271(1)(c),274 Assessment year 1987-88 R.K. Deshpande And Manish

Avijit Das / August 21, 2017

CESTAT, Mumbai Bench Podar Jumbo Kids Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai â€“ I Section 65(47) Ramesh Nair, Judicial Member

Avijit Das / August 21, 2017

High Court Of Allahabad Godrej Consumer Products Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Commercial tax Suneet Kumar, J. Sales/Trade Tax Revision No.

Avijit Das / August 21, 2017

CESTAT, Mumbai Bench Korean Air vs. Commissioner of Service Tax Section 9, 66A M.V. Ravindran, Judicial Member And C.J. Mathew,

Avijit Das / August 21, 2017

High Court Of Gujarat Designmate India P. Ltd. vs. CIT Section 263 Asst. Year 2011-12 Akil Kureshi & Biren Vaishnav,

Avijit Das / August 21, 2017

High Court Of Delhi Pr.CIT vs. Dharampal Premchand Ltd. Section 153A, 143(3), 132 Asst. Year 2005-06, 2006-07 & 2007-08 S.

Avijit Das / August 21, 2017

High Court Of Madras CIT, Chennai Vs. Dr. Hakeem S.A. Syed Sathar Section : 69A,158BC Block Period : 1997-98 to

Avijit Das / August 18, 2017

High Court Of Delhi Jagdish Prasad Gupta Vs. CIT Section 37(1) Assessment years : 1997-98 to 2002-03, 2004-05 and 2009-10