Delhi H.C : Deduction under section 80HHC was allowed without reducing deduction claimed and allowed under section 80-IB
High Court Of Delhi CIT vs. Purolator India Ltd. Assessment Year : 2000-01 Section : 80HHC, 80-IB, 147 Sanjiv Khanna […]
High Court Of Delhi CIT vs. Purolator India Ltd. Assessment Year : 2000-01 Section : 80HHC, 80-IB, 147 Sanjiv Khanna […]
High Court Of Delhi CIT-IV vs. Francis Wacziarg Assessment Year : 2003-04 Section : 28(i), 22 Sanjiv Khanna And R.V.
High Court Of Gujarat Kandoi Bhogilal Mulchand vs. DCIT Block Period : 1-4-1995 To 8-1-2002 Section : 158BFA Akil Kureshi
High Court Of Bombay Indian Hume Pipe Co. Ltd. Vs. ACIT, Central Circle-22 Assessment Year : 2003-04 Section : 147
High Court Of Rajasthan Lake Palace Hotels And Motels Ltd. Vs. Commissioner Of Wealth-Tax Assessment Years : 1997-98 & 1999-2000
High Court Of Karnataka CIT vs. Infosys Technologies Ltd. Assessment Years : 1993-94, 1994-95 And 1996-97 Section : 37(1) V.G.
High Court Of Delhi Power Finance Corporation Ltd. vs. ACIT Section : 254, 36(1)(Viii), Sanjiv Khanna And R.V. Easwar, JJ.
High Court Of Delhi CIT vs. Amway India Enterprises Assessment Years : 2001-02 And 2002-03 Section : 37(1) Sanjay Kishan
High Court Of Karnataka CIT And Another vs. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. Section 10-A, N. Kumar & Ravi Malikath, JJ.