Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

April 2010

Delhi H.C : The other was on the issue of merits with regard to the addition of Rs. 24,77,000 made by the AO under s. 68 of the said Act. The addition had also been confirmed by the CIT(A)

Avijit Das / April 27, 2010

High Court Of Delhi CIT vs. Suresh Kumar Kakar Section 68 Asst. Year 2000-01 Badar Durrez Ahmed & V. K. […]

Income Tax Case Laws, Sec. 17(3), Section 17, Section 4

Madras H.C : Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the sum of Rs. 22 lakhs paid by the employer to the assessee is not profits in lieu of salary ?

Avijit Das / April 27, 2010

High Court Of Madras CIT vs. A.K. Khosla Section 4, 17(3)(i), 17(3)(iii) Asst. Year 2001-02 Mrs. Prabha Sridevan & P.P.S.

Income Tax Case Laws

Allahabad H.C : the notices under s. 158BD of the IT Act, 1961

Avijit Das / April 27, 2010

High Court Of Allahabad Superhouse Overseas Ltd. vs. DCIT Rajes Kumar & Pankaj Mithal, JJ. Civil Misc. Writ Petn. No.

Bombay H.C : The Tribunal erred in law in rejecting the applicant’s contention to the effect that as there was a ‘family arrangement’, there was no ‘transfer’ and consequently no gift

Avijit Das / April 27, 2010

High Court Of Bombay Pannalal Silk Mills (P.) Ltd. vs. Commissioner Of Gift-Tax Section : 4 V.C. Daga And K.K.

Patna H.C : An application for review is not maintainable when the appeal is disposed of under s. 260A

Avijit Das / April 26, 2010

High Court Of Patna : Full Bench D.N. Singh vs. CIT & Anr. Section 260A; CPC 1908, s. 151 Dipak

Sec. 44AB, Section 271B, Section 273B

Allahabad H.C : The assessee benefit of ‘reasonable cause’ for the delay in preventing it from complying with the provisions of section 44AB

Avijit Das / April 26, 2010

High Court Of Allahabad CIT VS. U.P. Rajya Sahkari Evam Bhoomi Vikas Bank Ltd. Assessment Year : 1990-91 Section :

Delhi H.C : No defect in the accounts books was found by the AO and the GP rate for the assessment year in question was almost similar to the GP rate declared in the immediate preceding year

Avijit Das / April 26, 2010

High Court Of Delhi CIT vs. JAS Jack Elegance Exports Section 145 Asst. Year 2004-05 Badar Durrez Ahmed & V.K.

Section 4, Sec. 36(1)(va), Sec. 36(1)(Viia), Section 145, Section 43B, Section 5

Bombay H.C : Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in deleting the addition made on account of excess cash received at the cash counters of the branches in some years ?

Avijit Das / April 23, 2010

High Court Of Bombay CIT vs. Bank Of Rajasthan Ltd. Section 4, 5, 36(1)(va), 36(i)(viia), 43B, 145 Asst. Year 2002-03

Bombay H.C : Notice issued by the CIT-I, Nasik on 30th April, 2009 seeking to exercise the revisional jurisdiction under s. 263

Avijit Das / April 23, 2010

High Court Of Bombay Ashoka Buildcon Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr. Section 263(2) Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud

Section 40A, Sec. 40A(3)

Chhattisgarh H.C : the banking instruments which do not find place specifically in s. 40A(3) of the IT Act, 1961 being credible, cannot be denied with reference to the provisions of s. 40A1(3) of the Act ? Whether the Tribunal has ignored the true nature of transaction which was initially between the supplier and the intermediaries and thereafter between the intermediaries and the assessee

Avijit Das / April 22, 2010

High Court Of Chhattisgarh CIT vs. Vijay Kumar Goel Section 40A(3), IT RULE 6DD, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, ss. 5

Post pagination

← Previous 1 2 3 … 7 Next →

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top